Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 151, Issue 1–4, pp 77–91 | Cite as

Geographical location and key sensitivity issues of post-industrial regions in Europe

  • Tomasz Stuczynski
  • Grzegorz Siebielec
  • Renata Korzeniowska-Puculek
  • Piotr Koza
  • Rafal Pudelko
  • Artur Lopatka
  • Monika Kowalik
Article

Abstract

Primary objectives of our work were to spatially delineate post industrial areas of the EU-27 and indicate key environmental, social and economic sensitivity issues for these regions. The density of industrial sites within NUTS-x regions for EU-27 countries was assessed by using CORINE 2000 land cover layer. A development of postindustrial society in Europe represents a strong geographic diversity. There are distinct historical and current differences between regions which form major groups, comprising similar internal characteristics and definable trends in environmental and socioeconomic sense. Regions grouped into postindustrial clusters are fundamentally different from the European average, and are facing specific problems related to global market and political changes. Eastern postindustrial regions can be characterized as socially and economically weak, exhibiting high unemployment rate, low GDP, negative population growth and a strong environmental pressure, represented by a high density of dump sites. Most of the western EU postindustrial areas have been successfully recovered and moved into new economy as shown by most of the indicators. In urban postindustrial zones, however, emission sources of pollutants seem to continually be a major problem—not necessarily in terms of exceeding thresholds, but through a remarkable difference in the amount of pollutants produced relative to other regions.

Keywords

Cluster Dump site Economic variables Emissions Environmental variables Post-industrial regions Sensitivity Social variables Unemployment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberini, A., Longo, A., Tonin, S., Trombetta, F., & Turvani, M. (2005). The role of liability, regulation and economic incentives in brownfield remediation and redevelopment: Evidence from surveys of developers. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 327–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antrop, M. (2004). Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape Urban Planning, 67, 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brand, R., Pulles, T., van Gijlswijk, R., Fribourg-Blanc, B., & Courbet, C. (2004). European Pollutant Emission Register (EPER) review report. (European Commission).Google Scholar
  4. Carmichael, F., & Ward, R. (2001). Male unemployment and crime in England and Wales. Economics Letters, 73, 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dauber, J., Hirsh, M., Simmering, D., Waldhart, R., Otte, A., & Wolters, V. (2003). Landscape structure as an indicator of biodiversity: Matrix effects on species richness. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 98, 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ERDAS (1999). Erdas Imagine 8.4 tour guides. Atlanta, Georgia: Erdas Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Ernoult, A., Tremauville, Y., Cellier, D., Margerie, P., Langlois, E., & Alard, D. (2006). Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: Past and present patterns? Biological conservation, 127, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European Commission (2000). From land cover to landscape diversity in the European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/comm/agriculture/publi/landscape/index.htm.
  9. European Commission (2002). Commission Communication COM (2002) 276 final of 05.06.2002: Communication from the commission on Impact Assessment.(EC).Google Scholar
  10. European Commission (2004). Working Group on contamination. Vol. I. Executive summary, strategic overview and status of soil contamination. Final report, May 2004, (EC-DG Environment).Google Scholar
  11. European Commission DG JRC (2005). IMAGE 2000 and CLC 2000 Products and methods. Nunes de Lima M.V. (Ed.) (European Commission).Google Scholar
  12. Ferber U., & Grimski D. (2002). Brownfields and redevelopment of urban areas. CLARINET report. (Austrian Federal Environment Agency).Google Scholar
  13. Ferguson, C., Darmendrail, D., Freier, K., Jensen, B.K., Jensen, J. Kasamas, H., et al. (Eds.) (1998). Risk Assessment or Contaminated Sites in Europe. Volume 1. Scientific Basis. CARACAS report. (LQM Press, Nottingham).Google Scholar
  14. Grimski, D., & Ferber, U. (2001). Urban brownfields in Europe. Land Contamination & Reclamation, 9, 143–148.Google Scholar
  15. Hahs, A. K., & McDonnell, M. J. (2006). Selecting independent measures to quantify Melbourne’s urban–rural gradient. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herzog, F., Lausch, A., Muller, E., Thulke, H. H., Steinhardt, U., & Lehman, S. (2001). Landscape metrics for assessment of landscape destruction and rehabilitation. Environmental Management, 27, 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Honnay, O., Piessens, K., Van Landuyt, W., Hermy, M., & Gulinck, H. (2003). Satellite based land use and landscape complexity indices as predictors for regional plant species diversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63, 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huttl, R. (1998). Ecology of post strip-mining landscapes in Lusatia, Germany. Environmental Science and Policy, 1, 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Islam, S. M., & Clarke, M. (2002). The relationship between economic development and social welfare: A new adjusted GDP measure of welfare. Social Indicator Research, 57, 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, A. R., Milne, B. T., Wiens, J. A., & Crist, T. O. (1992). Animal movements and population dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 7, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kasamas, H., Kiss, G., Moser, B., Schamann, M., Spausta, G., & Wepner, M. (2001). Proceedings of the CLARINET Final Conference Sustainable Management of Contaminated Land, 21–22 June 2001, Vienna, Austria. (Federal Environment Agency—Austria).Google Scholar
  22. Licsko, I., Lois, L., & Szebenyi, G. (1999). Tailings as a source of environmental pollution. Water Science and Technology, 39, 333–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGarigal, K., & Marks, B. (1994). Fragstats—Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Corvallis: Forest Science Department, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  24. Oliver, L., Ferber, U., Grimski, D., Millar, K., & Nathanail, P. (2005). The scale and nature of European brownfields. Cabernet (Concerted Action on Brownfield and Economic Regeneration Network) resources www.cabernet.org.uk. (in press).
  25. Simons, R. A. (1998). Turning brownfields into greenbacks. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.Google Scholar
  26. StatSoft (2005). Statistica data miner. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft.Google Scholar
  27. Stuczynski, T., Siebielec, G., Daniels, W., McCarty, G., & Chaney, R. L. (2007). Biological aspects of metal waste reclamation with biosolids. Journal of Environmental Quality, 36, 1154–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thornton, G., Franz, M., Edwards, D., Pahlen, G., & Nathanail, P. (2007). The challenge of sustainability: Incentives for brownfield regeneration in Europe. Environmental Science and Policy, 10, 116–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tonn, B. (2007). The intergovernmental panel on climate change: A global scale transformative initiative. Futures, 39, 614–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. UNSNA (1993). The System of National Accounts 1993.Google Scholar
  31. Wcislo, E., Ioven, D., Kucharski, R., & Szdzuj, J. (2002). Human health risk assessment case study: An abandoned metal smelter site in Poland. Chemosphere, 47, 507–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomasz Stuczynski
    • 1
  • Grzegorz Siebielec
    • 1
  • Renata Korzeniowska-Puculek
    • 1
  • Piotr Koza
    • 1
  • Rafal Pudelko
    • 1
  • Artur Lopatka
    • 1
  • Monika Kowalik
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation—State Research InstitutePulawyPoland

Personalised recommendations