Genetic variability of tolerance to Verticillium albo-atrum and Verticillium dahliae in Medicago truncatula
- 358 Downloads
Verticillium wilt caused by Verticillium albo-atrum and Verticillium dahliae is responsible for yield losses in many economically important crops. The capacity of pathogenic fungi to adapt to new hosts is a well-known threat to the durability of resistant crop varieties. In the present work, 25 Medicago truncatula genotypes from a core collection and six V. albo-atrum and V. dahliae strains were used to study the potential of non-host Verticillium strains isolated from different plant species to infect this legume plant and the plant’s susceptibility to the pathogens. The experiment was designed as factorial with randomised complete blocks and with three repetitions. The wilt symptoms caused by V. albo-atrum and V. dahliae were scored on a disease index scale from 0 to 4, during 30 days after inoculation of 10-day-old plantlets. Disease severity was quantified by maximum symptom scores (MSS) and areas under the disease progress curves (AUDPC), which integrate the time course of symptom development. Highly significant differences were observed among plant genotypes and fungal strains, and their interaction was also significant. The correlation between MSS and AUDPC was 0.86. The most severe symptoms were caused by the alfalfa strain V. albo-atrum V31-2 and the least severe by V. dahliae JR2, as shown by mean values obtained on the 25 genotypes. M. truncatula genotype TN8.3 was the most susceptible genotype by mean values obtained with the six fungal strains, whereas F11013-3, F83005.9 and DZA45.6 were highly resistant to all strains studied. The results can be used to choose parents for studying the genetics of resistance in Medicago truncatula to Verticillium strains with different levels of aggressiveness.
KeywordsDisease Resistance Susceptibility Vascular wilt Host-pathogen interaction Non-host
The authors thank the French Government for support of A. Negahi with a PhD grant; B.P.H.J. Thomma (University of Wageningen, Netherlands) for providing strains Vaa VA1, Vaa 5431, Vd JR2 and Vd S26; A. von Tiedemann (Georg-August University Göttingen, Germany) for providing strain Vaa LPP0323; and L. Gentzbittel (ENSAT, Toulouse, France) for helpful discussions.
- Acharya, S. N., & Huang, H. C. (2003). Breeding alfalfa for resistance to verticillium wilt: a sound strategy. Advances in Plant Disease Management, 2003, 345–371.Google Scholar
- Atallah, Z. K., Maruthachalam, K., du Toit, L., Koike, S. T., Davis, R. M., Klosterman, S. J., et al. (2010). Population analyses of the vascular plant pathogen Verticillium dahliae detect recombination and transcontinental gene flow. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 47, 416–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ben, C., Toueni, M., Montanari, S., Tardin, M.C., Fervel, A., Negahi, S., et al. (2012). Natural diversity in the model legume Medicago truncatula allows identification of distinct genetic mechanisms conferring partial resistance to Verticillium wilt. doi: 1093/jxb/ers337.
- Campbell, C., & Madden, L. V. (1990). Introduction to plant disease epidemiology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Djebali, N., Jauneau, A., Ameline-Torregrosa, C., Chardon, F., Jaulneau, V., Mathe, C., et al. (2009). Partial resistance of Medicago truncatula to Aphanomyces euteiches is associated with protection of the root stele and is controlled by a major QTL rich in proteasome-related genes. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 22, 1043–1052.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huang, C. H., Acharya, S. N., Jue Hou, T., Erickson, R. S., Dalton, R. E., & Mueller, C. A. (1999). Susceptibility of Chinese alfalfa cultivars to Verticillium wilt. Plant Pathology, 8, 67–72.Google Scholar
- Imin, N., Nizamidin, M., Daniher, D., Nolan, K. E., Rose, R. J., & Rolfe, B. G. (2005). Proteomic analysis of somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula explant cultures grown under 6-Benzylaminopurine and 1-Naphthaleneacetic Acid treatments. Plant Physiology, 137, 1250–1260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Julier, B., Guy, P., Castillo-Acuna, C., Caubel, G., Ecallé, C., Esquibet, M., et al. (1996). Genetic variation for disease and nematode resistances and forage quality in perennial diploid and tetraploid lucerne populations (Medicago sativa L.). Euphytica, 91, 241–250.Google Scholar
- Ronfort, J., Bataillon, T., Santoni, S., Delalande, M., David, J. L., & Prospéri, J. M. (2006). Microsatellite diversity and broad scale geographic structure in a model legume: building a set of nested core collection for studying naturally occurring variation in Medicago truncatula. BMC Plant Biology, 6, 28–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schnathorst, W. C. (1981). Life cycle and epidemiology of Verticillium. In M. A. Mace, A. A. Bell, & C. H. Beckman (Eds.), Fungal Wilt Diseases of Plants (pp. 81–111). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Stewart, S. A., Hodge, S., Ismail, N., Mansfield, J. W., Feys, B. J., Prospéri, J. M., et al. (2009). The RAP1 gene confers effective, race-specific resistance to the pea aphid in Medicago truncatula independent of the hypersensitive reaction. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 22, 1645–1655.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Torregrosa, C., Cluzet, S., Fournier, J., Huguet, T., Gamas, P., Prospéri, J. M., et al. (2004). Cytological, genetic, and molecular analysis to characterize compatible and incompatible interactions between Medicago truncatula and Colletotrichum trifolii. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 17, 272–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vailleau, F., Sartorel, E., Jardinaud, M., Chardon, F., Genin, S., Huguet, T., et al. (2007). Characterization of the interaction between the bacterial wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum and the model legume plant Medicago truncatula. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 20, 159–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yang, S., Gao, M., Xu, C., Gao, J., Deshpande, S., Lin, S., et al. (2008). Alfalfa benefits from Medicago truncatula: the RCT1 gene from M. truncatula confers broad-spectrum resistance to anthracnose in alfalfa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 105(34), 12164–12169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar