Advertisement

European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 136, Issue 3, pp 557–563 | Cite as

Erysiphe trifolii is able to overcome er1 and Er3, but not er2, resistance genes in pea

  • S. Fondevilla
  • C. Chattopadhyay
  • N. Khare
  • D. Rubiales
Article

Abstract

Until recently, Erysiphe pisi was thought to be the only causal agent of powdery mildew in pea, but recent studies showed that other species such as Erysiphe trifolii and Erysiphe baeumleri can also cause this disease. Three genes, er1, er2 and Er3, conferring resistance to E. pisi have been reported so far in pea. Previous studies showed that E. trifolii and E. baeumleri were able to overcome er1 resistance, but whether er2 and Er3 were effective against E. trifolii was not known. In this study, pea accessions carrying these three genes were evaluated for resistance to E. trifolii under controlled conditions at 20 and 25 °C. In addition, these accessions were also evaluated under field conditions in Spain and in India. Analysis of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences showed that E. trifolii was the causal agent of powdery mildew symptoms in lines carrying er1 in Spain and that this pathogen was also present in India. Our results showed that E. trifolii was able to overcome er1 and shows that this pathogen can also overcome Er3 resistance in some conditions. In contrast, er2 provided high level of resistance against E. trifolii in all conditions and locations studied. Temperature affected the expression of Er3 against E. trifolii, but not of er1 or er2. The pea accession JI2480, containing er2, was highly resistant and JI2302 containing er1 was susceptible to E. trifolii at both temperatures, whereas P660-4 containing Er3 was resistant at 20 °C but susceptible at 25 °C. The present study also identified sources of resistance effective against both E. pisi and E. trifolii.

Keywords

Erysiphe trifolii Erysiphe pisi Powdery mildew er1 er2 Er3 

Notes

Acknowledgments

S. Fondevilla was granted by a contract funded by the Spanish JAEdoc program. Financial support from project AGL2011-22524 (co-financed by FEDER) is acknowledged.

References

  1. Attanayake, R. N., Glawe, D. A., Dugan, F. M., & Chen, W. (2009). Erysiphe trifolii causing powdery mildew in lentil (Lens culinaris). Plant Disease, 93(8), 797–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attanayake, R. N., Glawe, D. A., McPhee, K. E., Dugan, F. M., & Chen, W. (2010). Erysiphe trifolii—a newly recognized powdery mildew pathogen of pea. Plant Pathology, 59, 712–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barilli, E., Sillero, J. C., Serrano, A., & Rubiales, D. (2009). Differential response of pea (Pisum sativum) to rusts incited by Uromyces viciae-fabae and U. pisi. Crop Protection, 28, 980–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun, U (1995) The powdery mildews (Erysiphales) of Europe. New York, USA: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Cunnington, J. H., Takamatsu, S., Lawrie, A. C., & Pascoe, I. G. (2003). Molecular identification of anamorphic powdery mildew fungi. Australasian Plant Pathology, 32, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fondevilla, S., Carver, T. L. W., Moreno, M. T., & Rubiales, D. (2006). Macroscopic and histological characterisation of genes er1 and er2 for powdery mildew resistance in pea. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 115, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fondevilla, S., Carver, T. L. W., Moreno, M. T., & Rubiales, D. (2007). Identification and characterisation of sources of resistance to Erysiphe pisi Syd. in Pisum spp. Plant Breeding, 126, 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fondevilla, S., Cubero, J. I., & Rubiales, D. (2010). Confirmation that the Er3 gene, conferring resistance to Erysiphe pisi in pea, is a different gene from er1 and er2 genes. Plant Breeding, 130, 281–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gritton, E. T., & Ebert, R. D. (1975). Interaction of planting date and powdery mildew on pea plant performance. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 100, 137–142.Google Scholar
  10. Gupta, R. P., & Singh, R. N. (2007). Mechanism of slow mildewing by Erysiphe pisi (Syd) and stability of resistance in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences India, Section B, Biological Sciences, 77(4), 423–426.Google Scholar
  11. Harland, S. C. (1948). Inheritance of immunity to mildew in Peruvian forms of Pisum sativum. Heredity, 2, 263–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heringa, R. J., Van Norel, A., & Tazelaar, M. F. (1969). Resistance to powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni D.C.) in peas (Pisum sativum L.). Euphytica, 18, 163–169.Google Scholar
  13. Kushwaha, C., Chand, R., & Srivastava, C. (2006). Role of aeciospores in outbreaks of pea (Pisum sativum) rust (Uromyces fabae). European Journal of Plant Pathology, 115, 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Little, T. M., & Hills, F. J. (1972). Statistical methods in agriculture research. Agricultural Extension: University of California.Google Scholar
  15. Ondřej, M., Dostálová, R., & Odstrčilová, L. (2005). Response of Pisum sativum germplasm resistant to Erysiphe pisi to inoculation with Erysiphe baeumleri, a new pathogen of peas. Plant Protection Science, 41, 95–103.Google Scholar
  16. Ram, B., & Prasad, C. S. (1994). Assessment of losses by powdery mildew, Erysiphe polygoni (DC) on pea. National Academy Science Letters, 17, 175–177.Google Scholar
  17. Saenz, G. S., & Taylor, J. W. (1999). Phylogeny of the Erysiphales (powdery mildews) inferred from internal transcribed spacers ribosomal DNA sequences. Canadian Journal of Botany, 77(1), 150–168.Google Scholar
  18. Singh, R. A., De, R. K., & Chaudhary, R. G. (2003). Stable resistance to powdery mildew in field pea. Indian Journal of Pulses Research, 16, 47–49.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, P. H., Foster, E. M., Boyd, L. A., & Brown, J. K. M. (1996). The early development of Erysiphe pisi on Pisum sativum L. Plant Pathology, 45, 302–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tiwari, K. R., Penner, G. A., Warkentin, T. D., & Rashid, R. Y. (1997a). Pathogenic variation in Erysiphe pisi, the causal organism of powdery mildew of pea. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 19, 267–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tiwari, K. R., Penner, G. A., & Warkentin, T. D. (1997b). Inheritance of powdery mildew resistance in pea. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 77, 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Torres, A. M., Weeden, N. F., & Martín, A. (1993). Linkage among isozyme, RFLP and RAPD markers in Vicia faba. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 85, 937–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Warkentin, T. D., Rashid, K. Y., & Xue, A. G. (1996). Fungicidal control of powdery mildew in field pea. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 76, 933–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© KNPV 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Fondevilla
    • 1
  • C. Chattopadhyay
    • 2
  • N. Khare
    • 3
  • D. Rubiales
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Sustainable AgricultureCórdobaSpain
  2. 2.Division of Crop ProtectionIndian Institute of Pulses ResearchKanpurIndia
  3. 3.Department of Plant PathologyIndira Gandhi Krishi ViswavidyalayaRaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations