The Unexpected Kinematics of Simple Extension and Contraction of Incompressible Materials


Simple extension and contraction of incompressible non-linearly elastic materials is considered here, with cuboid specimens stretched or contracted in one of the principal directions. Although the average stretch of infinitesimal line elements in such deformations is always extensile, the local response is much more nuanced. We examine the variation of the squared stretch with applied stretch and line element orientation in the undeformed configuration. The response of interest here is the percentage of directions at a point for which the material is in compression which we call the amount of material in compression. It is shown that the maximum amount of compression attainable is approximately \(61\%\) which occurs for infinitesimal contractions. Further contraction results in a decrease in the amount of material in compression, with the material being extensile almost everywhere in the limit of zero axial stretch. On the other hand, for simple extension, the amount of material in compression is a monotonically decreasing function of axial stretch, with \(39\%\) in compression for infinitesimal strains. The amount of material in compression therefore exhibits a discontinuity in the reference configuration. The amount of material in compression is still significant for moderate extensions, with, for example, \(25\%\) of the material still in compression for \(100\%\) stretch. Suspecting that this somewhat surprising response is a result of assuming perfect incompressibility, the effect of compressibility on the amount of material in compression is examined within the context of the linear theory for isotropic elastic materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4


  1. 1.

    Truesdell, C., Noll, W.: The Non-linear Field Theories of Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Atkin, R.J., Fox, N.: An Introduction to the Theory of Elasticity. Longman, London (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ogden, R.W.: Non-linear Elastic Deformations. Dover, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Treloar, L.R.G.: The Physics of Rubber Elasticity. Oxford University Press, London (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Horgan, C.O., Murphy, J.G.: Magic angles for fibrous incompressible elastic materials. Proc. R. Soc. A 474, 20170728 (2018)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Murphy, J.G.: Transversely isotropic biological soft tissue must be modeled using both anisotropic invariants. Eur. J. Mech. A, Solids 42, 90–96 (2013)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Horgan, C.O., Murphy, J.G.: The counterintuitive out-of-plane strength of incompressible orthotropic hyperelastic materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 115, 170–179 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    De Rosa, E., Latorre, M., Montans, F.J.: Capturing anisotropic constitutive models with WYPiWYG hyperelasticity; and on consistency with the infinitesimal theory at all deformation levels. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 96, 75–92 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Horgan, C.O., Murphy, J.G.: Magic angles and fibre stretch in arterial tissue: insights from the linear theory. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 88, 470–477 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Goriely, A., Tabor, M.: Rotation, inversion and perversion in anisotropic elastic cylindrical tubes and membranes. Proc. R. Soc. A 469, 20130011 (2013)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Demirkoparan, H., Pence, T.J.: Magic angles for fiber reinforcement in rubber-elastic tubes subject to pressure and swelling. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 68, 87–95 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Goriely, A.: The Mathematics and Mechanics of Biological Growth. Springer, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Horgan, C.O., Murphy, J.G.: Magic angles in the mechanics of fibrous soft materials. Mech. Soft Mater. 1, 1–6 (2019)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. G. Murphy.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horgan, C.O., Murphy, J.G. The Unexpected Kinematics of Simple Extension and Contraction of Incompressible Materials. J Elast 138, 195–203 (2020).

Download citation


  • Incompressible elastic materials
  • Isochoric simple extension and contraction

Mathematics Subject Classification

  • 74B20
  • 74G55