Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Extensive tree health monitoring networks are useful in revealing the impacts of widespread biotic damage in boreal forests

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We surveyed the regional distribution of conifer defoliation in Finland with an extensive monitoring network during 1995–2006 (EU Forest Focus Level I). The average defoliation in the whole Finland was 10.3% in pine and 19.9% in spruce. The sharp changes were often related to abiotic and biotic factors. The mean age of the stand explained more than one half of the between-plot variance in defoliation. In a variance component analysis, the main effect of years was negligible, while most of the random variation was due to plot main effect and plot × year interaction. About one fifth of the defoliation could be attributed to abiotic or biotic damage, and there were strong local correlations, e.g., between the changes in defoliation and degree of pine sawfly (Diprionidae) damage. There were clear temporal and spatial patterns in the incidence of the most important causes [Scots pine: Scleroderris canker (Gremmeniella abietina), pine shoot beetles (Tomicus sp.), and pine sawflies (Diprion pini, Neodiprion sertifer); Norway spruce: rust fungi (primarily Chrysomyxa ledi)]. Our results suggest that extensive monitoring networks can reveal useful information about the widespread outbreaks of pest organisms (insects and fungi) already in their increase phases, giving some time for management decisions. In a changing climate, large-scale, regular monitoring of tree health, including abiotic and biotic causes, is more important than ever before.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, S. A., & Palmer, C. J. (1999). Forest health monitoring in the United States: First four years. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 55, 267–277.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Commission Regulation (EC). (1995). No.1398/95 amending Regulation (EEC) No. 1696/87 (inventories, network, reports). Brussels: 1995, Official Journal of European Communities No. L139/4 of 22 June 1995. 2 p.

  • de Vries, W., Klap, J. M., & Erisman, J. W. (2000). Effects of environmental stress on forest crown condition in Europe. Part I: Hypotheses and approach to the study. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 119, 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, C. B., & Burk, T. E. (2006). A simulation study to assess the sensitivity of a forest health monitoring network to outbreaks of defoliating insects. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 122, 289–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, C. B., & Burk, T. E. (2007). Demonstration and verification of a model that generates defoliation patterns in forested landscapes. Ecological Modelling, 205, 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti, M. (1997). Forest health assessment and monitoring—Issues for consideration. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 48, 45–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hongisto, M. (2003a). Hilatar, a limited area simulation model for acid contaminants. Part I. Model description and verification. Atmospheric Environment, 37, 1535–1547.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hongisto, M. (2003b). Modelling of the transport of nitrogen and sulphur contaminants to the Baltic Sea Region. FMI Contributions, 40, 188 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hongisto, M., Sofiev, M., & Joffre, S. (2003). Hilatar, a limited area simulation model for acid contaminants. Part II. Long-term simulations results. Atmospheric Environment, 37, 1549–1560.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ICP Forests. (2004). Assessment of damage causes. Submanual for manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests (4th ed.). UN/ECE, Convention on Long-Range Transboundery Air Pollution, International Co-Operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests. Updated June 2004. Retrieved from http://www.icp-forests.org/bioticdocs/manual-index.pdf.

  • Innes, J. L. (1993). Methods to estimate forest health. Silva Fennica, 27, 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. L., & Schwyzer, A. (1994). Stem damage in Swiss Forests: Incidence, causes and relations to crown transparency. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 24, 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jukola-Sulonen, E.-L., Mikkola, K., & Salemaa, M. (1990). The vitality of conifers in Finland, 1986–88. In: P. Kauppi, P. Anttila & K. Kenttämies (Eds.), Acidification in Finland (pp. 523–560). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandler, O., & Innes, J. (1995). Air pollution and forest decline in Central Europe. Environmental Pollution, 90, 171–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, M., McCarthy, R., & Hogan, J. (1989). Forest health surveys in Ireland: 1987 and 1988 results. Irish Forestry, 46, 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kujala, V. (1979). Forest types of Finland. In Finnish with English summary. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae, 92, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, M., Salemaa, M., & Tamminen, P. (2000). Forest condition in relation to environmental factors. In: E. Mälkönen (Ed.) Forest condition in a changing environment—The Finnish case. Forestry sciences (vol. 65, pp. 142–155). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, M., Nevalainen, S., Pouttu, A., Rantanen, H., & Salemaa, M. (2005). Metsäpuiden elinvoimaisuuden arviointi.Maasto-ohje (Field Guide). Metsäntutkimuslaitos. 38 p.

  • Lindroos, A.-J., Derome, J., & Derome, K. (2007). Open area bulk deposition and stand throughfall in Finland during 2001–2004. In: P. Merilä, T. Kilponen & J. Derome (Eds.), Forest condition monitoring in Finland—National report 2002–2005. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Res. Inst. (vol. 45, pp. 81–92).

  • Lorenz, M. (1993). Die Europäische Waldzustandserfassung. Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschultz, 2, 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, M., Fischer, R., Becher, G., Granke, O., Riedel, T., Roskams, P., et al. (2007). Forest condition in Europe. 2007. Technical Report. BFH, Hamburg, (91 pp.), Annexes.

  • Lorenz, M., Fischer, R., Becher, G., Granke, O., Seidling, W., Ferretti, M., et al. (2008). Forest condition in Europe. 2008. Technical reports of ICP Forests. Work report of the Institute for World Forestry 2008/1, (107 pp.), Annexes.

  • Manion, P. D. (1981). Tree disease concepts (pp. 399). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mälkönen, E., Helmisaari, H.-S., Lindgren, M., & Raitio, H. (2000). Forest condition in Finland—Concluding remarks. In: E. Mälkönen (Ed.) Forest condition in a changing environment—The Finnish case. Forestry sciences (vol. 65, pp. 361–367). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevalainen, S. (1999). Nationwide forest damage surveys in Finland. In: B. Forster, M. Knizek & W. Grodzki (Eds.), Methodology of forest insect and disease survey in Central Europe. Second Workshop of the IUFRO Working Party 7.03.10 (pp. 24–29). Sion-Chateauneuf, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevalainen, S., & Heinonen, J. (2000). Dynamics of defoliation, biotic and abiotic damage during 1986–1998. In: E. Mälkönen (Ed.), Forest condition in a changing environment—The Finnish case. Forestry sciences (pp. 133–141). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevalainen, S., Lindgren, M., & Pouttu, A. (2007). Biotic and abiotic damage on the Level I network. In: P. Merilä, T. Kilponen & J. Derome (Eds.), Forest condition monitoring in Finland—National Report 2002–2005. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute (vol. 45, pp. 32–40).

  • Peltola, A. (2005). Finnish statistical yearbook of forestry 2005. SVT agriculture, forestry and fishery 2005. Metsäntutkimuslaitos, 45, (424 pp.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, B. (1985). Symptomatik und mögliche Ursachen der Waldschäden. Forschungsergebisse zur Problematik der Neuartigen Waldschäden. LIS-Berichte, 57, 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfern, D., & Hendry, S. (2002). Climate change and damage to trees caused by extremes of temperature. Forestry Commission Bulletin, 125, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouault, G., Candeau, J. N., Lieutuer, F., Martin, J. C., Grégoire, J. C., Nageleisen, L. M., et al. (2006). Effect of drought and heat on forest insect populations in relation to the 2003 drought in Western Europe. Annals of Forest Science, 63, 611–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salemaa, M., Jukola-Sulonen, E.-L., & Lindgren, M. (1991). Forest condition in Finland, 1986–1990. Silva Fennica, 25, 147–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelhaas, M. J., Nabuurs, G. J., & Schuck, A. (2003). Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries. Global Change Biology, 9, 1620–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, M., Cachier, H., Ebinghaus, R., Ferm, M., Hongisto, M., Iverfeldt, A., et al. (1999). Evolution of the aerosol composition in the BASYS Network study and Lagrangian experiments in summer 1997 and winter 1998. Journal of the Aerosol Science, 30, S97–S98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, S. R., Casella, G., & Mcculloch, C. E. (1992). Variance components (pp. 501). New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seidling, W., & Mues, V. (2005). Statistical and geostatistical modelling of preliminarily adjusted defoliation on an European scale. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 101, 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sioen, G., & Roskams, P. (Eds.) (2006). Crown condition of Quercus robur in Flanders (Belgium). Symposium: Forests in a changin g Environment—Results of 20 years ICP Forests Monitoring, Göttingen, 25.-28.10. 2006. J.D.Sauer’s Verlag. Schriften aus der Forstlichen Fakultät der Universität Göttingen und der Nordwestdeutschen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt 142, (210–215 pp.).

  • Skelly, J. M., & Innes, J. L. (1994). Waldsterben in the forests of Central Europe and eastern North America: Fantasy or reality? Plant Disease, 78, 1021–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofiev, M., Petersen, G., Krüger, O., Schneider, B., Hongisto, M., & Jylhä, K. (2001). Model simulations of the atmospheric trace metals, concentrations and depositions over the Baltic Sea. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 1395–1409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, M. G., & Nellemann, C. (1994). Isolation of natural factors affecting crown density and crown color in coniferous forest: Implications for monitoring in forest decline. Ambio, 23, 251–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuovinen, J. P., & Simpson, D. (2008). An aerodynamic correction for the European ozone risk assessment methodology. Atmospheric Environment, 42, 8371–8381.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UN/ECE. (1998). Manual on methodologies and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forest (4th ed.). Hamburg/Geneva: Programme Co-ordinating Centres.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN/ECE. (2004). Manual on methodologies and criteria for modelling and mapping critical loads and levels and air pollution effects, risks and trends. Retrieved from http://www.icpmapping.org.

  • Varama, M., & Niemelä, P. (2001). Männiköiden neulastuholaiset (the defoliators in Scots pine forests, in Finnish). Metsätieteen aikakauskirja—Folia Forestalia2/2001, 275–279.

  • Wermelinger, B. (2004). Ecology and management of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus—A review of recent research. Forest Ecology and Management, 202, 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, S., Hansson, P., & Witzell, J. (2006). The applicability of national forest inventories for estimating forest damage outbreaks—Experiences from a Gremmeniella outbreak in Sweden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 2605–2613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev, Z., Bergströn, R., Brandt, J., Hongisto, M., Jonson, J. E., Lagner, J., et al. (2001). Studying sensitivity of air pollution levels caused by variations of different key parameters. TemaNord, 2001, 569.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Joensuu Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute, P.O. Box 68, 80101, Joensuu, Finland

    Seppo Nevalainen, Jaakko Heinonen & Seppo Neuvonen

  2. Vantaa Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute, P.O. Box 18, 01301, Vantaa, Finland

    Martti Lindgren & Antti Pouttu

  3. Air Quality Research, Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, 00101, Helsinki, Finland

    Marke Hongisto

Authors
  1. Seppo Nevalainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martti Lindgren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antti Pouttu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jaakko Heinonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marke Hongisto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Seppo Neuvonen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seppo Nevalainen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nevalainen, S., Lindgren, M., Pouttu, A. et al. Extensive tree health monitoring networks are useful in revealing the impacts of widespread biotic damage in boreal forests. Environ Monit Assess 168, 159–171 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1100-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1100-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation