Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 135, Issue 1–3, pp 369–382 | Cite as

Exploratory study of suspended sediment concentrations downstream of harvested peat bogs

  • Bronwyn Pavey
  • André Saint-Hilaire
  • Simon Courtenay
  • Taha Ouarda
  • Bernard Bobée


Peat bog harvesting is an important industry in many countries, including Canada. To harvest peat, bogs are drained and drainage water is evacuated towards neighboring rivers, estuaries or coastal waters. High suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) were found in the drainage water at one particular site during the 2001–2002 spring seasons in New Brunswick (Canada). The main objective of this study was to verify this observation at other sites, compare SSC levels leaving harvested peat bogs with those leaving an unharvested bog, and to determine if high SSC events happen only in Spring or all year round. Suspended sediment concentrations were monitored downstream of three harvested peat bogs and an unharvested reference bog located in New Brunswick during the ice free seasons of 2003–2004. On average, SSC at the harvested sites exceeded 25 mg/l, which is the recommended daily maximum concentration, 72% of the time, while the same concentration was exceeded 30% of the time at the unharvested sites. SSC were found to be significantly higher at harvested sites than at the reference sites for all seasons. The highest SSC medians were recorded in the Fall but SSC was elevated in all seasons. High SSC levels in receiving waters may be caused by field ditching activities and insufficient sediment controls. Findings suggest the NB Peat Harvesting 25 mg/l SSC guideline should be reviewed.


Drainage Harvesting Peat bogs Sedimentation ponds Suspended sediment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bragg, O. M., & Tallis, J. H. (2001). The sensitivity of peat-covered upland landscapes. Catena, 42, 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brylinsky, M. (1995). Evaluation of the impact of peat moss deposits at Mill Creek, New Brunswick. In Publication of the Acadia Center for Estuarine Research. Wolfville, NS, Canada: Acadia University (12 pp.).Google Scholar
  3. Clausen, J. C. (1981 May). The quality of runoff from natural and disturbed Minnesota peatlands. Paper presented at the Sixth International Peat Congress, Duluth.Google Scholar
  4. Clausen, J. C., & Brooks, K. N. (1983). Quality of runoff from Minnesota peatlands: I. A characterization. Water Resources Bulletin, 19(5), 763–772.Google Scholar
  5. Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Annali di Statistica, 7, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. GEMTEC Limited. (1993). Design, installation and monitoring of siltation ponds, Peat Bog 567, Lamèque Island, New Brunswick (pp 93–94). Fredericton, NB: New Brunswick Ministry of Natural Resources and Energy (Open File) 87 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Gregory, J. D., Skaggs, R. W., Broadhead, R. G., Culbreath, R. H., Bailey, J. R., & Foutz, T. L. (1984). Hydrologic and water quality impacts of peat mining in North Carolina. Report No. 214. Retrieved May 08, 2001, from
  8. Heikkinen, K. (1990). Transport of organic and inorganic matter in river, brook and peat mining water in the drainage basin of the River Kiiminkijoki. Aqua Fennica, 20(2), 143–155.Google Scholar
  9. Holden, J., & Burt, T. P. (2002). Infiltration, runoff and sediment production in blanket peat catchments: Implications of field rainFall simulation experiments. Hydrological Processes, 16, 2537–2557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ihme, R., Keikkinenand, K., & Lasko, E. (1991). The use of overland flow for the purification of runoff water from peat mining areas. National Boards of Waters and Environment Report No. 9, 48 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Joensuu, S. (2002). Effects of ditch network maintenance and sedimentation ponds on export loads of suspended solids and nutrients from peatland forests. Doctoral thesis, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 868.Google Scholar
  12. Joensuu, S., Ahti, E., & Vuollekoski, M. (1999). The effects of peatland forest ditch maintenance on suspended solids in runoff. Boreal Environment Research, 4, 343–355.Google Scholar
  13. Johansson, J. A., & Olofsson, H. (1985, September). Drainage water quality of peat mining areas. Paper present at the Peat and The Environment ‘85. International Peat Society Symposium, Jonkoping, Sweden.Google Scholar
  14. Kløve, B. (2000). Effect of peat harvesting on peat hydraulic properties and runoff generation. Suo, 51(3), 121–129.Google Scholar
  15. Kløve, B., & Bengtsson, L. (1999). Runoff generation in a plough-drained cutover fen in Central Finland. Journal of Hydrology, 218, 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolesin, V. N., & Yanushevskiy, V. V. (1985, September). Peat deposits drainage and environment. Paper present at the Peat and The Environment ‘85. International Peat Society Symposium, Jonkoping, Sweden.Google Scholar
  17. Lewis, J. (1996). Turbidity-controlled suspended sediment sampling for runoff-event load estimation. Water Resources Research, 32(7), 2299–2310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MGI Limited. (1994). Assessment of remediation feasibility, unnamed tributary to Mill Creek, Rexton, NB. Prepared for Malpec Peat Moss Ltd, Rexton, NB, Canada. MGI Limited, Fredericton, NB, September 1994, 10 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Olsson, T. (1985, September). Effects of mire drainage and peat extraction on benthic invertebrates and fish. Paper presented at the International Peat Society Symposium, Jonkiping, Sweden.Google Scholar
  20. Ouellette, C., Courtenay, S. C., St-Hilaire, A., & Boghen, A. D. (2006). Impact of peat moss released by a commercial harvesting operation into an estuarine environment on sand shrimp Crangon septemspinosa. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 22(1), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Paivanen, J. (1973). Hydraulic conductivity and water retention in peat soils. Report from the Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki, Finland. Acta Forestalia Fennica, 129, 1–70.Google Scholar
  22. Panu, U. S. (1989). Hydrological assessment of peat mining operations in domed bogs: A case study. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 14(3), 54–65.Google Scholar
  23. Phillips, D. (1990). The climates of Canada. Downsview, ON: Canadian Government Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Schlotzhauer, S. M., & Price, J. (1999). Soil-water flow dynamics in a managed cutover peat field, Quebec: Field and laboratory investigations. Water Resources Research, 35(12), 3675–3683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schuler, T. S. (2000). Impact of suspended and deposited sediment. The Practice of Watershed Protection: Article, 14, 64–65.Google Scholar
  26. Selin, P., & Koskinen, K. (1988). The sedimentation ponds as the water treatment system in the peat production areas and their effect on the water quality and plankton communities. Verb. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 23, 1564–1571.Google Scholar
  27. St-Hilaire, A., Courtenay, S. C., Diaz-Delgado, C., Pavey, B., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., Boghen, A., et al. (2006). Suspended sediment concentrations downstream of a harvested peat bog: analysis and preliminary modeling of exceedances using the logistic regression. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 30(3), 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thibault, J. (2001). Guidelines for peat mining operations in New Brunswick. Open File 98-7. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources and Energy. Minerals and Energy Division, Bathurst, NB, 15 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Thibault, J. (2006). Peat industry review 2005. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources and Energy, Minerals and Energy Division, Bathurst, NB, 4 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Wetzel, R. G. (1975). Limnology. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  31. Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bronwyn Pavey
    • 1
  • André Saint-Hilaire
    • 1
  • Simon Courtenay
    • 2
  • Taha Ouarda
    • 1
  • Bernard Bobée
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair in Statistical Hydrology, INRS-ETEQuebec CityCanada
  2. 2.Fisheries and Oceans Canada at the Canadian Rivers Institute, Department of BiologyUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations