Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 184, Issue 2, pp 969–984 | Cite as

Characterization of atmospheric aerosols in the city of São Paulo, Brazil: comparisons between polluted and unpolluted periods

  • Taciana Toledo de Almeida Albuquerque
  • Maria de Fátima Andrade
  • Rita Yuri Ynoue


The objective of this study was to determine the size and composition of atmospheric aerosols in the downtown area of the city of São Paulo, Brazil, for a polluted and an unpolluted period. Aerosols were sampled with a portable air sampler (PAS), Micro-Orifice Uniform Deposit Impactor (MOUDI), and Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer. At the study site, air quality is poor, especially during the winter, high concentrations of pollutants being emitted primarily by the light- and heavy-duty vehicle fleet. We analyzed mass, black carbon (BC), Al, Si, P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Br, Rb, Sn, Zr, and Pb. During the polluted period, diurnal PM10 was higher than nocturnal PM10, whereas the inverse was true during the unpolluted period. The FPM was rich in BC, S, and Pb, whereas CPM was rich in Al, Si, Ca, Ti, and Fe. Mass balance was performed by category: ammonium sulfate, sodium chloride, crustal material, BC, and other. The PAS-determined FPM was mainly BC. The MOUDI-determined FPM crustal material explained more mass than did ammonium sulfate and BC during the polluted period, whereas ammonium sulfate had the largest mass during the unpolluted period. Crustal material was the major CPM component, followed by ammonium sulfate and BC. During the unpolluted period, FPM concentrations were lower, whereas those of ammonium sulfate were relatively higher, especially at night, and particle number was inversely proportional to particle size. Aerosol growth was more intense during the polluted period.


Atmospheric aerosol size distribution Mass balance Atmospheric aerosols composition Sao Paulo Air Pollution 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrade, M. F. (1993). Identificação de fontes da matéria particulada do aerossol atmosférico de São Paulo. Tese de Doutorado, IF-USP.Google Scholar
  2. Andrade, M. F., Orsini, C., & Maenhaut, W. (1994). Relation between aerosol sources and meteorological parameters for inhalable atmospheric particles in São Paulo city, Brazil. Atmospheric Environment, 28(14), 2307–2315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Artaxo, P., & Orsini, C. (1987). PIXE and receptor models applied to remote aerosol source apportionment in Brazil. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 22, 259–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asmi, E., Antola, M., Yli-Tuomi, T., Jantunen, M., Aarnio, P., Makela, T., et al. (2009). Driver and passenger exposure to aerosol particles in buses and trams in Helsinki, Finland. Science of the Total Environment, 407(8), 2860–2867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Binkowski, F. S., & Shankar, U. (1995). The regional particulate model 1. Model description and preliminary results. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(D12), 26191–26209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabada, J. C., Rees, S., Takahama, S., Khlystov, A., Pandis, S. N., Davidson, C. I., et al. (2004). Mass Size Distributions and size resolved chemical composition of fine particulate matter at the Pittsburgh supersite. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 3127–3141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castanho, A. D. A., & Artaxo, P. (2001). Wintertime and summertime São Paulo aerosol source apportionment study. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 4889–4902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CETESB (2002). Relatório de Qualidade do Ar no Estado de São Paulo. Companhia de Tecnologia de Saneamento Ambiental, São Paulo, Brasil Série Relatórios. http://www.cetesb.sp.gov.br/Ar/publicacoes.asp.
  9. CETESB (2007). Relatório de Qualidade do Ar no Estado de São Paulo. Companhia de Tecnologia de Saneamento Ambiental, São Paulo, Brasil Série Relatórios. http://www.cetesb.sp.gov.br/Ar/publicacoes.asp.
  10. Chow, J. C., Doraiswamy, P., Watson, J. G., Antony Chen, L. W., Hang Ho, S. S., & Soerman, D. A. (2008). Advances in integrated and continuous measurements for particle mass and chemical composition. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 58, 141–163. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.58.2.141. ISSN:1047-3289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chung, A., Chang, D. P. Y., Kleeman, M. J., Perry, K. D., Cahill, T. A., Dutcher, D., et al. (2001). Comparison of real-time instruments used to monitor airborne particulate matter. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 51, 109–120.Google Scholar
  12. Hughes, L. S., Cass, G. R., Gone, J., Ames, M., & Olmez, I. (1998). Physical and chemical characterization of the atmospheric ultrafine particles in the Los Angeles Area. Environmental Science & Technology, 32, 1153–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johansson, S. A. E., & Campbell, J. L. (1988). PIXE, a novel technique for elemental analysis. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Jun, M., & Stein, M. L. (2004). Statistical comparison of observed and CMAQ modeled daily sulfate levels. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 4427–4436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim, D., Gautam, M., & Gera, D. (2002). Parametric studies on the formation of diesel particulate matter via nucleation and coagulation modes. Journal of Aerosol Science, 33, 1609–1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marple, V. A., Rubow, K. L., Ananth, G. P., & Fissan, H. J. (1986). Micro-orifice uniform impactor. Journal of Aerosol Science, 17, 489–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McMurry, P., Wang, X., Park, K., & Ehara, K. (2002). The relationship between mass and mobility for atmospheric particles: a new technique for measuring particle density. Aerosol Science and Technology, 36, 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miranda, R. M., Andrade, M. F., Worobiec, A., & Grieken, R. V. (2002). Characterization of aerosol particles in São Paulo Metropolitan Area. Atmospheric Environment, 36, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morawska, L., Thomas, S., Gilbert, D., Greenaway, C., & Rijnders, E. (1999). A study of the horizontal and vertical profile of submicrometer particles in relation to a busy road. Atmospheric Environment, 33, 1261–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prospero, J. M., Charlson, R. J., Mohnen, V., Jaenicke, R., Delany, A. C., Moyers, J., et al. (1983). The atmospheric aerosol system: an overview. Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, 21(7), 1607–1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reid, J. S., Hobbs, P. V., Liousse, C., Martins, J. V., Weiss, R. E., & Erck, T. F. (1998). Comparison of techniques for measuring short-wave absorption and black carbon content of aerosol from biomass burning in Brazil. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(D24), 32031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sánchez-Ccoyllo, O. R., Ynoue, R. Y., Martins, L. D., & Andrade, M . F. (2006). Impacts of ozone precursor limitation and meteorological variables on ozone concentration in São Paulo, Brazil. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 552–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwartz, J. (1991). Air pollution and daily mortality in Philadelphia. Presented at the Meeting of the American Lung Association, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
  24. Seinfeld, J. H., & Pandis, S. N. (1998). Atmospheric chemistry and physics: From air pollution to climate change. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Spektor, D. M., Hofmeister, V. A., Artaxo, P., Brague, J. A. P., Echelar, F., Nogueira, D. P., et al. (1991). Effects of heavy industrial pollution on respiratory function in the children of Cubatao, Brazil: a preliminary report. Environmental Health Perspectives, 94, 51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tabacniks, M., Orsini, C., & Artaxo, P. (1987). PIXE analysis for air pollution source apportionment in urban areas of Brazil. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 22, 315–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Espen, P., Janssens, K., & Nobels, J. (1986). AXIL-PC software for the analysis of complex X-ray spectra. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1, 109–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Watson, J. G., Zhu, T., Chow, J. C., Engelbrecht, J., Fujita, E. M., & Wilson, W. E. (2002). Receptor modeling application framework for particle source apportionment. Chemosphere, 49, 1093–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ynoue, R. Y., & Andrade, M. F. (2004). Size-resolved mass balance of aerosol particles over the São Paulo Metropolitan Area of Brazil Aerosol Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  30. Yu, J. Z., Yang, H., Zhang, H. Y., & Lau, A. K. H. (2004). Size distributions of water-soluble organic carbon in ambient aerosols and its size-resolved thermal characteristics. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 1061–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhu, Y., & Hinds, W. C. (2002). Concentration and size distribution of ultrafine particles near a major highway. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 52, 1032–1042. ISSN:1047-3289.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taciana Toledo de Almeida Albuquerque
    • 1
  • Maria de Fátima Andrade
    • 1
  • Rita Yuri Ynoue
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Astronomy, Geophysics, and Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations