Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 143, Issue 1–3, pp 91–102 | Cite as

Economics of place-based monitoring under the safe drinking water act, part II: Design and development of place-based monitoring strategies



The goals of environmental legislation and associated regulations are to protect public health, natural resources, and ecosystems. In this context, monitoring programs should provide timely and relevant information so that the regulatory community can implement legislation in a cost-effective and efficient manner. The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) of 1974 attempts to ensure that public water systems (PWSs) supply safe water to its consumers. As is the case with many other federal environmental statutes, SDWA monitoring has been implemented in relatively uniform fashion across the United States. In this three part series, spatial and temporal patterns in water quality data are utilized to develop, compare, and evaluate the economic performance of alternative place-based monitoring approaches to current monitoring practice. Part II: Several factors affect the performance of monitoring strategies, including: measurable objectives, required precision in estimates, acceptable confidence levels of such estimates, available budget for sampling. In this paper, we develop place-based monitoring strategies based on extensive analysis of available historical water quality data (1960–1994) of 19 Iowa community water systems. These systems supply potable water to over 350,000 people. In the context of drinking water, the objective is to protect public health by utilizing monitoring resources to characterize contaminants that are detectable, and are close to exceeding health standards. A place-based monitoring strategy was developed in which contaminants were selected based on their historical occurrence, rather than their appearance on the SDWA contaminant list. In a subset of the water systems, the temporal frequency of monitoring for one ubiquitous contaminant, nitrate, was tailored to patterns in its historical occurrence and concentration. Three sampling allocation models (linear, quadratic, and cubic) based on historic patterns in peak occurrence were developed and evaluated. Random and fixed-interval sampling strategies within the context of such models were also developed and evaluated. Strategies were configured to incorporate a variety of options for frequency and number of samples (depending on budget and the desired precision in estimate of peak concentrations).


Place–based monitoring Water quality Safe drinking water act Monitoring strategy development Performance measures Iowa USA Community water systems Screening Spatial variability Temporal variability 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Clark, G. M., Goolsby, D. A. Battaglin, W. A. (1999). Seasonal and annual load of herbicides from the Mississippi River Basin to the Gulf of Mexico. Environmental Science and Technology, 33(7), 981–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gilbert, R. O. (1987). Statistical methods for environmental pollution monitoring. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  3. Helsel, D. R., Hirsch, R. M. (2002). Statistical methods in water resources. Techniques of water-resources investigations of the United States Geological Survey, Book 4, Hydrologic analysis and interpretation. Retrieved from http://www.water.usgs.gov/pubs/twri/twri4a3/.
  4. Keith, L. H., Crummett, W., Deegan, J., Libby, R. A., Taylor, J. K., Wentler, G. (1983) Principles of environmental analysis. Analytical Chemistry, 55, 2210–2218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. National Research Council (NRC) (1977). Environmental Monitoring. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Porter, P. S., Ward, R. C., Bell, H. F. (1988). The detection limit. Environmental Science and Technology, 22, 856–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Richardson, S. D., Collette, T. W., Price, P. C., Genicola, F. A., Jenks, J. W., Thruston, A. D., et al. (1999). Identification of drinking water contaminants in the course of a childhood cancer investigation in Toms River, New Jersey. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 9, 200–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Skopec, M. P. (1999). Modeling the hydrologic system: scale, pattern and process. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Geography, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.Google Scholar
  9. US EPA (1996). Nonpoint source monitoring and evaluation guide, Final draft, US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water.Google Scholar
  10. US EPA (1999). A review of contaminant occurrence in public water systems, EPA Office of Water, EPA 816-R-99-006. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/safewater/occur/nov99_ lo.pdf.
  11. Vos, P., Meelis, E., Ter Keurs, W. J. (2000). A Framework for the design of ecological monitoring programs as a tool for environmental and nature management. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 61(3), 317–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyThe University of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations