European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 127, Issue 2, pp 185–197 | Cite as

Genetic variability and pathological properties of Grapevine Leafroll-associated Virus 2 isolates

  • Nadia Bertazzon
  • Michele Borgo
  • Stefano Vanin
  • Elisa Angelini


The genetic variability among Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 (GLRaV-2) isolates was investigated in several grapevine accessions from various geographic origins in three genomic fragments, which encode the 70 kDa heat-shock protein homologue, the coat protein and the ∼60 kDa protein. The majority of the isolates were identical or only slightly different from one another and formed a monophyletic group. Several other variants were found which differed greatly from the main cluster and were mostly present in autochthonous or specific vine cultivars. Phylogenetic analyses on the CP gene sequences, including the isolates analyzed in this work and some others from related literature, allowed five clades to be identified (PN, H4, RG, BD and PV20). Biological trials for graft incompatibility and leafroll symptoms revealed that GLRaV-2 divergent variants had different pathological properties, mainly according to their phylogenetic grouping. The BD isolate seemed to be a mild variant of the virus, because it was unable to induce graft incompatibility and it rarely caused leafroll symptoms. The RG isolate appeared to be a more virulent variant, given the strong decrease in rooted grafted grapevines obtained in nursery, in particular with the use of certain rootstocks; however, it does not induce leafroll symptoms. The variants belonging to the PN group, which were the most widespread, caused both graft incompatibility and leafroll symptoms, according to the viral variant. Graft incompatibility also proved to depend strongly on the rootstock used.


Closterovirus GLRaV-2 Incompatibility Leafroll 





Coat protein


Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2


Grapevine rupestris stem pitting associated virus


Heteroduplex Mobility Assay


Heat-shock protein 70


Maximum likelihood


Maximum parsimony


∼60 kDa protein


Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic mean



The authors are grateful to the following scientists who kindly supplied GLRaV-2-infected grapevine accessions: M. Fuchs (Cornell University, Geneva, NY, USA), P. Gugerli (RAC, Changins, Switzerland), D. Boscia, A. Minafra and P. Saldarelli (CNR, Bari, Italy). The authors are also very grateful to I. Bazzo, L. Filippin, L. Lovat, E. Patriarca, G. Perini (CRA-VIT, Conegliano, TV, Italy) and E. Trevisan (University of Venice, Italy) for their technical assistance and to R. Davison for checking the English text.

Supplementary material

10658_2010_9583_Fig2_ESM.jpg (176 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 2

Leafroll symptoms on GLRaV-2 infected Cabernet franc indicator used in the biological trials (JPEG 176 kb)

10658_2010_9583_Fig3_ESM.jpg (198 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 3

Field biological trial for graft incompatibility: a) View of the nursery (JPEG 198 kb); b) Detail of a plantlet showing gratf incompatibility (JPEG 121 kb)

10658_2010_9583_Fig4_ESM.jpg (122 kb)
Supplementary Fig. 3

Field biological trial for graft incompatibility: a) View of the nursery (JPEG 198 kb); b) Detail of a plantlet showing gratf incompatibility (JPEG 121 kb)


  1. Abou Ghanem, N., Sabanadzovic, S., Minafra, A., Saldarelli, P., & Martelli, G. P. (1998). Some properties of grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 and molecular organization of the 3’ region of the viral genome. Journal of Plant Pathology, 80, 37–46.Google Scholar
  2. Abou Ghanem-Sabanadzovic, N., Sabanadzovic, S., Castellano, M. A., Boscia, D., & Martelli, G. P. (2000). Properties of a new isolate of grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2. Vitis, 39, 119–121.Google Scholar
  3. Bertazzon, N., & Angelini, E. (2004). Advances in the detection of grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 variants. Journal of Plant Pathology, 86, 283–290.Google Scholar
  4. Bertazzon, N., Angelini, E. & Borgo, M. (2006). Characterization of grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 strain BD. Proceedings of the XV Meeting of the International Council for the Study of Virus and Virus-like Diseases of the Grapevine, (pp 22–24). Stellenbosch, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  5. Beuve, M., Sempè, L., & Lemaire, O. (2007). A sensitive one-step real-time RT-PCR method for detecting Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 variants in grapevine. Journal of Virological Methods, 141, 117–134.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonfiglioli, R., Edwards, F., Hoskins, N., & Pantaleo, A. (2003). Graft incompatibility syndrome in New Zealand Merlot vines involves another possible variant of GLRaV-2. Australian & New Zealand Grapegrower & Winemaker, 476, 50–54.Google Scholar
  7. Castresana, J. (2000). Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 17, 540–552.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dayhoff, M. O., Schwartz, R. M. & Orcutt, B. C. (1978). A model of evolutionary change in proteins. (In National Biomedical Research Foundation (Eds.), Atlas of protein sequence and structure (Vol. 5, Suppl 3, pp. 345-352). Washington DC.)Google Scholar
  9. Delwart, E. L., Shpaer, E. G., & Mullins, J. I. (1995). Heteroduplex mobility assay for phylogenetic analysis. In M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, & J. J. Sninsky (Eds.), PCR strategies (pp. 154–60). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Felsenstein, J. (2002). PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6a3. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
  12. Felsenstein, J. (2003). Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland: Sinauer associated.Google Scholar
  13. Goszczynski, D. E., Kasdorf, G. G. F., Pietersen, G., & Van Tonder, H. (1996). Detection of two strains of grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2. Vitis, 35, 133–135.Google Scholar
  14. Greif, C., Garau, R., Boscia, D., Prota, V. A., Fiori, M., Bass, P., et al. (1995). The relationship of grapevine leafroll-associated closterovirus 2 with a graft incompatibility condition of grapevine. Phytopathologia mediterranea, 34, 167–173.Google Scholar
  15. Gugerli, P., Brugger, J. J., & Bovey, R. (1984). L’enroulement de la vigne: mise en évidence de particules virales et développement d’une méthode immuno-enzymatique pour le diagnostic rapid. Revue suisse de viticulture, arboriculture, horticulture, 16, 299–304.Google Scholar
  16. Guindon, S., & Gascuel, O. (2003). A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology, 52, 696–704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kong, P., Rubio, L., Polek, M., & Falk, B. W. (2000). Population structure and genetic diversity within California Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) isolates. Virus Genes, 21, 139–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, R. F., & Bar-Joseph, M. (2000). Tristeza. In L. W. Timmer, S. M. Garnsey, & J. H. Graham (Eds.), Compendium of citrus diseases (pp. 61–63). St. Paul: American Phytopathological Society.Google Scholar
  19. Little, A., Fazeli, C. F., & Rezaian, M. A. (2001). Hypervariable genes in grapevine leafroll associated virus 1. Virus Research, 80, 109–116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu, Y.-P., Peremyslov, V. V., Medina, V., & Dolja, V. V. (2009). Tandem leader proteases of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus-2: Host-specific functions in the infection cycle. Virology, 383, 291–299.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. MacKenzie, D. J., McLean, M. A., Mukerji, S., & Green, M. (1997). Improved RNA extraction from woody plants for the detection of viral pathogens by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Plant Disease, 81, 222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martelli, G. P., Agranovsky, A. A., Bar-Joseph, M., Boscia, D., Candresse, T., Coutts, R. H. A., et al. (2002). The family Closteroviridae revised. Archives of Virology, 147, 2039–2044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Meng, B., Li, C., Goszczynski, D. E., & Gonsalves, D. (2005). Genome sequences and structures of two biologically distinct strains of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 and sequence analysis. Virus Genes, 31, 31–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakaune, R., & Nakano, M. (2006). Efficient methods for sample processing and cDNA synthesis by RT-PCR for the detection of grapevine viruses and viroids. Journal of Virological Methods, 134, 244–249.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pirolo, C., Boscia, D., La Notte, P., Campanale, A., Savino, & V., Martelli, G. P. (2006). Further evidence of the involvement of Grapevine leafroll associated Virus 2 in graft incompatibility. Proceedings of the XV Meeting of the International Council for the Study of Virus and Virus-like Diseases of the Grapevine (pp. 242–243). Stellenbosch, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  26. Prosser, S. W., Goszczynski, D. E., & Meng, B. (2007). Molecular analysis of double stranded RNAs reveals complex infection of grapevines with multiple viruses. Virus Research, 124, 151–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rowhani, A., Zhang, Y. P., Golino, D. A., & Uyemoto, J. K. (2000). Isolation and partial characterization of two new viruses from grapevine. Proceedings of the XIII Meeting of the International Council for the Study of Virus and Virus-like Diseases of the Grapevine (p. 82). Adelaide, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  28. Turturo, C., Saldarelli, P., Yafeng, D., Digiaro, M., Minafra, A., Savino, V., et al. (2005). Genetic variability and population structure of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 isolates. Journal of General Virology, 86, 217–224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Uyemoto, J. K., Rowhani, A., Luvisi, D., & Randy Krag, C. (2001). New closterovirus in Redglobe grape causes decline of grafted plants. California Agricolture, 55, 28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang, K., & Hiruki, C. (1999). Rapid detection of a single-base-pair mutation in phytoplasmal conserved genes by DNA heteroduplex mobility assay (HMA). Proceedings. Japan Academy, 75(B), 259–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xu, Z. Y., Hong, N., Xing, B., & Wang, G. P. (2006). Partial molecular characterization of a Chinese isolate of grapevine leafroll-associated virus 2 and production of antisera to recombinant viral proteins. Journal of Plant Pathology, 88, 89–94.Google Scholar
  32. Zhu, H. Y., Ling, K. S., Goszczynski, D. E., McFerson, J. R., & Gonsalves, D. (1998). Nucleotide sequence and genome organization of grapevine leafroll-associated virus-2 are similar to beet yellows virus, the closterovirus type member. Journal of General Virology, 79, 1289–1298.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© KNPV 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadia Bertazzon
    • 1
  • Michele Borgo
    • 1
  • Stefano Vanin
    • 2
  • Elisa Angelini
    • 1
  1. 1.CRA-VIT Centro di Ricerca per la ViticolturaConeglianoItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di BiologiaUniversità di PadovaPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations