Journal of Elasticity

, Volume 84, Issue 2, pp 99–129

# Local and Global Injective Solution of the Rotationally Symmetric Sphere Problem

Article

## Abstract

There are problems in the classical linear theory of elasticity whose closed form solutions, while satisfying the governing equations of equilibrium together with well-posed boundary conditions, predict the existence of regions, often quite small, inside the body where material overlaps. Of course, material overlapping is not physically realistic, and one possible way to prevent it combines linear theory with the requirement that the deformation field be injective. A formulation of minimization problems in classical linear elasticity proposed by Fosdick and Royer [3] imposes this requirement through a Lagrange multiplier technique. An existence theorem for minimizers of plane problems is also presented. In general, however, it is not certain that such minimizers exist. Here, the Euler–Lagrange equations corresponding to a family of three-dimensional problems is investigated. In classical linear elasticity, these problems do not have bounded solutions inside a body of anisotropic material for a range of material parameters. For another range of parameters, bounded solutions do exist but yield stresses that are infinite at a point inside the body. In addition, these solutions are not injective in a region surrounding this point, yielding unrealistic behavior such as overlapping of material. Applying the formulation of Fosdick and Royer on this family of problems, it is shown that both the displacements and the constitutive part of the stresses are bounded for all values of the material parameters and that the injectivity constraint is preserved. In addition, a penalty functional formulation of the constrained elastic problems is proposed, which allows to devise a numerical approach to compute the solutions of these problems. The approach consists of finding the displacement field that minimizes an augmented potential energy functional. This augmented functional is composed of the potential energy of linear elasticity theory and of a penalty functional divided by a penalty parameter. A sequence of solutions is then constructed, parameterized by the penalty parameter, that converges to a function that satisfies the first variation conditions for a minimizer of the constrained minimization problem when this parameter tends to infinity. This approach has the advantages of being mathematically appealling and computationally simple to implement.

## Mathematics Subject Classifications (2000)

74B05 74E10 74G65 74G70 74S05

## Key words

anisotropy elasticity energy minimization Finite Element Method singularity

## References

1. 1.
Aguiar, A.R., Fosdick, R.L.: A singular problem in incompressible nonlinear elastostatics. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 10, 1181–1207 (2000)
2. 2.
Aguiar, A.R., Fosdick, R.L.: Self-intersection in elasticity. Int. J. Solids Struct. 38, 4797–4823 (2001)
3. 3.
Fosdick, R.L., Royer-Carfagni, G.: The constraint of local injectivity in linear elasticity theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A 457, 2167–2187 (2001)
4. 4.
Fosdick, R.L., Royer-Carfagni, G.: A penalty interpretation for the lagrange multiplier fields in incompressible multipolar elasticity theory. Math. Mech. Solids 10, 389–413 (2005)
5. 5.
Golub, G.H., van Loan, C.F.: Matrix Computations. 3rd ed., John Hopkins University, Baltimore (1996)
6. 6.
John, F.: Plane strain problems for a perfectly elastic material of harmonic type. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. XIII, 239–296 (1960)
7. 7.
Kim, S.J., Kim, J.H.: Finite element analysis of laminated composites with contact constraint by extended interior penalty methods. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 36, 3421–3439 (1993)
8. 8.
Knowles, J.K., Sternberg, E.: On the singularity induced by certain mixed boundary conditions in linearized and nonlinear elastostatics. Int. J. Solids Struct. 11, 1173–1201 (1975)
9. 9.
Lekhnitskii, S.G.: Anisotropic Plates. Gordon and Breach Science, New York (1968)Google Scholar
10. 10.
11. 11.
Malkus, D.S., Hughes, T.J.R.: Mixed finite element methods – Reduced and selective integration technique: A unification of concepts. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 15, 63–81 (1978)
12. 12.
Obeidat, K., Stolarski, H., Fosdick, R., Royer-Carfagni, G.: Numerical analysis of elastic problems with injectivity constraints. In: European Conference on Computational Mechanics (ECCM-2001) (2001)Google Scholar
13. 13.
Oden, J.T., Kikuchi, N., Song, Y.J.: Reduced integration and exterior penalty methods for finite element approximations of contact problems in incompressible elasticity. TICOM Report – University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 80 (1980)Google Scholar
14. 14.
Oden, J.T., Kim, S.J.: Interior penalty methods for finite element approximations of the signorini problem in elastostatics. Comput. Math. Appl. 8, 35–56 (1982)
15. 15.
Simo, J.C., Taylor, R.L.: Penalty function formulations for incompressible nonlinear elastostatics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 35, 107–118 (1982)
16. 16.
Sokolnikoff, I.S.: Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York (1956)
17. 17.
Ting, T.C.T.: The remarkable nature of radially symmetric deformation of spherically uniform linear anisotropic elastic solids. J. Elast. 53, 47–64 (1999)
18. 18.
Zienkiewicz, O.C., Taylor, R.L., Too, J.B.: Reduced integration technique in general analysis of plates and shells. Int. J. Numer. Eng. 3, 275–290 (1971)