Evaluating Integrated Watershed Management using multiple criteria analysis—a case study at Chittagong Hill Tracts in Bangladesh
- 645 Downloads
Criteria and indicators assessment is one of the ways to evaluate management strategies for mountain watersheds. One framework for this, Integrated Watershed Management (IWM), was employed at Chittagong Hill Tracts region of Bangladesh using a multi-criteria analysis approach. The IWM framework, consisting of the design and application of principles, criteria, indicators, and verifiers (PCIV), facilitates active participation by diverse professionals, experts, and interest groups in watershed management, to explicitly address the demands and problems to measure the complexity of problems in a transparent and understandable way. Management alternatives are developed to fulfill every key component of IWM considering the developed PCIV set and current situation of the study area. Different management strategies, each focusing on a different approach (biodiversity conservation, flood control, soil and water quality conservation, indigenous knowledge conservation, income generation, watershed conservation, and landscape conservation) were assessed qualitatively on their potential to improve the current situation according to each verifier of the criteria and indicator set. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), including sensitivity analysis, was employed to identify an appropriate management strategy according to overall priorities (i.e., different weights of each principle) of key informants. The AHP process indicated that a strategy focused on conservation of biodiversity provided the best option to address watershed-related challenges in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh.
KeywordsMulti-criteria analysis (MCA) Criteria and indicators (C&I) assessment Integrated Watershed Management (IWM) Resource planning Key stakeholders Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bakkes, J.-A., Van Den Born, G.-J., Helder, J.-C., Swart, R.-J., Hope, C.-W., & Parker, J.-D. (1994). An overview of environmental indicators: State of the art and perspectives. UNEP/EATR.94–01, RIVM/402001001. Nairobi Environmental Assessment Sub-Programme, United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
- Beattie, B. B. (1969). Watershed conditions and watershed research needs in Chittagong Hill Tracts (p. 15). Project Report 2, UNDP/FAO Project, BGD/72/005, BFRI, Chittagong, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
- Chowdhury, M. S. H, Biswas, S., Haque, S. M. S, Muhammed, N., & Koike, M. (2007a). Comparative analysis of some selected macronutrients of soil orange orchard and degraded forests in Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. Journal of Forest Research, 18(1), 27–30. doi: 10.1007/s11676-007-0005-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- CIFOR (1997). CIFOR annual report 1996. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia (66 pp.). CIFOR annual report.Google Scholar
- CIFOR (1999). CIFOR criteria and indicators generic template. The Criteria and Indicators Toolbox Series No. 2. CIFOR C&I Team.Google Scholar
- FD (2007). www.bforest.gov.bd.
- Gafur, A., Jensen, J. R. Aunsø, Borggaard, O. K., & Petersen, L. (2003). Runoff and losses of soil and nutrients from small watersheds under shifting cultivation (Jhum) in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh. Journal of Hydrology, 279(1–4), 293–309. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00351-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Garfi, M., Ferrer-Marti, L., Bonoli, A., & Tondelli, S. (2011). Multi-criteria analysis for improving strategic environmental assessment of water programmes. A case study in semi-arid region of Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 665–675. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Golden, B., Marker, P., & Wasil, E. (1989). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and studies. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hammond, A., Adriaanse, A., Rodenburg, E., Bryant, D., & Woodward, R. (1995). Environmental indicators: A systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. Washington: World Resource Institute.Google Scholar
- Heathcote, I. W. (1998). MCA integrated watershed management: Principles and practices. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Hettelingh, J. P., De Hann, B. J., Strengers, B. J., Klein Goldewijk, C. G. M., Van Woerden, J. W., Pearce, D. W., et al. (1998). Integrated environmental assessment of the baseline scenario for the EU state of the environment. 1998 Report, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- In, H., & Olson, D. (2004). Requirements negotiation using multi-criteria preference analysis. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10(4), 306–325.Google Scholar
- Khan, M. A. A., & Haque, S. M. S. (2003). Features and characteristics of Bangladesh watershed (p. 51). B.Sc. (Hons) Project paper, Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
- Khisa, S. K., Shoaib, J. U., & Khan, N. A. (2006). Conservation approaches and technologies of hill farming and natural resource management practices documented from Chittagong Hill Tracts. Bangladesh, BANCAT, CHTDB. Khagrachari.Google Scholar
- Kodikara, P. N., Perera, B. J. C., & Kularathna, M. D. U. P. (2010). Stakeholder preference elicitation and modelling in multi-criteria decision analysis—A case study on urban water supply. European Journal of Operational Research, 206, 209–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.02.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lammerts van Bueren, F., & Blom, F. (1997). Hierarchical framework for the formulation for sustainable forest management standards: Principles, criteria and indicators. Wageningen: Tropenbos Foundation.Google Scholar
- Mendoza, G. A. (1997a). Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Theory and application to natural resources management. In Proceedings: Joint annual meeting of the American Congress on Surveying and Mapping (ACSM); American Association of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS), and Resources Technology Institute (RTI), 5–10 April. Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
- Mendoza, G. A. (1997b). A GIS based multi-criteria approaches to land suitability assessment and allocation. In Proceedings: Seventh international symposium on systems analysis in forest resources, 28–31 May. Traverse City, Michigan.Google Scholar
- Mendoza, G. A., & Prabhu, R. (2000b). Evaluating and selecting criteria and indicators for forest sustainability: A case study on participatory assessment under CBFM in the Philippines. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 2(2), 33–53.Google Scholar
- Microsoft Corporation (1995). Powerpoint version 1993–2007. Redmond, Washington.Google Scholar
- Milder, J. C., Scherr, S. J., & Bracer, C. (2010). Trends and future potential of payment for ecosystem services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 4.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (1999). New strategies for America’s watersheds. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Prabhu, R., Colfer, C., & Dudley, R. G. (1998). Guidelines for developing, testing and selecting criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management. CIFOR Special Publication.Google Scholar
- Prabhu, R., Colfer, C. J. P., & Dudley, R. G. (1999). Guidelines for developing, testing and selecting criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management. Criteria and Indicators Toolbox Series No. 1. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.Google Scholar
- Qureshi, M. E., & Harrison, S. H. (2003). Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to riparian revegetation policy options. Small-Scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 2(3), 441–458.Google Scholar
- Rahman, M. M., Ainun, N., & Vacik, H. (2009). Anthropogenic disturbances and plant diversity of the Madhupur Sal forests (Shorea robusta C.F. Gaertn.) of Bangladesh. The International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystems Services & Management, 5(3), 162–173. doi: 10.1080/17451590903236741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saaty, T. L. (1995). Decision making for leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for decisions in a complex world. Pittsburgh: RWS.Google Scholar
- SRDI (1987). Soil Research and Development Institute mapGoogle Scholar
- Steiguer, J. E. D., Duberstein, J., & Lopes, V. (2003). The Analytic Hierarchy Process as a means for Integrated Watershed Management (pp. 734–740). Tucson: School of Renewable Natural Resources, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
- Swallow, B. M., Kallesoe, M. F., Iftikhar, U. A., van Noordwijk, M., Bracer, C., Scherr, S. J., et al. (2009). Compensation and rewards for environmental services in the developing world: Framing pan-tropical analysis and comparison. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 26.Google Scholar
- Swart, R. J., & Bakkes, J. A. (Eds.) (1995). Scanning the global environment: A framework and methodology for integrated environmental reporting and assessment. Environmental assessment sub-programme. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme. UNEP/EATR.95–01, RIVM 402001002.Google Scholar
- Tiwari, K. R., Rosham, M. B., & Sitaula, B. K. (2008). Natural resource and watershed management in Sourh Asia: A comparative evaluation with special references to Nepal. The Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 9, 72–89Google Scholar
- USDA Forest Service (1997). Report of the United States on the criteria and indicators for the sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington DC. URL: http://www.fs.fed.us/global/pub/links/report/contents.html.
- Vargas, L., & Zahedi, F. (Eds.) (1993). Special issue. Analytic Hierarchy Process and its applications. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 17 (4–5), 1–209. doi: 10.1016/0895-7177(93)90169-Y
- Vergano, D. (2003). Water shortages will leave world in dire straits. USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-01-26-water-usat_x.htm.