Assessment of sanitation and fungicide application directed at cocoa tree trunks for the control of Phytophthora black pod infections in pods growing in the canopy

  • Isaac Y. Opoku
  • Andrews Y. Akrofi
  • Alex A. Appiah
Full Research Paper


Studies were conducted in two cocoa-growing areas of Ghana, one solely affected by Phytophthora palmivora and the other predominantly by Phytophthora megakarya, to determine the effectiveness of sanitation practices and fungicide application on tree trunks for the control of black pod disease in the canopy. Sanitation practices including weeding, pruning, thinning, shade reduction and removal of mummified pods were carried out prior to fungicide applications, and diseased pods were routinely removed at monthly intervals during harvesting. Three types of fungicides were used: systemic (Foli-R-Fos 400) applied as injection into the main trunks, semi-systemic (Ridomil 72 plus) and contact (Nordox 75, Kocide 101, Kocide DF, Blue Shield and Funguran-OH) applied as sprays onto pods on the main trunk. Sanitation combined with fungicide application on the trunk significantly reduced black pod disease incidence in the tree canopy. For fungicides applied as a spray, Ridomil 72 plus at 3.3 g l−1 and Kocide DF at 10 g l−1 and as injection, 40 ml Foli-R-Fos 400 injected twice a year, performed better than the other fungicide treatments. The position of pods significantly influenced the incidence of canopy black pod infection in the P. megakarya predominantly affected area but to a lesser extent in the P. palmivora solely affected area. However, no significant interactions were found between fungicide treatments and the position of pods on the tree in both disease areas. The determined trunk-canopy relationship in the development of black pod disease on cocoa can be used in disease control programmes to maximise the impact of sanitation practices, achieve judicious application of fungicides, thereby reducing the environmental impact of fungicides on the cocoa ecosystem, and ultimately increase the economic returns.


Phytophthora megakarya Phytophthora palmivora Theobroma cacao Trunk Canopy Systemic and contact fungicides Disease control 



The technical assistance provided by mycology staff of the Plant Pathology Division is gratefully appreciated. This paper is published with the permission of the Executive Director, CRIG, Tafo.


  1. Akrofi, A. Y., Appiah, A. A., & Opoku, I. Y. (2003). Management of Phytophthora pod rot disease on cocoa farms in Ghana. Crop Protection, 22(3), 469–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appiah, A. A. (2001). Variability of Phytophthora species causing black pod disease of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) and implications for assessment of host resistance. London, UK: PhD Thesis University of London.Google Scholar
  3. Appiah, A. A., Flood, J., Archer, S. A., & Bridge, P. D. (2004). Molecular analysis of the major Phytophthora species on cocoa. Plant Pathology, 53, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Appiah, A. A., Opoku, I. Y., & Akrofi, A. Y. (2004). Natural occurrence and distribution of stem cankers caused by Phytophthora megakarya and Phytophthora palmivora on cocoa. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 110, 983–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asare-Nyako, A. (1972). Sources of primary inoculum of Phytophthora palmivora in cocoa fields in Ghana (pp 65–68). Annual Report Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana, 1967–1970.Google Scholar
  6. Brasier, C. M., Griffin, M. J., & Maddison, A. C. (1981). Cocoa black pod Phytophthoras. In: P. H. Gregory & A. C. Maddison (Eds.), Epidemiology of Phytophthora on Cocoa in Nigeria, Phytopathological Paper No. 25 (pp. 18–30). U.K.: Commonwealth Mycological Institute Kew.Google Scholar
  7. Dade, H. A. (1928). The relationship between diseased cushions and the seasonal outbreaks of black pod disease of cocoa. Bulletin Department of Agriculture Gold Coast, 13, 85–88.Google Scholar
  8. Dakwa, J. T. (1974). The occurrence of Phytophthora palmivora (Butl) Butl in soil in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science, 7, 37–41.Google Scholar
  9. Dakwa, J. T. (1987). A serious outbreak of black pod disease in a marginal area of Ghana. In: Cocoa Producers’ Alliance (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Cocoa Research Conference (pp. 447–451). Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.Google Scholar
  10. Guest, D. I., & Bompeix, G. (1990). The complex mode of action of phosphonates. Australasian Plant Pathology, 19(4), 113–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ICCO (1998) ICCO Quarterly Bulletin on Cocoa Statistics (Vol. XXIV(3)). London, UK: International Cocoa Organization.Google Scholar
  12. Lockwood, G., & Edward, D. F. (1980). Determination of pod and bean characters in progeny trials with cocoa. Tropical Agriculture, 57, 289–300.Google Scholar
  13. Luterbacher, M. C. (1994). Identification, epidemiology and control of Phytophthora megakarya on cocoa in West Africa. London, UK: PhD Thesis University of London.Google Scholar
  14. Maddison, A. C., & Griffin M. J. (1981). Detection and movement of inoculum. In: P. H. Gregory & A. C. Maddison (Eds.), Epidemiology of Phytophthora on Cocoa in Nigeria, Phytopathological Paper No 25 (pp. 31–49). UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew.Google Scholar
  15. Muller, R. A. (1974). Integrated control methods. In: P. H. Gregory (Ed.), Phytophthora disease of cocoa (pp. 259–268). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  16. Muller , R. A. (1980). Survival in soil. In: G. A. Enriquez & G. A. Zentmyer (Eds.), Proceedings of the American Regional Group of Phytophthora palmivora on cocoa (p. 6), 1980. Technical Report 16 .Google Scholar
  17. Newhook, F. J., & Jackson, G. V. H. (1977). Phytophthora palmivora in cocoa plantation soils in the Solomon Islands. Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 69(1), 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Opoku , I. Y. (1994). Survival of Phytophthora palmivora and Phytophthora megakarya in soil and in cocoa roots. London: PhD Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
  19. Opoku, I. Y., & Owusu, G. K. (1995). A severe type of black pod disease in Ghana. Newsletter Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana, 11, 1–4.Google Scholar
  20. Opoku, I. Y., Akrofi, A. Y., & Appiah, A. A. (1995). Phytophthora pod rot control studies: On-station researcher managed field trials (pp. 111–127). Annual Report of the Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana.Google Scholar
  21. Opoku, I. Y., Appiah, A. A., Akrofi, A. Y., & Owusu, G. K. (2000). Phytophthora megakarya: A potential threat to the cocoa industry in Ghana? Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science, 33, 237–248.Google Scholar
  22. Schieber, E., & Zentmyer, G. A. (1978). An important canker disease of Grevilla in Guatemala. Plant Disease Reporter, 62(10), 923–924.Google Scholar
  23. Tarjot, M. (1971). Quelques precisions sur le role de l’environement dan le comportment des cabosses decacoyer envers le Phytophthora palmivora (Butl). Butl. en Cote d’Ivoire. Café Cacao Thé, XV, 215–240.Google Scholar
  24. Thorold, C. A. (1975). Diseases of Cocoa (423 pp). Oxford: Clarenden Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wood, G. A., & Lass, R. A. (1985). Cocoa (4th ed.). London: Tropical Agricultural Series, Longman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isaac Y. Opoku
    • 1
  • Andrews Y. Akrofi
    • 1
  • Alex A. Appiah
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (CRIG)Tafo, AkimGhana
  2. 2.Environmental Entomology and Plant PathologyCentral Science LaboratorySand Hutton, YorkUK

Personalised recommendations