Advertisement

European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 141, Issue 2, pp 349–360 | Cite as

Measuring the general phytosanitary situation: development of a plant health barometer

  • Olivier Wilmart
  • Xavier Van Huffel
  • Herman Diricks
  • Vera Huyshauwer
  • David Michelante
  • Claude Bragard
  • Bruno Schiffers
  • Luc Pussemier
  • Dirk Berkvens
  • Monica Höfte
  • Mieke Uyttendaele
Article

Abstract

The development of a plant health barometer, an instrument to measure the general phytosanitary situation on a national level (Belgium) and on a yearly basis and to monitor its evolution over time, is described. The elaboration of a set of 13 plant health indicators (PHI’s) as the basis for the plant health barometer is discussed. These indicators were weighted by experts - including scientists, policy makers and agro-industrial representatives - to determine their relative impact in the barometer. The result of the barometer is expressed as a comparison with the previous year. Based on the results of the 13 PHI’s, it is concluded that the general plant health in Belgium shows a positive evolution from 2007 until 2010 and a negative evolution from 2010 until 2012. The plant health barometer provides a overview of the phytosanitary situation of plants and plant products in Belgium and is a tool to communicate in an intelligible, comprehensible manner on aspects of plant health to consumers and professional stakeholders in the plant production chain. Together with the food safety barometer and the animal health barometer, the plant health barometer is one of the three instruments to provide a overview on the general status of the safety of the food chain in Belgium.

Keywords

Barometer Plant health Phytosanitary situation Belgium 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the members of the working group ‘SciCom 2009/09 ter’ (cf. Scientific Committee 2011) for their collaboration and of the Scientific Committee of the FASFC for their supervision and validation of this study.

References

  1. Baert, K., Van Huffel, X., Wilmart, O., Jacxsens, L., Berkvens, D., Diricks, H., Huyghebaert, A., & Uyttendaele, M. (2011). Measuring the safety of the food chain in Belgium: development of a barometer. Food Research International, 44(4), 940–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baert, K., Van Huffel, X., Jacxsens, L., Berkvens, D., Diricks, H., Huyghebaert, A., & Uyttendaele, M. (2012). Measuring the perceived pressure and stakeholders’ response that may impact the status of the safety of the food chain in Belgium. Food Research International, 48(1), 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bezirtzoglou, C., Dekas, K., & Charvalos, E. (2011). Climate changes, environment and infection: facts, scenarios and growing awareness from the public health community within Europe. Anaerobe, 17(6), 337–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Depoorter, P., Van Huffel, X., Diricks, H., Imberechts, H., Dewulf, J., Berkvens, D., Uyttendaele, M. Measuring general animal health status: development of an animal health barometer. Submitted for publication in Preventive Veterinary Medecine.Google Scholar
  5. FCEC. (2010). Evaluation of the Community Plant Health Regime. Food Chain Evaluation Consortium (FCEC). European Commission, DG SANCO. Available at the following address: http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/plant_health_biosafety/rules/index_en.htm
  6. Gore, S. M. (1987). Biostatistics and the medical research council. MRC News, 35, 19–20.Google Scholar
  7. Houins, G. (2009). Business plan for the food agency 2009–2011, 88p. Available in French at the following address: http://www.afsca.be/publicationsthematiques/business-plan-AFSCA.asp
  8. Pautasso, M., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Holdenrieder, O., Pietravalle, S., Salama, N., Jeger, M. J., Lange, E., & Hehl-Lange, S. (2010). Plant health and global change–some implications for landscape management. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 85(4), 729–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Scientific Committee. (2010). Advice 28–2010 of the Scientific Committee of the FASFC on 10th September 2010. Development of a barometer of the safety of the food chain: methodology and case study: ‘food safety barometer’ (dossier Sci Com 2009/09). Available at the following address: http://www.afsca.be/scientificcommittee/advices/_documents/Advice28-2010-FoodSafetyBarometer_001.pdf.
  10. Scientific Committee. (2011). Advice 10–2011 of the Scientific Committee of the FASFC on 26th September 2011. The development of a plant health (phytosanitary situation) barometer (dossier Sci Com 2009/09ter). Available at the following address: http://www.afsca.be/scientificcommittee/advices/_documents/ADVICE10-2011_EN_DOSSIER2009-09ter.pdf.
  11. Scientific Committee. (2012). Advice 11–2012 of the Scientific Committee of the FASFC on 4th May 2012. The weight factors of the indicators used in the food safety, animal health and plant health (phytosanitary situation) barometers (dossier Sci Com 2012/03). Available at the following address: http://www.afsca.be/scientificcommittee/advices/_documents/Advice11-2012.pdf.
  12. StataCorp. (2011). Stata: Release 12. Statistical Software. College Station TX, Stata Corp LP.Google Scholar
  13. State Secretary for combating poverty, FPS Social Integration, FPS Social Security and FPS Economy. (2011). The inter-federal poverty barometer. Available in French at the following address: http://enquete.mi-is.be/armoedebarometer/pages_fr/startMenu.html
  14. Sustainable Development Task Force. (2009). Indicators, goals and visions of sustainable development’ – Federal Report on sustainable development. 232 p. Available in French at the following address: http://www.plan.be/admin/uploaded/200910261233400.rapport_2009_fr.pdf

Copyright information

© Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivier Wilmart
    • 1
  • Xavier Van Huffel
    • 1
  • Herman Diricks
    • 1
  • Vera Huyshauwer
    • 1
  • David Michelante
    • 1
  • Claude Bragard
    • 3
  • Bruno Schiffers
    • 4
  • Luc Pussemier
    • 5
  • Dirk Berkvens
    • 2
    • 6
  • Monica Höfte
    • 7
  • Mieke Uyttendaele
    • 2
    • 8
  1. 1.Directorate Control Policy, Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain (FASFC)BrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Scientific Committee, Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain (FASFC)BrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Earth & Life Institute, Applied Microbiology, Faculty of Biological, Agricultural and Environmental EngineeringCatholic University of Louvain (UCL)Louvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  4. 4.Laboratory of Phytopharmacy, Department of Chemistry and Bio-Industries, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech (GxABT)University of Liège (ULg)GemblouxBelgium
  5. 5.Operational Direction of Chemical Safety of the Food ChainVeterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre (CODA-CERVA)TervurenBelgium
  6. 6.Department of Biomedical SciencesInstitute of Tropical Medicine (ITG)AntwerpBelgium
  7. 7.Laboratory of Phytopathology, Department of Crop Protection, Faculty of Bioscience EngineeringGhent University (UGent)GhentBelgium
  8. 8.Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Food Preservation, Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Faculty of Bioscience EngineeringGhent University (UGent)GhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations