Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 108, Issue 1–3, pp 323–335 | Cite as

Landscape Change and Ecosystem Classification in a Municipal District of a Small City (Isernia, Central Italy)

  • Alicia Acosta
  • M. Laura Carranza
  • Michela Giancola


Landscape changes taking place from 1954 to 1992 in the muncipal district of Isernia city (Central Italy) were described in relation to a system of ecosystem classification. Isernia municipal district was selected for study because recent historic changes in this area represent a typical example of landscape transformation similar to many small cities of Italy and other Mediterranean countries. To assess overall changes, three land cover maps (scale 1:25,000) were derived from panchromatic aerial photographs and field surveys. These were then digitalised in a Geographic Information System. A Land Facet (LF) map was derived by combining a phytoclimatic, a lithostatigrafic and a topographic map, and then digitalised as data layers in the same GIS. Results demonstrated two main landscape transformation trends: forest and semi-natural areas increased (8%), whereas agricultural areas decreased (12%). The urban area was relatively small during the entire analysed period, growing from 1% in 1954, to just 5% in 1992. Forest coverage was significant on reliefs, on hillside ecosystems such as limestone and on clay and marl hills LF. Arable land was particularly significant in flat ecosystems with deeper soils, such as on recent alluvial plain LF. These temporal changes were interpreted as being related to the replacement of traditional farming methods (grazing pastures) with more intensive methods (crop fields), especially on alluvial plains.


CORINE land cover GIS hierarchical landscape classification landscape composition vegetation dynamics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anon: 1993: CORINE Land Cover. Guide technique, CECA-CEE-CEEA, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  2. Accordi, G., Carbone, F., Civitelli, G., Corda, L., De Rita, D., Esu, D., Funiciello, R., Kotsakis, T., Mariotti, G. and Sposato, A.: 1988, Carta delle litofacies del Lazio-Abruzzo ed aree limitrofi, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Quaderni della Ricerca Scientifica. Roma.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, R. G.: 1996, Ecosystem Geography, Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Blasi, C., Acosta, A., Paura, B., Di Martino, P., Giordani, D., Di Marzio, P., Fortini, P. and Carranza, M. L.: 2000a, ‘Classificazione e cartografia del paesaggio: i sistemi e i sottosistemi di paesaggio del Molise,’ Informatore Botanico Italiano 31, 15–25.Google Scholar
  5. Blasi, C., Carranza, M. L., Frondoni, R. and Rosati, L.: 2000b, ‘Ecosystem classification and mapping: A proposal for Italian landscapes,’ Appl. Veg. Sci. 3, 233–242.Google Scholar
  6. Blasi, C. and Iovino, F.: 2003, Bioclima d’Italia, In: C. Blasi (ed.) Conoscenze naturalistiche in Italia/Ecological Information in Italy, Società Botanica Italiana –Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio, Roma, pp.: 11–12.Google Scholar
  7. Blasi, C., Smiraglia, D. and Carranza, M. L.: 2003, ‘Analisi multitemporale del paesaggio all’interno di un sistema di classificazione gerarchica del territorio. Il caso dei Monti Lepini (Italia Centrale),’ Informatore Botanico Italiano 35(1), 31–41.Google Scholar
  8. Bowman, D. M., Walsh, A. and Milne, D. J.: 2001, ‘Forest expansion and grassland contraction within a Eucalyptus savanna matrix between 1941 and 1992 at Litchfield National Park in the Australian monsoon tropics,’ Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 10, 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bredenkamp, G., Chytrý, M., Fischer, H. S., Neuhäuslova, Z. and van der Maarel, E.: 1998, ‘Vegetation mapping: Theory, methods and case studies,’ Intro. Appl. Veg. Sci. 1, 162–164.Google Scholar
  10. Carranza, M. L., Ricotta, C., Fortini, P. and Blasi, C.: 2003, ‘Quantifying landscape change with actual vs. potential natural vegetation maps,’ Phytocoenologia 33(4), 591–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carranza, M. L., Acosta, A. and Giancola, M.: 2003, ‘Analisi dei cambiamenti della copertura del suolo.’ Estimo e Territorio 66(6), 12–16.Google Scholar
  12. Christensen, N. L., Bartuska, A. M., Brown, J. H., Carpenter, S., D’Antonio, C., Francis, R., Franklin, J. F., Mac Mahon, J. A., Noss, R. F., Parsons, D. J., Peterson, C. H., Turner, M. G. and Woodmansee, R. G.: 1996, ‘The report of the Ecological Society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management,’ Ecol. Appl. 6, 665–691.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, L., Bojie Fu, J. and Qui, Y.: 2001, ‘Land-use change in a small catchment of northern Loess Plateu, China,’ Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 86, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Di Pietro, R. and Fillibeck, G.: 2000, ‘Terrazzamenti abbandonati e recupero della vegetazione spontanea: Il caso dei Monti Aurunci,’ Inf. Bot. Ital. 32(1–3), 17–30.Google Scholar
  15. Forman, R. T. T.: 1995, Land Mosaic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Forman, R. T. T. and Godron, M.: 1986, Landscape Ecology, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Franklin, J. F.: 1993, ‘Preserving biodiversity: Species, ecosystems or landscapes?’ Ecol. Appl. 3, 202–205.Google Scholar
  18. Gosz, J. R. and Sharpe, P. J. H.: 1989, ‘Broad-scale concepts for interactions of climate, topography, and biota at biome transitions,’ Landscape Ecol. 3, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hietala-Koivu, R.: 2002, ‘Landscape and modernizing agriculture: A case study of three areas in Finland in 1954–1998,’ Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 91, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Irwin, E. G. and Geoghegan, J.: 2001, ‘Theory, data, methods: Developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change,’ Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 85, 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kienast, F.: 1993, ‘Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a Geographical Information System: A methodological outline,’ Landscape Ecol. 8, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klijn, F. and Udo de Haes, H.A.: 1994, ‘A hierarchical approach to ecosystems and its implications for ecological land classification,’ Landscape Ecol. 9, 89–104.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, R. G., Flamm, R. O., Turner, M. G., Bledsoe, C., Chandler, P., De Ferrari, C., Gottfried, R., Naiman, R.J., Schumaker, N. and Wear, D.: 1992, ‘Integrating Sustainable Development and Environmental Vitality,’ in: R.J. Naiman (Ed.) Watershed Management: Balancing Sustainability and Environmental Change, Springer-Verlag. New York, pp. 499–521.Google Scholar
  24. Matson, B. E. and Power, R. G.: 1996, ‘Developing an ecological land classification for the Fundy Model Forest,’ south-eastern New Brunswick, Canada, Environ. Monitor. Assess. 39, 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Neill, R. V., Gardner, R. H. and Turner, M. G.: 1992, ‘A hierarchical neutral model for landscape analysis,’ Landscape Ecol. 7, 55–61.Google Scholar
  26. Pan, D., Domon, G., de Bois, S. and Bouchard, A.: 1999, ‘Temporal (1958–1993) and spatial patterns of lands use changes in Haut-Saint-Laurent (Quebec, Canada) and their relation to landscape physical attributes,’ Landscape Ecol. 14, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paura, B. and Lucchese, F.: 1996, ‘Lineamenti fitoclimatici del Molise,’ Giorn. Bot. Ital. 130, 521.Google Scholar
  28. Vos, W. and Stortelder, A.: 1992, Vanishing Tuscan Landscapes. Landscape Ecology of a Submediterranean-Montane Area (Solano Basin, Tuscany, Italy), Pudoc Scientific Publishers Wageningen.Google Scholar
  29. Wear, D. and Bolstad, P.: 1998, ‘Land-use changes in southern Appalachian Landscapes: Spatial analysis and forecast evaluation,’ Ecosystems 1, 575–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zonneveld, I. S.: 1995, Land Ecology: An Introduction to Landscape Ecology as a Base for Land Evaluation, Land Management and Conservation, S P B Academic Publishing, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alicia Acosta
    • 1
  • M. Laura Carranza
    • 2
  • Michela Giancola
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di BiologiaUniversità di Roma TreRomaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie per l’AmbienteUniversità degli Studi del MoliseIśerniaItaly

Personalised recommendations