Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 186, Issue 4, pp 2215–2229 | Cite as

A half-century analysis of landscape dynamics in southern Québec, Canada

  • Benoît Jobin
  • Claudie Latendresse
  • Alain Baril
  • Charles Maisonneuve
  • Céline Boutin
  • Dominique Côté


We studied landscape dynamics for three time periods (<1950, 1965, and 1997) along a gradient of agricultural intensity from highly intensive agriculture to forested areas in southern Québec. Air photos were analyzed to obtain long-term information on land cover (crop and habitat types) and linear habitats (hedgerows and riparian habitats) and landscape metrics were calculated to quantify changes in habitat configuration. Anthropogenic areas increased in all types of landscapes but mostly occurred in the highly disturbed cash crop dominated landscape. Perennial crops (pasture and hayfields) were largely converted into annual crops (corn and soybean) between 1965 and 1997. The coalescence of annual crop fields resulted in a more homogeneous agricultural landscape. Old fields and forest cover was consistently low and forest fragmentation remained stable through time in the intensive agriculture landscapes. However, forest cover increased and forest fragmentation receded in the forest-dominated landscapes following farm abandonment and the transition of old fields into forests. Tree-dominated hedgerows and riparian habitats increased in areas with intensive agriculture. Observed changes in land cover classes are related to proximate factors, such as surficial deposits and topography. Agriculture intensification occurred in areas highly suitable for agriculture whereas farm abandonment was observed in poor-quality agriculture terrains. Large-scale conversion of perennial crops into annual crops along with continued urbanization exerts strong pressures on residual natural habitats and their inhabiting wildlife. The afforestation process occurring in the more forested landscapes along with the addition of tree-dominated hedgerows and riparian habitats in the agriculture-dominated landscapes should improve landscape ecological value.


Agriculture intensification Fragmentation Land cover Landscape dynamic Québec 



The authors thank Martine Benoit and Marcelle Grenier for their technical and scientific input. Also, the authors thank Luc Bélanger, Rhéaume Courtois, René Lafond, Yvon Mercier, and Isabelle Ringuet for their continued support throughout the project. Funding was provided by Environment Canada and the Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la faune du Québec.


  1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (2012). Soil Landscapes of Canada (SLC). Accessed 18 March 2013.
  2. Bélanger, L., & Grenier, M. (2002). Agriculture intensification and forest fragmentation in the St. Lawrence valley, Québec, Canada. Landscape Ecology, 17, 495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohnet, I. C., & Pert, P. L. (2010). Patterns, drivers and impacts of urban growth—a study from Cairns, Queensland, Australia from 1952 to 2031. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonin, J., Desgranges, J.-L., Rodrigue, J., & Ouellet, M. (1997). Anuran species richness in agricultural landscapes of Québec: foreseeing long-term results of road call surveys. Herpetological Conservation, 1, 141–149.Google Scholar
  5. Boutin, C., & Jobin, B. (1998). Intensity of agricultural practices and effects on adjacent habitats. Ecological Applications, 8, 544–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boutin, C., Jobin, B., Bélanger, L., Baril, A., Freemark, K. E. (2001). Hedgerows in the farming landscapes of Canada. In: C. Barr and S. Petit (Eds.), Hedgerows of the World: their ecological functions in different landscapes (pp. 33–42). Proceedings of the tenth annual IALE (UK) conference, Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar
  7. Boutin, C., Jobin, B., Bélanger, L., & Choinière, L. (2002). Plant diversity in three types of hedgerows adjacent to cropfields. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boutin, C., Jobin, B., & Bélanger, L. (2003). Importance of riparian habitats to flora conservation in farming landscapes of southern Québec, Canada. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 94, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brennan, L. A., & Kuvlesky, W. P., Jr. (2005). North American grassland birds: an unfolding conservation crisis? Journal of Wildlife Management, 69, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brouillette-Paradis, M. (2010). Les mutations de l’agriculture au Québec: l’introduction du maïs-grain dans la vallée du Richelieu après la seconde guerre mondiale. M.Sc. thesis, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QuébecGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, D. G., Johnson, K. M., Loveland, T. R., & Theobald, D. M. (2005). Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950–2000. Ecological Applications, 15, 851–1863.Google Scholar
  12. Burel, F., Butet, A., Delettre, Y. R., & Millàn de la Pena, N. (2004). Differential response of selected taxa to landscape context and agricultural intensification. Landscape and Urban Planning, 67, 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bürgi, M., & Turner, M. G. (2002). Factors and processes shaping land cover and land cover changes along the Wisconsin river. Ecosystems, 5, 184–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Çakir, G., Sivrikaya, F., & Keles, S. (2008). Forest cover change and fragmentation using Landsat data in Maçka State Forest Enterprise in Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 137, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coops, N. C., Gillanders, S. N., Wulder, M. A., Gergel, S. E., Nelson, T., & Goodwin, N. R. (2010). Assessing changes in forest fragmentation following infestation using time series Landsat imagery. Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 2355–2365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. COSEWIC. (2010). COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus in Canada. Ottawa: Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada.Google Scholar
  17. De Baets, N., Gariépy, S., & Vézina, A. (2007). Le portrait de l’agroforesterie au Québec. Gouvernement du Canada, 76 p. Accessed 18 March 2013.
  18. de Snoo, G. R., & de Wit, P. J. (1998). Buffer zones for reducing pesticide drift to ditches and risks to aquatic organisms. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 41, 112–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deckers, B., Kerselaers, E., Gulink, H., Muys, B., & Hermy, M. (2005). Long-term spatio-temporal dynamics of a hedgerow network landscape in Flanders, Belgium. Environmental Conservation, 32, 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dewan, A. M., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2009). Using remote sensing and GIS to detect and monitor land use and land cover change in Dhaka Metropolitan of Bangladesh during 1960–2005. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 150, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dikou, A., Papapanagiotou, E., & Troumbis, A. (2011). Integrating landscape ecology and geoinformatics to decipher landscape dynamics for regional planning. Environmental Management, 48, 523–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Domon, G., & Bouchard, A. (2007). The landscape history of Godmanchester (Quebec, Canada): two centuries of shifting relationships between anthropic and biophysical factors. Landscape Ecology, 22, 1201–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ducks Unlimited Canada. (2010). Southern Ontario Wetland Conversion Analysis (Final Report). Barrie: Ducks Unlimited Canada-Ontario Office.Google Scholar
  24. Elkie, P. C., Rempel, R. S., Carr, A. P. (1999). Patch Analyst user’s manual. Ontario Ministry of Natural Ressources. Thunder Bay, Ontario: Northwest Science & Technology. TM-002.Google Scholar
  25. Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flinn, K. M., Vellend, M., & Marks, P. L. (2005). Environmental causes and consequences of forest clearance and agricultural abandonment in central New York, USA. Journal of Biogeography, 32, 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Franklin, S. E., Dickson, E. E., Farr, D. R., Hansen, M. J., & Moskal, L. M. (2000). Quantification of landscape change from satellite remote sensing. The Forestry Chronicle, 76, 877–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fukami, T., & Wardle, D. A. (2005). Long-term ecological dynamics: reciprocal insights from natural and anthropogenic gradients. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 272, 2105–2115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fuller, R. J., Gregory, R. D., Gibbons, D. W., Marchant, J. H., Wilson, J. D., Baillie, S. R., & Carter, N. (1995). Population declines and range contraction among lowland farmland birds in Britain. Conservation Biology, 9, 1425–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gove, B., Power, A., Buckley, G. P., & Ghazoul, J. (2007). Effects of herbicide spray drift and fertilizer overspread on selected species of woodland ground flora: comparison between short-term and long-term impact assessments and field surveys. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44, 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Griffith, J. A., Stehman, S. V., Sohl, T. L., & Loveland, T. R. (2003). Detecting trends in landscape pattern metrics over a 20-year period using a sampling-based monitoring programme. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guerrero, I., Morales, M. B., Oñate, J. J., Geiger, F., Berendse, F., de Snoo, G., Eggers, S., Pärt, T., Bengtsson, J., Clement, L. W., Weisser, W. W., Olszewski, A., Ceryngier, P., Hawro, V., Liira, J., Aavik, T., Fischer, C., Flohre, A., Thies, C., & Tscharntke, T. (2012). Response of ground-nesting farmland birds to agricultural intensification across Europe: landscape and field level management factors. Biological Conservation, 152, 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hepinstall, J. A., Alberti, M., & Marzluff, J. M. (2008). Predicting land cover change and avian community responses in rapidly urbanizing environments. Landscape Ecology, 23, 1257–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jansen, L. J. M., Carrai, G., Morandini, L., Cerutti, P. O., & Spisni, A. (2006). Analysis of the spatio-temporal and semantic aspects of land-cover/use change dynamics 1991–2001 in Albania at national and district levels. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 119, 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Javorek, S. K., Antonowitsch, R., Callaghan, C., Grant, M., & Weins, T. (2007). Changes to wildlife habitat on agricultural land in Canada, 1981–2001. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 87, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jenkins, M. A., & Parker, G. R. (2000). Changes in the forest landscape of the Charles C. Deam Wilderness, Southern Indiana, 1939–1990. Natural Areas Journal, 20, 46–55.Google Scholar
  37. Jobin, B., & Falardeau, G. (2010). Habitat associations of Grasshopper Sparrows in Southern Québec. Northeastern Naturalist, 17, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jobin, B., DesGranges, J.-L., & Boutin, C. (1996). Population trends in selected species of farmland birds in relation to recent developments in agriculture in the St. Lawrence Valley. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 57, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jobin, B., Beaulieu, J., Grenier, M., Bélanger, L., Maisonneuve, C., Bordage, D., & Filion, B. (2003). Landscape changes and ecological studies in agricultural regions, Québec, Canada. Landscape Ecology, 18, 575–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jobin, B., Bélanger, L., Boutin, C., & Maisonneuve, C. (2004). Conservation value of agricultural riparian strips in the Boyer River watershed, Quebec (Canada). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 103, 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jobin, B., Grenier, M., & Laporte, P. (2005). Using satellite imagery to assess breeding habitat availability of the endangered loggerhead shrike in Québec. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jobin, B., Latendresse, C., Grenier, M., Maisonneuve, C., & Sebbane, A. (2010). Recent landscape change at the ecoregion scale in Southern Québec (Canada), 1993–2001. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 164, 631–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kerr, J. T., & Cihlar, J. (2003). Land use and cover with intensity of agriculture for Canada from satellite and census data. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kerr, J. T., & Cihlar, J. (2004). Patterns and causes of species endangerment in Canada. Ecological Applications, 14, 743–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laiolo, P., Dondero, F., Ciliento, E., & Rolando, A. (2004). Consequences of pastoral abandonment for the structure and diversity of the alpine avifauna. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lapointe, J., Imbeau, L., Tremblay, J. A., Maisonneuve, C., & Mazerolle, M. J. (2013). Habitat use by female peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus) in an agricultural landscape. Auk, 130, 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lasanta-Martínez, T., Vicente-Serrano, S. M., & Cuadrat-Prats, J. M. (2005). Mountain Mediterranean landscape evolution caused by the abandonment of traditional primary activities: a study of the Spanish Central Pyrenees. Applied Geography, 25, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Latendresse, C., Jobin, B., Baril, A., Maisonneuve, C., Boutin, C., & Côté, D. (2008). Dynamique spatio-temporelle des habitats fauniques dans l’écorégion des Basses terres du fleuve Saint-Laurent, 1950–1997. Série de rapports techniques no 494, Environnement Canada, Service canadien de la faune, région du Québec, Québec.Google Scholar
  49. Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  50. Luck, M., & Wu, J. (2002). A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecology, 17, 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maisonneuve, C., & Rioux, S. (2001). Importance of riparian habitats for small mammal and herpetofaunal communities in agricultural landscapes of southern Québec. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 83, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McCune, B., & Mefford, M. J. (1999). PC-ORD (Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4). Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA: MjM Software Design.Google Scholar
  53. McGarigal, K., & Marks, B. J. (1994). FRAGSTATS : Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Report PNW-GTR-351, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. Accessed 18 March 2013.
  54. Medley, K. E., Okey, B. W., Barrett, G. W., Lucas, M. F., & Renwick, W. H. (1995). Landscape change with agricultural intensification in a rural watershed, southwestern Ohio, U.S.A. Landscape Ecology, 10, 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Newman, M. E., McLaren, K. P., & Wilson, B. S. (2011). Use of object-oriented classification and fragmentation analysis (1985–2008) to identify important areas for conservation in Cockpit Country, Jamaica. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 172, 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Olsen, L. M., Dale, V. H., & Foster, T. (2007). Landscape patterns as indicators of ecological change at Fort Benning, Georgia, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Oreszczyn, S., & Lane, A. (1999). How hedgerows and field margins are perceived by different interest groups. Aspects of Applied Biology, 54, 29–36.Google Scholar
  58. Painchaud, J. (1999). La production porcine et la culture du maïs. Impacts potentiels sur la qualité de l’eau. Le Naturaliste Canadien, 123, 41–46.Google Scholar
  59. Pan, D., Domon, G., de Blois, S., & Bouchard, A. (1999). Temporal (1958–1993) and spatial patterns of land use changes in Haut-Saint-Laurent (Quebec, Canada) and their relation to landscape physical structure. Landscape Ecology, 14, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Paquette, S., & Domon, G. (2001). Rural domestic landscape changes: a survey of the residential practices of local and migrant populations. Landscape Research, 26, 367–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Peterjohn, W. T., & Correll, D. L. (1984). Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology, 65, 1466–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pontius, R. G., Jr., Shusas, E., & McEachern, M. (2004). Detecting important land changes while accounting for persistence. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 101, 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Radeloff, V. C., Hammer, R. B., & Stewart, S. I. (2005). Rural and urban sprawl in the U.S. Midwest from 1940 to 2000 and its relation to forest fragmentation. Conservation Biology, 19, 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rittenhouse, C. D., Pidgeon, A. M., Albright, T. P., Culbert, P. D., Clayton, M. K., Flather, C. H., Masek, J. G., & Radeloff, V. C. (2012). Land-cover change and avian diversity in the conterminous United States. Conservation Biology, 26, 821–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ruiz, J., & Domon, G. (2009). Analysis of landscape pattern change trajectories within areas of intensive agricultural use: case study in a watershed of southern Québec, Canada. Landscape Ecology, 24, 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ruskule, A., Nikodemus, O., Kasparinska, Z., Kasparinskis, R., & Brūmelis, G. (2012). Patterns of afforestation on abandoned agriculture land in Latvia. Agroforestry Systems, 85, 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. SAS Institute Inc. (2004). SAS/STAT 9.1 User’s Guide. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  68. Saunders, D. A., Hobbs, R. J., & Margules, C. R. (1991). Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology, 5, 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schmucki, R., de Blois, S., Bouchard, A., & Domon, G. (2002). Spatial and temporal dynamics of hedgerows in three agricultural landscapes of southern Quebec, Canada. Environmental Management, 30, 651–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Statistics Canada (2012). 2006 Census of Agriculture. Accessed 18 March 2013.
  71. Stoate, C., Boatman, N. D., Borralho, R. J., Rio Carvalho, C., de Snoo, G. R., & Eden, P. (2001). Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 63, 337–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tardif, B., Lavoie, G., & Lachance, Y. (2005). Atlas de la biodiversité du Québec. Les espèces menacées ou vulnérables. Gouvernement du Québec, ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs, Direction du développement durable, du patrimoine écologique et des parcs, Québec, Québec.Google Scholar
  73. Verburg, P. H., Neumann, K., & Nol, L. (2011). Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies. Global Change Biology, 17, 974–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weng, Y.-C. (2007). Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wildlife Habitat Canada. (2001). The Status of Wildlife Habitats in Canada—2001. Ottawa: Wildlife Habitat Canada.Google Scholar
  76. Wilson, J. D., Morris, A. J., Arroyo, B. E., Clark, S. C., & Bradbury, R. B. (1999). A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods of granivorous birds in northern Europe in relation to agricultural change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 75, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zar, J. H. (1984). Biostatistical analysis (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benoît Jobin
    • 1
  • Claudie Latendresse
    • 1
  • Alain Baril
    • 2
  • Charles Maisonneuve
    • 3
  • Céline Boutin
    • 2
  • Dominique Côté
    • 1
  1. 1.Canadian Wildlife ServiceEnvironment CanadaQuébecCanada
  2. 2.National Wildlife Research Centre, Environment CanadaCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Ministère des Ressources NaturellesDirection de l’expertise Faune-Forêts-Territoire du Bas-Saint-LaurentRimouskiCanada

Personalised recommendations