A New Method for Determination of Chlorophylls in Freshwater Algae
A new method (NMM, using acetic acid fiber filter and 90% ethanol) was established to determine chlorophyll in freshwater algae, and it was compared with US standard method (USM, using glass fiber filter and 90% acetone) and the method recommend by EPA of China (CHM, using acetic acid fiber filter and 90% acetone). The precision and repeatability of NMM is equivalent to that of USM, but NMM is safer to laboratory workers than USM and CHM because ethanol was used as solvent in NMM instead of acetone used in USM and CHM, and time and money were also greatly saved by the new method. The precision and repeatability of CHM was much less than USM and NMM, and the advice improving the method was proposed that the extraction time must be prolonged.
KeywordsChlorophylls Spectrophotometry Glass fiber filter Acetic acid fiber filter Acetone Ethanol
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Elizabeth, J. A. (1997a). Method 446.0, in vitro determination of chlorophylls a, b, c1+c2 and pheopigments in marine and freshwater algae by visible spectrophotometry. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (pp. 1–26).Google Scholar
- Elizabeth, J. A. (1997b). Method 447.0, determination of chlorophylls a and b and identification of other pigments of interest in marine and freshwater algae using high performance liquid chromatography with visible wavelength detection. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (pp. 1–20).Google Scholar
- Elizabeth, J. A., & Gary, B. C. (1997). Method 445.0, in vitro determination of chlorophyll a and pheophytin a in marine and freshwater algae by fluorescence. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (pp. 1–22).Google Scholar
- Fusheng W. (2002). Standard methods for the Examination and Analysis of Water and Wastewater (4th ed., pp. 720–735). Beijing, China: China Environmental Science Press.Google Scholar
- Lenore, S. C., Amold, E. G., & Aadrew, D. E. (2001). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 20th. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation (pp. 235–255).Google Scholar