Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 108, Issue 1–3, pp 261–277 | Cite as

Genetic Algorithm Usage in Water Quality Monitoring Networks Optimization in Gediz (Turkey) River Basin

  • Yilmaz Icaga


Selection procedure of the optimum station combination for decreasing the station number from 33 to 14 in water quality monitoring network of Gediz river basin was applied using an optimization method. Gediz basin is one of the important basins and it covers 2.3% of the total surface area of Turkey. The technique includes two stages as the data preparation and the optimization. In the data preparation stage, firstly, alternative station combinations decreased and then station combination scores obtained from assigned selection criteria for point and nonpoint pollution management objectives. Finally, genetic algorithm applied to select the best combination. The results were compared with a prior solution that used dynamic programming as the optimization technique.


genetic algorithm network design optimization sampling sites water quality monitoring 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Gibbons, J. D. and Chakraborti, S.: 1992, Nonparametric Statistical Inference, 3rd edn, Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Goldberg, D. E.: 1989, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison Wesley Longman, U.S.A., p. 412.Google Scholar
  3. Halhal, D., Walters, G. A., Ouazar, D. and Savic, D. A.: 1997, ‘Water network rehabilitation with structured messy genetic algorithm’, J. Water Resource Plan. Manag. (May –June), pp. 137–146.Google Scholar
  4. Icaga, Y.: 1998, ‘Spatial Optimization of Hydrometric Data Networks by System Analysis Techniques’, PhD Thesis, 9 Eylul University, Izmir, p. 228.Google Scholar
  5. Karpouzos, D. K., Delay, F. Katsifarakis, K. L. and de Marsily, G.: 2001, ‘A multipopulation genetic algorithm to solve the inverse problem in hydrogeology’, Water Resource Res. 37(9), 2291–2302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lettenmaier, D. P., Anderson, D. E. and Brenner, R. N.: 1984, ‘Consolidation of a stream quality monitoring network’, Water Resource Bull. 20(4), 473–481.Google Scholar
  7. McMahon, T. A. and Mein, R. G.: 1986, River and Reservoir Yield, Monash University, Australia, p. 368.Google Scholar
  8. Mitchell, M.: 1998, An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Massachusetts, p. 209.Google Scholar
  9. Mulligan, A. E. and Brown, L. C.: 1998, ‘Genetic algorithms for calibrating water quality models’, J. Environ. Engin. (March) 202–211.Google Scholar
  10. Osyczka, A.: 2002, Evolutionary Algorithms for Single and Multicriteria Design Optimization, Physica-Verlag Heidelberg, New York, p. 218.Google Scholar
  11. Sharp, W. E.: 1970, ‘Stream order as a measure of sample uncertainty’, Water Resource Res. 6(3), 919–926.Google Scholar
  12. Sharp, W. E.: 1971, ‘A topologically optimum water –sampling plan for rivers and streams’, Water Resource Res. 7(6), 1641–1646.Google Scholar
  13. Vasquez, J. A., Maier, H. R., Lence, B. J., Tolson, B. A. and Foschi, R. O.: 2000, ‘Achieving water quality system reliability using genetic algorithms’, J. Environ. Engin. (October), 954–962.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical Education FacultyAfyon Kocatepe UniversityAfyonTurkey

Personalised recommendations