Abstract
Laboratory investigations were conducted to test the toxicity of aged petroleum sludge collected from Shengli Oil Field, the second largest oilfield in China, to earthworm Eisenia fetida. Various end points were measured in the earthworms, including mortality, growth, cocoon output, juvenile production, and avoidance behavioral response, to determine their comparative sensitivity for assessing harmful effects of petroleum-hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. The results showed that all these assays responded in a concentration-dependent manner, and two chronic end points, juvenile production and cocoon output, as well as avoidance behavioral response appeared to be sensitive end points for detecting toxicity of petroleum-hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Comparatively, juvenile production exhibited similar sensitivity to avoidance behavior response, both of which were more sensitive than cocoon output, while mortality and adult growth were proposed as the least sensitive parameters. It was suggested that large amounts of petroleum sludge deposited in Shengli Oil Field may pose a potential threat to the local ecosystem, and the utility of multiple effects-based end points in earthworm E. fetida is useful to facilitate ecological risk assessments in hydrocarbon-contaminated sites.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Mutairi, N., Bufarsan, A., & Al-Rukaibi, F. (2008). Ecorisk evaluation and treatability potential of soils contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbon-based fuels. Chemosphere, 74, 142–148.
Booth, L. H., Heppelthwaite, V. J., & O’Halloran, K. (2005). Effects-based assays in the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa: Their utilization for evaluation of contaminated sites before and after remediation. Journal of Soils & Sediments, 5, 87–94.
Crane, M., & Byrns, G. (2002). Review of ecotoxicological and biological test methods for the assessment of contaminated land. Bristol: United Kingdom Environmental Agency.
Dawson, J. J. C., Godsiffe, E. J., Thompson, I. P., Ralebitso-Senior, T. K., Killham, K. S., & Paton, G. I. (2007). Application of biological indicators to assess recovery of hydrocarbon impacted soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 39, 164–177.
Dorn, P. B., & Salanitro, J. P. (2000). Temporal ecological assessment of oil contaminated soils before and after bioremediation. Chemosphere, 40, 419–426.
Dorn, P. B., Vipond, T. E., Salanitro, J. P., & Wisniewski, H. L. (1998). Assessment of the acute toxicity of crude oils in soils using earthworms, MicrotoxⓇ, and plants. Chemosphere, 37, 845–860.
Efroymson, R. A., Sample, B. E., & Peterson, M. J. (2004). Ecotoxicity test data for total petroleum hydrocarbons in soil: Plants and soil-dwelling invertebrates. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 10, 207–231.
Environment Canada (2004). Biological test method: Tests for toxicity of contaminated soil to earthworms (Eisenia andrei, Eisenia fetida, or Lumbricus terrestris). EPS 1/RM/43. Method Development and Applications Section, Environment Technology Center, Environment Canada.
Environment Canada (2005). Guidance document on statistical methods for environmental toxicity tests. EPS 1/RM/46. Method development and applications section, Environmental Technology Center, Environment Canada.
Huang, X. D., El-Alawi, Y., Penrose, D. M., Glick, B. R., & Greenberg, B. M. (2004). Responses of three grass species to creosote during phytoremediation. Environmental Pollution, 130, 453–463.
Hubálek, T., Vosáhlova, S., Matějů, V., Kováěová, N., & Novotný, C. (2007). Ecotoxicity monitoring of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil during bioremediation: A case study. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 52, 1–7.
ISO (1998). Soil quality—effects of pollutant on earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Part 2: Determination of effects on reproduction. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. ISO 11268-2:1998.
ISO (2005). Soil quality—avoidance test for testing the quality of soils and effects of chemicals on behaviour. Part 1: Tests with earthworms (Eisenia fetida and Eisenia andrei). Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. ISO/DIS 17512-1.
Jensen, J., & Mesman, M. (Eds.) (2006). Ecological risk assessment of contaminated land. Decision support for site-specific investigations. RIVM, Bilthoven.
Kuang, S. P., Sun, D. Y., Sun, Y. H., & Zhao, H. (2008). Pollution characteristics of PAHs in oily sludge and around soils of Zhongyuan Oil Field. Journal of Agro-Environmental Science, 27, 855–861. (In Chinese)
Lansdell, S., & McConnell, S. (2003). Ecological considerations in setting soil criteria for total petroleum hydrocarbons (<C15) and naphthalene. In A. Langley, M. Gilbey, & B. Kennedy (Eds). Proceedings of the fifth national workshop on the assessment of site contamination. Adelaide: NEPC Service Corporation.
Leng, Y. H., Guo, S. H., Nie, Y. B., Sun, T. H., Zhou, Q., & Sun, P. (2006). Effects of petroleum exploitation on ecological environment of reed fields in Liaohe River Delta. Journal of Agro-Environmental Science, 25, 161–164. (In Chinese)
Liu, W. X., Luo, Y. M., Teng, Y., Li, Z. G., & Wu, L. H. (2007). A survey of petroleum contamination in several Chinese oilfield soils. Soils, 39, 247–251. (In Chinese)
Lv, Z., Zeng, F. G., Xue, N. D., Guo, G. L., Lu, G. L., Liu, L., et al. (2008). Contamination and vertical distribution characteristics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at an oil sludge storage site. Research of Environmental Sciences, 21, 85–89. (In Chinese)
Molina-Barahona, L., Vega-Loyo, L., Guerrero, M., Ramirez, S., Romero, I., Vega-Jarquin, C., et al. (2005). Ecotoxicological evaluation of diesel-contaminated soil before and after a bioremediation process. Environmental Toxicology, 20, 100–109.
Neuhauser, E. F., Norton, R. A., Loehr, R. C., & Sillman, D. Y. (1989). Earthworm and soil microarthropod responses to oily waste application. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 21, 275–281.
Phillips, T. M., Liu, D., Seech, A. G., Lee, H., & Trevors, J. T. (2000). Monitoring bioremediation in creosote-contaminated soils using chemical analysis and toxicity tests. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 24, 132–139.
Pirhonen, R., & huhta, V. (1984). Petroleum fractions in soil: Effects on populations of Nematoda, Enchytraeidae and Microarthropoda. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 16, 347–350.
Plaza, G., Nalecz-Jawecki, G., Ulfig, K., & Brigmon, R. L. (2005). The application of bioassays as indicators of petroleum-contaminated soil remediation. Chemosphere, 59, 289–296.
Salanitro, J. P. (2001). Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil. Advances in Agronomy, 72, 53–105.
Salanitro, J. P., Dorn, P. B., Huesemann, M. H., Moore, K. O., Rhodes, I. A., Rice Jackson, L. M., et al. (1997). Crude oil hydrocarbon bioremediation and soil ecotoxicity assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 31, 1769–1776.
Saterbak, A., Toy, R. J., McMain, B. J., Williams, M. P., & Dorn, P. B. (2000). Ecotoxicological and analytical assessment of effects of bioremediation on hydrocarbon-contaminating soils. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 19, 2643–2652.
Saterbak, A., Toy, R. J., Wong, D. C. L., McMain, B. J., Williams, M. P., Dorn, P. B., et al. (1999). Ecotoxicological and analytical assessment of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils and application to ecological risk assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18, 1591–1607.
Schaefer, M. (2003). Behavioural endpoints in earthworm ecotoxicology: Evaluation of different test systems in soil toxicity assessment. Journal of Soils & Sediments, 3, 79–84.
Shakir-Hanna, S. H., & Weaver, R. W. (2002). Earthworm survival in oil contaminated soil. Plant and Soil, 240, 127–132.
Shin, K. H., & Kim, K. W. (2001). Ecotoxicity monitoring of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil using earthworm (Eisenia fetida). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 70, 93–103.
USEPA (1997). Ecological risk assessment guidance for superfund: Process for designing and conducting ecological risk assessments (interim final). Washington DC: United State Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/540/R-97/006.
Van Gestel, C. A. M., Vander Waarde, J. J., Derksen, J. G. M., Vander Hoek, E. E., Veul, M. F. X. W., Bouwens, S., et al. (2001). The use of acute and chronic bioassays to determine the ecological risk and bioremediation efficiency of oil-polluted soils. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 20, 1438–1449.
Vaajasaari, K., Joutti, A., Schultz, E., Selonen, S., & Westerholm, H. (2002). Comparisons of terrestrial and aquatic bioassays for oil-contaminated soil toxicity. Journal of Soils & Sediments, 4, 194–202.
Victorian EPA (1990). Acceptance criteria in the clean-up notice for the Bayside site. Australia: The Environment Protection Authority (EPA) of Victoria.
WADoE (2003). Assessment levels for soil, sediment and water. Draft for public comment. Version 3, Contaminated Sites Management Series. Department of Environment, Western Australia.
Wong, D. C. L., Chai, E. Y., Chu, K. K., & Dorn, P. B. (1999). Prediction of ecotoxicity of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils using physiochemical parameters. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 18, 2611–2621.
Wu, L. H., Wang, Z. Q., & Wu, H. (1999). Approach on the status quo of oily sand and its treatment process in Shengli Oil Field. Shanghai Environmental Sciences, 18, 96–97. (In Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, SJ., Yan, ZG., Guo, GL. et al. Ecotoxicity assessment of aged petroleum sludge using a suite of effects-based end points in earthworm Eisenia fetida . Environ Monit Assess 169, 417–428 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1184-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1184-2