Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 152, Issue 1–4, pp 167–177 | Cite as

Indicating appropriate groundwater tables for desert river-bank forest at the Tarim River, Xinjiang, China

  • Xing-Ming Hao
  • Ya-Ning Chen
  • Wei-Hong Li


Based on data collected over 2 years of monitoring the lower reaches of the Tarim River, the groundwater table depth was divided into six classes; 0 to 2 m, 2 to 4 m, 4 to 6 m, 6 to 8 m, 8 to 10 m, >10 m. We investigated the vegetation in this area to measure the influence of groundwater table depth on plant diversity and species ecological niche. The results indicated that plant diversity was highest at the 2 to 4 m groundwater table depth, followed by that at 4 to 6 m, and then that at 0 to 2 m. When the groundwater depth dropped to below 6 m, species diversity decreased dramatically, and the slope of Hill’s index tended to level off. The ecological niche of the major species in this area initially expanded as the groundwater level dropped. The widest niche appeared at the 4 to 6 m groundwater table depth and gradually narrowed with deepening groundwater. Ecological niche analysis also revealed that the 4 to 6 m groundwater table depth was associated with the lowest degree of niche overlap and the richest variety of species. Our findings indicate that in the lower reaches of the Tarim River, the groundwater table depth must be a minimum of 6 m for vegetation restoration; it should be maintained at 2 to 4 m in the vicinity of the water path, and at 4 to 6 m for the rest of this arid area.


Plant diversity Ecological niche breadth Ecological niche overlap Lower reaches of Tarim River Groundwater table depth 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrams, P. (1980). Some comments on measuring niche overlap. Ecology, Durham, 61, 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alatalo, R. U. (1981). Problems in the measurement of evenness in ecology. Oikos, 37, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brochway, D. G. (1998). Forest plant diversity at local and landscape scales in the Cascade Mountains of southwestern Washington. Forest Ecology and Management, 109, 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, Y. N., Li, W. H., Chen, Y. P., Zhang, H. F., & Zhuang, L. (2004). Physiological response of natural plants to the change of groundwater level in the lower reaches of Tarim River, Xinjiang. Progress in Natural Science, 14, 975–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Y. J., Zhou, K. F., Chen, Y. N., Li, W. H., Liu, J. Z., & Wang, T. (2007). Response of Groundwater chemistry to water deliveries in the lower reaches of Tarim River, Northwest China. Environmental Geology, 53, 1365–1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, Y. N., Zilliacus, H., Li, W. H., Zhang, H. F., & Chen, Y. P. (2006). Groundwater level affects plant species diversity along the lower reaches of the Tarim River, Western China. Journal of Arid Environments, 66, 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chesson, P. (1991). A need for niches? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 6, 26–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colwell, R. K., & Futuyma, D. J. (1971). On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology, 52, 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gries, D., Zeng, F., Foetzki, A., Arndt, S. K., Bruelheide, H., Thomas, F. M., et al. (2003). Growth and water relations of Tamarix ramosissima and Populus euphratica on Taklamakan desert dunes in relation to depth to a permanent water table. Plant Cell & Environment, 26, 725–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hill, M. O. (1973). Reciprocal averaging, an eigenvector method of ordination. Journal of Ecology, 61, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hipondoka, M. H. T., Araniba, J. N., Chirara, C., Lihavha, M., & Macko, S. A. (2003). Vertical distribution of grass and tree roots in arid eco-systems of Southern Africa: Niche differentiation of competition. Journal of Arid Environments, 54, 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horton, J. L., & Clark, J. L. (2001). Water table decline alters growth and survival of Salix gooddingii and Tamarix chinensis seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management, 140, 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Horton, J. L., & Hart, S. C. (1998). Hydrauliclift: A potentially important eco-system process. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 232–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hou, P., Beeton, R. J. S., Carter, R. W., Dong, X. G., & Li, X. (2007). Response to environmental flows in the lower Tarim River, Xinjiang, China: Ground water. Journal of Environmental Management, 83(4), 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hughes, F. M. R. (1990). The influence of flooding regimes on forest distribution and composition in the Tana River Floodplain, Kenya. Journal of Applied Ecology, 27, 475–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lammerts, E. J., Maas, C., & Grootjan, A. P. (2001). Groundwater variables and vegetation in dune slacks. Ecological Engineering, 17(1), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lamontagne, S., Cook, P. G., O’Grady, A., & Eamus, D. (2005). Groundwater use by vegetation in a tropical savanna riparian zone (Daly River, Australia). Journal of Hydrology, 310, 280–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levins, R. (1968). Evolution in changing environments: Some theoretical explorations. Princeton: Basin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Lite, S. J., Bagstad, K. J., & Stromberg, J. C. (2005). Riparian plant species richness along lateral and longitudinal gradients of water stress and flood disturbance, San Pedro River, Arizona, USA. Journal of Arid Environments, 63(4), 785–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu, J. Z., Chen, Y. N., Chen, Y. J., Zhang, N., & Li, W. H. (2005). Degradation of populus euphratica community in the lower reaches of the Tarim River, Xinjiang, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 17(5), 740–747.Google Scholar
  21. Liu, Y. B., Chen, Y. N., & Deng, J. M. (2007). Saving the “Green Corridor” recharging groundwater to restore riparian forest along the lower Tarim River, China. Ecological Restoration, 25(2), 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lusk, C. H., & Smith, B. (1998). Life history difference and species coexistence in an old-growth New Zealand rain forest. Ecology, 79, 795–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mahdi, A., Law, R., & Willis, A. J. (1989). Large niche overlaps among coexisting plant species in a limestone grassland community. Journal of Ecology, 77, 386–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahoney, J. M., & Rood, S. B. (1992). Response of a hybrid poplar to water table decline in different substrates. Forest Ecology and Management, 54, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Margalef, R. (1958). Information theory in ecology. General Systems, 3, 36–71.Google Scholar
  26. Munoz-Reinoso, J. C. (2001). Vegetation changes and groundwater abstraction in SW Donana, Spain. Journal of Hydrology, 242(3/4), 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Patil, G. P., & Tailie, C. (1982). Diversity as a concept and its measurement. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 548–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pianka, E. R. (1974). Niche overlap and diffuse competition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 71, 2141–2145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reineking, B., Veste, M., Wissel, C., & Huth, A. (2006). Environmental variability and allocation trade-offs maintain species diversity in a process-based model of succulent plant communities. Ecological Modelling, 199(4), 486–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Riis, T., & Hawes, I. (2002). Relationships between water level fluctuations and vegetation diversity in shallow water of New Zealand lakes. Aquatic Botany, 74, 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Robbins, B. D., & Bell, S. S. (2000). Dynamics of a subtidal seagrass landscape: Seasonal and annual change in relation to water depth. Ecology, 81, 1193–1205.Google Scholar
  32. Romme, W. H. (1982). Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park. Ecological Monographs, 52, 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ruan, X., Wang, Q., Chen, Y. N., & Li, W. H. (2007). Physiological response of riparian plants to watering in hyper-arid areas of Tarim River, China. Frontiers of Biology in China, 2, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schoener, T. W. (1974). Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science, 185, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shafroth, P. B., Stromberg, J. C., & Pattern, D. T. (2002). Riparian vegetation response to altered disturbance and stress regimes. Ecological Society of America, 12, 107–123.Google Scholar
  36. Shannon, C. E., & Weiner, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Unknown Distance Function. Urbana: Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  37. Silvertown, J. W., & Law, R. (1987). Do plants need niches?—Some recent developments on plant community ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2, 24–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Song, Y. D., & Fan, Z. L. (2000). The water resource and ecology in Tarim River, China. Xinjiang: People Press, Urumqi (In Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
  39. Wang, T., Zhu, Z. D., & Wu, W. (2002). Sandy desertification in the north of China. Science in China (series D), 45(Supp), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu, H. L., Ye, M., & Li, J. M. (2007). Changes in groundwater levels and the response of natural vegetation to transfer of water to the lower reaches of The Tarim River. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 19, 1199–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zencich, S. J., Froend, R. H., Turner, J. V., & Gailitis, V. (2002). Influence of groundwater depth on the seasonal sources of water accessed by Banksia tree species on a shallow, sandy coastal aquifer. Oecologia, 131, 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhou, H. Z., Yu, X. D., Luo, T. H., & He, J. J. (2000). How does species diversity change? Spatio-temporal patterns and scales. Chinese Biodiversity, 8(3), 325–326 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  43. Zhuang, L., & Chen, Y. N. (2006). Physiological responses of three contrasting plant species to groundwater level changes in an arid environment. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 48, 520–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of SciencesUrmuqiChina
  2. 2.The Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology and Desert EnvironmentsXinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of SciencesUrumqiChina

Personalised recommendations