Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 184, Issue 4, pp 1909–1919 | Cite as

Environmental impact assessment (EIA): an overlooked instrument for sustainable development in Pakistan

  • Rashid Saeed
  • Ayesha Sattar
  • Zafar Iqbal
  • Muhammad Imran
  • Raziya Nadeem


Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is a policy tool used for evaluating a project proposal from physical and socioeconomic environmental perspectives. Its aim is to reduce the impact of development on environment, hence, ensuring environmental sustainability. It is mandatory to submit an Environmental Impact Statement before starting a mega project as required by Environmental Protection Act of 1997 and Environmental Policy of Pakistan. Public consultation plays a key role in an EIA system, identifying the likely aspects and impacts of a development activity. This aspect has been ignored in effective enactment of environmental legislation in Pakistan. Sufficient legislative instruments are there to support EIA system in the country but the agencies responsible for the enforcement of environmental regulations have failed to do so. The current research gives an insight into the actual status of EIA system in Pakistan along with the feedback of EIA specialists and university teachers of the concerned departments. A new index has been devised on the basis of questionnaire response to work out the overall performance of EIA system in Pakistan or any other country. The weaknesses and deficiencies of each EIA stage have been worked out for Pakistan and elaborated with the help of the controversial Zero point Interchange Project in the capital city of Pakistan.


Environmental impact assessment Environmental protection agency Pakistan Zero point interchange project Capital development authority Pakistan Environmental Protection Act (PEPA 1997)  EIA index 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahmad, B., & Wood, C. M. (2002). A comparative evaluation of the EIA systems in Egypt, Turkey and Tunisia. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(3), 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aslam, F. (2006). Environmental Impact Assessment System in Pakistan—Overview, Implementation and Effectiveness. Master’s Thesis. Stockholm: Kthroyal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  3. Alshuwaikhat, H. M. (2005). Strategic environmental assessment can help solve environmental impact assessment failures in developing countries. Journal of Environment Impact Assessment Review, 25(4), 307–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Environmental Impact Assessment Course Module, UNU (2006). http://eia.unu.edu/course/?page_id=173.
  5. Fitzpatrick, P., & Sinclair, A. J. (2003). Learning through public involvement in environmental assessment hearings. Journal of Environmental Management, 67(2), 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fitzpatrick, P., & Sinclair, A. J. (2009). Multi-jurisdictional environmental impact assessment: Canadian experiences. Journal of Environment Impact Assessment Review, 29(4), 252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuller, K. (1999). Quality and quality control in environmental impact assessment. In: J. Petts (ed), Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell Science ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Government of Pakistan (GoP) (1983). Pakistan Environmental Protection Ordinance, 1983. Islamabad: Gazette of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  9. Government of Pakistan (GoP) (1997a) Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997. Islamabad: Gazette of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  10. Government of Pakistan (GoP) (1997b) Policy and Procedures for the Filing, Review and Approval of Environmental Assessments. Islamabad: Pak-EPA.Google Scholar
  11. Government of Pakistan (GoP) (1997c) Guidelines for preparation and review of environmental reports. Islamabad: Pak-EPA.Google Scholar
  12. Haapio, A., & Viitaniemi, A. (2008). A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environment Impact Assessment Review, 28(7), 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leu, W. S., Williams, W. P., & Bark, A. W. (1996). Development of an environmental impact assessment evaluation model and its application: Taiwan case study. Journal of Environment Impact Assessment Review, 16(2), 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nadeem, O., & Hameed, R. (2006). A critical review of the adequacy of EIA reports—Evidence from Pakistan. World Academy of Science and Technology, 23(2006), 64–70.Google Scholar
  15. Nadeem, O., & Hameed, R. (2008). Evaluation of environmental impact assessment system in Pakistan. Journal of Environment Impact Assessment Review, 28(8), 562–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nadeem, O., & Fischer, T. B. (2011). An evaluation framework for effective public participation in EIA in Pakistan. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31(1), 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency (1997). Pakistan Environmental Protection Act (PEPA), 1997. Retrieved 2011, from www.environment.gov.pk, http://www.emc.com.pk/pdf/1-Act%201997.pdf.
  18. Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency (2000). Brief on Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved 2011, from www.environment.gov.pk, http://www.environment.gov.pk/aboutus/Brief-Pak-EPA.pdf.
  19. Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency (2005). Year book 2005 (Pak - EPA). Retrieved 2011, from www.environment.gov.pk, http://www.environment.gov.pk/aboutus/YB2004-2005.pdf.
  20. Petts, J. (1999). Handbook of environmental impact assessment: Environmental impact assessment in process, impact and limitations. Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell Science ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Riffat, R., & Khan, D. (2006). A review and evaluation of the environmental impact assessment process in Pakistan. Journal of Applied Science and Environmental Sanitation, 1, 17–29. ISSN.0126-2807.Google Scholar
  22. Rio declaration (1992). A short document produced at the 1992 United Nation’s “Conference on Environment and Development, Informally Known as the Earth Summit.”Google Scholar
  23. Saeed, A. (2004). Current EIA Practices: Problems and Issues. Proceedings of Capacity Building Workshop on EIA-A Tool to Achieve Sustainability. Islamabad: Pak-EPA.Google Scholar
  24. Say, N. P., Yucel, M., & Yilmazer, M. (2007). A computer-based system for environmental impact assessment (EIA) applications to energy power stations in Turkey: C- EDINFO. Journal of Energy Policy, 35(12), 6395–6401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sinclair, A. J., Diduck, A., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2008). Conceptualizing learning for sustainability through environmental assessment: Critical reflections on 15 years of research. Journal of Environment Impact Assessment Review, 28(7), 415–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thomas, I. (2001). Environmental impact assessment in Australia: Theory and Practice (3rd edn). Australia: Federation Press.Google Scholar
  27. UNEP (2002). UNEP Environmental Impact Assessment Training Resource Manual (2nd edn). Retrieved 2011, from www.unep.ch, http://www.unep.ch/etu/publications/EIAman_2edition_toc.htm.
  28. Wood C. W. (1995). Environmental impact assessment: A comparative review. London: Longman Group Limited.Google Scholar
  29. Wood, C. M. (2003). Environmental impact assessment: A comparative review (2nd edn). Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Zubair, S., Bowen, D., & Elwin, J. (2011). Not quite paradise: Inadequacies of environmental impact assessment in the Maldives. Journal of Tourism Management, 32(2), 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rashid Saeed
    • 1
  • Ayesha Sattar
    • 2
  • Zafar Iqbal
    • 2
  • Muhammad Imran
    • 2
    • 3
  • Raziya Nadeem
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Management ScienceCOMSATS Institute of Information TechnologySahiwal CampusPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Environmental SciencesInternational Islamic UniversityIslamabadPakistan
  3. 3.Islamabad Electric Supply Company (IESCO)IslamabadPakistan
  4. 4.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistryUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations