Skip to main content
Log in

Benefits of Bt cotton counterbalanced by secondary pests? Perceptions of ecological change in China

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 05 August 2012

Abstract

In the past, scientific research has predicted a decrease in the effectiveness of Bt cotton due to the rise of secondary and other sucking pests. It is suspected that once the primary pest is brought under control, secondary pests have a chance to emerge due to the lower pesticide applications in Bt cotton cultivars. Studies on this phenomenon are scarce. This article furnishes empirical evidence that farmers in China perceive a substantial increase in secondary pests after the introduction of Bt cotton. The research is based on a survey of 1,000 randomly selected farm households in five provinces in China. We found that the reduction in pesticide use in Bt cotton cultivars is significantly lower than that reported in research elsewhere. This is consistent with the hypothesis suggested by recent studies that more pesticide sprayings are needed over time to control emerging secondary pests, such as aphids, spider mites, and lygus bugs. Apart from farmers’ perceptions of secondary pests, we also assessed their basic knowledge of Bt cotton and their perceptions of Bt cotton in terms of its strengths and shortcomings (e.g., effectiveness, productivity, price, and pesticide use) in comparison with non-transgenic cotton.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett, R., Buthelezi, T. J., Ismael, Y., & Morse, S. (2003). Bt cotton, pesticides, labor and health: A case study of smallholder farmers in the Makhathini Flats, Republic of South Africa. Outlook on Agriculture, 32, 123–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, J. (1992). The epistemology of plant protection: Honduran campesino knowledge of pests and natural enemies. In: G. R. Sweetmore (Eds.), Proceedings of a seminar on crop protection for resource-poor farmers. Chatham, UK: Natural Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, R. J. C. (2000). BT transgenic crops: Risks and benefits. Integrated Pest Management Reviews, 5, 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, S., Mahon, R., & Olsen, K. (2007). Monitoring and adaptive resistance management in Australia for Bt-cotton: Current status and future challenges. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 95, 208–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gujar, G. T., Kalia, V., Kumari, A., Singh, B. P., Mittal, A., Nair, R., et al. (2007). Helicoverpa armigera baseline susceptibility to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins and resistance management for Bt cotton in India. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 95, 214–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hebei Bureau for Agriculture (2003). Summary of the incidence of other cotton diseases and pests in 2003 in hebei province (Hebeisheng 2003 Nian Mianhua Qita Bingchong Fasheng Zongjie). Internal Government Report 13, Shijiazhuang.

  • Heisey, P. (1990). Accelerating the transfer of wheat breeding gains to farmers: A study of the dynamics of varietal replacement in Pakistan. CIMMYT Research Report, No. 1. Mexico: CIMMYT.

  • Ho, P., Zhao, J. H., & Xue, D. (2009). Access and control of agro-biotechnology: Bt botton, ecological change and risk in China. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36, 345–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, H.-H., & Gale, F. (2001). Regional shifts in China’s cotton production and use. Cotton and wool situation outlook 2001. Economic Research Service, USDA, November 2001, pp. 19–25.

  • Huang, J. K., Rozelle, S., Pray, C., & Wang, Q. F. (2001). Plant biotechnology in China. Science, 285, 674–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. K., Hu, R. F., Pray, C., Qiao, F. B., & Rozelle, S. (2003). Biotechnology as an alternative to chemical pesticides: a case study of Bt cotton in China. Agricultural Economics, 29, 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications) (2007). Global status of commercialized Biotech/GM crops: 2007. ISAAA Brief 37-2007. http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/37/executivesummary retrieved on 16-01-2009.

  • Jost, P., Shurley, D., Culpepper, S., Roberts, P., Nichols, R., Reeves, J., et al. (2008). Economic comparison of transgenic and nontransgenic cotton production systems in Georgia. Agronomy Journal, 100, 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, S. (2006). Seven-year glitch: Cornell warns that Chinese GM cotton farmers are losing money due to ‘secondary’ pests. http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/july06/bt.cotton.china.ssl.html. Accessed 31 July 2006.

  • Li, G., Wu, K., Gould, F., Wang, J., Jin, M., Gao, X., et al. (2007). Increasing tolerance to Cry1Ac cotton from cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, was confirmed in Bt cotton farming area of China. Ecological Entomology, 32, 366–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Men, X., Feng, G., Edwards, C. A., & Yardim, E. N. (2004). Influence of pesticide applications on pest and predatory arthropods associated with transgenic Bt cotton and nontransgenic cotton plants in China. Phytoparasitica, 32, 246–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (2003). China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pray, C., Ma, D. M., Huang, J. K., Hu, R. F., Zhang, L. X., & Rozelle, S. (2001). Impact of Bt cotton in China. World Development, 29, 813–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pray, C., Huang, J. K., Hu, R. F., & Rozelle, S. (2002). Five years of Bt cotton in China: The benefits continue. The Plant Journal, 31, 423–430.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qaim, M. (2003). Bt cotton in India: Field trial results and economic projections. World Development, 31, 2115–2127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, J. (2008). Agriculture: Is China ready for GM rice? Nature, 455, 850–852.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, B., Patra, A. K., & Purakayastha, T. J. (2008). Transgenic Bt-cotton affects enzyme activity and nutrient availability in a sub-tropical Inceptisol. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 194(4), 289–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shantharam, S., Sullia, S. B., & Shivakumara, S. G. (2008). Peer review contestations in the era of transgenic crops. Current Science, 95, 167–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirtle, C., Beyers, L., Ismael, Y., & Piesse, J. (2003). Can GM-technologies help the poor? The impact of Bt cotton in Makhathini Flats, KwaZulu-Natal. World Development, 31, 717–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trutmann, P., Voss, J., & Fairhead, J. (1996). Local knowledge and farmer perceptions of bean diseases in the Central African Highlands. Agriculture and Human Values, 13, 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnipseed, S. G., Sullivan, M. J., Mann, J. E., & Roof, M. E. (1995). Secondary pests in transgenic Bt cotton in South Carolina. Beltwide Cotton Conferences (USA), January 4–7, 1995. Texas: San Antonio.

  • Viktorov, A. G. (2008). Influence of Bt-plants on soil Biota and Pleiotropic effect of delta-endotoxin-encoding genes. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 55, 738–747.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vitale, J., Glick, H., Greenplate, J., Abdeennadher, M., & Traoré, O. (2008). Second-generation Bt cotton field trials in Burkina Faso: Analyzing the potential benefits to West African farmers. Crop Science, 48, 1958–1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Just, D. R., & Pinstrup-Andersen, P. (2006). Damage from secondary pests and the need for refuge in China. Natural Resource Management and Policy, 30, 625–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Just, D. R., & Pinstrup-Andersen, P. (2008). Bt-cotton and secondary pests. International Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z.-j., Lin, H., & Huang, J.-k. (2009). Scott Rozelle and Carl Pray. Bt Cotton in China: Are Secondary Insect Infestations Offsetting the Benefits in Farmer Fields? (Vol. 8(1), pp.83–90). Agricultural Sciences in China.

  • Wu, K. M. (2007). Monitoring and management strategy for Helicoverpa armigera resistance to Bt cotton in China. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 95, 220–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, N., Fok, M., Bai, L., & Zhou, Z. (2008). Eoffectiveness and chemical pest control of Bt-cotton in the Yangtze River, Valley, China. Crop Protection, 27, 1269–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G. F., Wan, F. H., Murphy, S. T., Guo, J. Y., & Liu, W. X. (2008). Reproductive biolop, of two nontarget insect species, Aphis gossypii (Homoptera: Aphididae) and Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), on Bt and non-Bt cotton cultivars. Environmental Entomology, 37, 1035–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J. H., & Ho, P. (2005). A developmental risk society? Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in China. International Journal for Environment and Sustainable Development, 4, 370–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Ho.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2699-5

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, J.H., Ho, P. & Azadi, H. Benefits of Bt cotton counterbalanced by secondary pests? Perceptions of ecological change in China. Environ Monit Assess 173, 985–994 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1439-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1439-y

Keywords

Navigation