Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 130, Issue 1–3, pp 221–236 | Cite as

Water Quality Assessment of an Untreated Effluent Impacted Urban Stream: The Bharalu Tributary of the Brahmaputra River, India



Guwahati, the lone city on the bank of the entire midstream of the Brahmaputra River, is facing acute civic problem due to severe depletion of water quality of its natural water bodies. This work is an attempt towards water quality assessment of a relatively small tributary of the Brahmaputra called the Bharalu River flowing through the city that has been transformed today into a city drainage channel. By analyzing the key physical, chemical and biological parameters for samples drawn from different locations, an assessment of the dissolved load and pollution levels at different segments in the river was made. Locations where the contaminants exceeded the permissible limits during different seasons were identified by examining spatial and temporal variations. A GIS developed for the watershed with four layers of data was used for evaluating the influence of catchment land use characteristics. BOD, DO and total phosphorus were found to be the sensitive parameters that adversely affected the water quality of Bharalu. Relationship among different parameters revealed that the causes and sources of water quality degradation in the study area were due to catchments input, anthropogenic activities and poor waste management. Elevated levels of total phosphorus, BOD and depleted DO level in the downstream were used to develop an ANN model by taking total phosphorus and BOD as inputs and dissolved oxygen as output, which indicated that an ANN based predictive tool can be utilized for monitoring water quality in the future.


Bharalu Brahmaputra land use water quality ANN 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Society of Civil Engineers Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology (2000a). Artificial neural networks in hydrology, I preliminary concepts. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 5(2), 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Society of Civil Engineers Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology (2000b). Artificial neural networks in hydrology, II: Hydrologic applications. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 5(2), 124–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA (1992). Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater 18th Edition; Prepared and published jointly by: American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF), New York.Google Scholar
  4. Barica, J. (1974). Extreme fluctuations in water quality of eutrophic fish kill lakes: Effect of sediment mixing. Water Research, 8(11), 881–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellos, D., & Sawidis, T. (2005). Chemical pollution monitoring of the river Pinios (Thessalia – Greece). Journal of Environmental Management, 76, 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brainwood, M. A., Burgin, S., & Maheshwari, B. (2004). Temporal variations in water quality of farm dams: Impacts of land use and water sources. Agricultural Water Management, 70, 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capkin, E., Altinoc, I., & Karahan, S. (2006). Water quality and fish size affect toxicity of endosulfan, an organochlorine pesticide, to rainbow trout. Chemosphere, 64, 1793–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Vlaming, V., Di Giorgio, C., Fong, S., Deanovic, L. A, de la Paz Carpio-Obeso, M. D., Miller, J. L. et al. (2004). Irrigation runoff insecticide pollution of rivers in the Imperial Valley, California, USA. Environmental Pollution, 132, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donnelly, T. H., Barnes, C. J., Wasson, R. J., Murray, A. S., & Short, D. L. (1998). Catchment phosphorus sources and algal blooms – An interpretative review. Technical Report 18/98-CSIRO Land and Water Canberra, ACT 2601. Retrieved October 5, 2004 from http://www.clw.csiro.au/publication/technical98/tr18-98.pdf.
  10. Farley, R. H. (2004). Calcium and alkalinity. Reefkeeping – an online magazine for aquarist. Retrieved February 8, 2005 from http://www.reefkeeping.com/issues/2002–04.
  11. Goswami, D. C. (1985). Brahmaputra River, Assam, India: Physiography, basin denudation, and channel aggradation. Water Resources Research, 21(7), 959–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hairstone, J. E., & Stribling, L. (1995). Typical contaminants and problems. Agriculture and natural resources. Retrieved October 5, 2004 from http://www.aces.edu/pubs/docs/A/ANR-0790/WQ2.3.6.pdf.
  13. Holmer, M., & Storkholm, P. (2001). Sulphate reduction and sulphur cycling in lake sediments: A review. Freshwater Biology, 46, 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Izonfuo, L. W. A., & Bariweni, A. P. (2001). The effect of urban runoff water and human activities on some physico chemical parameters of the Epic Creek in the Niger Delta. Journal of Applied Science and Environmental Management, 5(1), 47–55. Google Scholar
  15. Maier, H. R., & Dandy, G. C. (2000). Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: A review of modeling issues and applications. Environmental Modeling and Software, 15(1), 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marnette, E. C., Hordijk, C., Breemen, N. V., & Coppenberg, T. E. (1992). Sulphate reduction in S-oxidation in Moorland Pool sediment. Biogeochemistry, 17, 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin, J. C., Hoggart, C., & Matissa, A. (1998). Improvement priorities for sewage treatment in Latvian small and medium sized towns. Water Science and Technology, 37(8), 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Neal, C., Harrow, M., & Williams, R. J. (1998). Dissolved carbon dioxide and oxygen in river Thames: Spring–summer 1997. The Science of the Total Environment, 210/211, 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ohlrogge (2004). UW extention community needs assessment survey. Retrieved November 5, 2005 from http://www.uwex.edu/ces/cty/iowa/cnred/documents/waterqualityflyer.pdf.
  20. Olajire, A. A., & Imeokparia, F. E. (2001). Water quality assessment of Osun River: Studies on inorganic nutrients. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 69, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parr, L. B., & Mason, C. F. (2003). Long-term trends in water quality and their impact on macroinvertebrate assemblages in eutrophic lowland rivers. Water Research, 37, 2969–2971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parr, L. B., & Mason, C. F. (2004). Causes of low oxygen in a lowland, regulated eutrophic river in Eastern England. Science of the Total Environment, 321, 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rounds, S. A. (2002). Development of a neural network model for dissolved oxygen in the Tualatin River, Oregon. In proceedings of the second federal inter agency hydrologic modeling conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, July 29– August 1.Subcommittee on hydrology of the interagency advisory committee on water information. Retrieved October 14, 2005; from http://smig.usgs.gov/SMIG/features_0902/tualatin_ann.html.
  24. Rutherford, J. C., Wilcock, R. J., & Hickey, C. W. (1991). Deoxygenation in a mobile bed river: I. Field studies. Water Research, 25(12), 1487–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharma, J. N. (2005). Fluvial Process and Morphology of the Brahmaputra River in Assam. Geomorphology, 70, 226–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Silva, A. M. M., & Sacomani, L. B. (2001). Using chemical and Physical Parameters to define the quality of Pardo River water. Water Research, 35(6), 1609–1616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Suen, J. P., & Eheart, J. W. (2003). Evaluation of neural networks for modeling nitrate concentrations in rivers. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, 129(6), 505–510.Google Scholar
  28. Tsiouris, S. E., Mamolos, A. P., Kalburtji, K. L., & Alifrangis, D. (2002). The quality of runoff water collected from a wheat field margin in Greece. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 89, 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. USEPA (2004). Edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA/822-R-04–005, Washington, District of Columbia: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2004.Google Scholar
  30. Wang, M., & Hjelmfelt, A. T. (1998). DEM based overland flow routing model. ASCE Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 3(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. World Health Organization (WHO) (1997). Guidelines for drinking water quality (vol. 1) recommendations. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. R. Girija
    • 1
  • Chandan Mahanta
    • 1
  • V. Chandramouli
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology GuwahatiGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.Oliver Raymond Hall-Civil Engineering DepartmentUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations