Conventional, microwave, and ultrasound sequential extractions for the fractionation of metals in sediments within the Petrochemical Industry, Serbia
- 348 Downloads
In this paper, the main objective was fractionation of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn, Ca, Fe, and K in certificate material and sediment samples gathered from and around the Petrochemical Industry using the conventional, microwave and ultrasonic sequential extraction. Microwave oven and ultrasound bath were used as an energy source for achieving faster extraction. Additional heating and boiling of samples were avoided by using lower power and shorter time for microwave and ultrasound extraction. Precision and accuracy of procedure were evaluated by using certificate material (BCR701). Acceptable accuracy of metals (87.0–111.3 %) was achieved for all three-step sequential of conventional extraction protocol. An accuracy of the fourth step has been verified with two certificate materials: BCR143R and 146R. The range of total extracted metal concentrations from sediments was similar for all three extraction techniques. A significant high percentage of Cd, Cu, and Zn were obtained after extraction of the exchangeable and acid soluble sediment fraction. Principal component analysis of values obtained after determination of risk assessment code using conventional and ultrasound sequential extraction show similarity of these values. Accuracy, recovery, and risk assessment code values imply that ultrasound sequential extraction is a more suitable, accelerated sequential extraction procedure (30 min per extraction step) than microwave extraction in applied conditions.
KeywordsMetals Extraction techniques Risk assessment code Sediment
This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, grant nos. 172001 and 43007. The authors are grateful to the Petrochemical Industry, Pančevo, for providing the samples and to the anonymous reviewers whose comments led to a greatly improved the manuscript.
- Arain, M. B., Kazi, T. G., Jamali, M. K., Jalbani, N., Afridi, H. I., & Baig, J. A. (2008). Speciation of heavy metals in sediment by conventional, ultrasound and microwave assisted single extraction methods: a comparison with modified sequential extraction procedure. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154, 998–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Castillo, M. L. A., Alonso, E. V., Cordero, M. T. S., Pavón, J. M. C., & de Torres, A. G. (2011). Fractionation of heavy metals in sediment by using microwave assisted sequential extraction procedure and determination by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Microchemical Journal, 98, 234–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De la Guardia, M., & Moralse-Rubio, A. (1996). Modern strategies for the rapid determination of metals in sewage sludges. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 15, 311–318.Google Scholar
- Nemati, K., Abu Bakar, N. K., Abas, M. R., & Sobhanzadeh, E. (2011). Speciation of heavy metals by modified BCR sequential extraction procedure in different depths of sediments from Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia. Journal of Hazardous Material, 192, 402–410.Google Scholar
- Ure, A. M., Quevauviller, P., Muntau, H., & Griepink, B. (1993). Speciation of heavy metals in soils and sediments: an account of the improvement and harmonization of extraction techniques undertaken under the auspices of the BCR of the CEC. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 51, 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar