Water chemistry influences the toxicity of silver to the green-lipped mussel Perna viridis
- 97 Downloads
The study determined the influence and relative importance of water chemistry parameters (pH, alkalinity, hardness) on the acute toxicity of silver to the green mussel Perna viridis. A preliminary bioassay revealed that 4 mg L − 1 of silver caused 50% mortality (LC50) in 96 h for mussels placed in seawater with pH 8.5, hardness 1,872 mg L − 1, and alkalinity 172 mg L − 1. Mortality of mussels increased with decreasing pH and increasing hardness and alkalinity variables. In contrast the mortality decreased with increasing pH and decreasing hardness and alkalinity values. The water chemistry also affected the concentration of sliver in experimental seawater and bioaccumulation of silver in mussels. The results revealed that the chemical properties of seawater must be considered while conducting toxicity tests with metals like silver. The possible explanations for the influence of water chemistry on silver toxicity to P. viridis are discussed.
KeywordsWater chemistry Toxicity pH Silver Perna viridis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- APHA, AWWA, WEF (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20th ed.). Washington DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation.Google Scholar
- APHA (1992). Bioassay Methods for aquatic organisms. In Standard method for the examination of water and wastewater (18th ed., pp. 685–743). Washington, DC: American Public Health Associations, American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Federation.Google Scholar
- Bianchini, A., & Wood, C. M. (2003). Mechanism of acute silver toxicity in Daphnia magna. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 22(6), 1361–1367.Google Scholar
- Campbell, P. G. (1995). Interactions between trace metals and aquatic organisms: A critique of the free-ion activity model. In A. Tessier, & D. R. Turner (Eds.), Metal speciation and bioavailability in aquatic systems (pp. 45–102). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Campbell, P. G., & Stokes, P. M. (1985). Acidification and toxicity of metal to aquatic biota. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 42, 2034–2049.Google Scholar
- Crist, R. H., Martin, J. R., Carr, D., Watson, J. R., Clarke, H. J., & Crist, D. R. (1994). Interaction of metals and protons with algae. Ion exchange vs adsorption models and reassessment of Scatchard plots; ion-exchange rates and equilibria compared with calcium alginate. Environmental Science & Technology, 28, 1859–1866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Finney, D. J. (1971). Probit analysis. 3rd edn. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Schubauer-Berigan, M. K., Dierkes, J. R., Monson, P. D., & Ankley, G. T. (1993). pH-dependent toxicity of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn to Ceriodaphnia dubia, Pimephales promelas, Hyalella azteca, and Lumbriculus variegates. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 12, 1261–1266.Google Scholar
- Yap, C. K., Ismail, A., & Tan, S. G. (2003). Can the byssus of green-lipped mussel Perna viridis (Linnaeus) from the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia be a biomonitoring organ for Cd, Pb and Zn? Field and laboratory studies. Environmental Interpretation, 29, 521–528.Google Scholar