Advertisement

European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 118, Issue 1, pp 11–22 | Cite as

Real-time Scorpion-PCR detection and quantification of Erwinia amylovora on pear leaves and flowers

  • Palmira De Bellis
  • Leonardo Schena
  • Corrado Cariddi
Full Research Paper

Abstract

A specific primer couple (E3–E4) amplifying a single DNA fragment of 111 bp from plasmid pEA29 was designed to identify, detect and quantify Erwinia amylovora by real-time Scorpion-PCR. Specificity of primers and probe was assessed both by means of BLAST analyses and by using genomic DNA from a large number of E. amylovora isolates and other bacteria. In Scorpion-PCR, the limit of detection was of 1 pg of total DNA and a high correlation (r = 0.999) was achieved between target DNA quantity and cycle threshold (Ct). Combining two sequential amplifications with conventional reported primers (PEANT1–PEANT2) and Scorpion primers (E3 Scorpion-E4) the detection limit was of 1 fg (nested Scorpion-PCR). Using serial dilution of the bacterial suspensions the limit of detection was 3.2 × 104 CFU ml−1 in Scorpion-PCR and 2.8 × 102 CFU ml−1 in nested Scorpion-PCR. Real-time PCR combined with effective procedures for DNA extraction enabled the detection and the quantification of the epiphytic population of E. amylovora in the washings of flowers and leaves of artificially inoculated pear. A significant correlation (r = 0.92) was achieved between pathogen CFU on semi-selective media and the corresponding target DNA concentration evaluated by real-time PCR.

Keywords

Fire Blight Molecular detection Nested PCR Plasmid pEA29 Scorpion-PCR (duplex format) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the University of Bari: ‘Epidemiology and genetics of plant-pathogen microrganisms’. We thank J.D. Janse Jr. at Department of Bacteriology, Plant Protection Service, Wageningen, The Netherlands, C. Bazzi at Department of Agroenvironmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Bologna, Italy, M. Scortichini at Fruit Tree Research Institute, Rome, Italy, and L. Corazza at Plant Pathology Research Institute, Rome, Italy, for kindly supplying bacterial isolates.

References

  1. Bereswill, S., Bugert, P., Bruchmuller, I., & Geider, K. (1995). Identification of the fire blight pathogen, Erwinia amylovora, by PCR assays with chromosomal DNA. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61, 2636–2642.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bereswill, S., Pahl, P., Bellerman, P., Zeller, W., & Geider, K. (1992). Sensitive and species-specific detection of Erwinia amylovora by PCR analysis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 58, 3522–3526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonn, W. G., & van der Zwet, T. (2000). Distribution and economic importance of Fire Blight. In J. L. Vanneste (Ed.), Fire Blight: The disease and its causative agent Erwinia amylovora (pp. 235–251). Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Crosse, J. E., & Goodman, R. N. (1973). A selective medium for and a definitive colony characteristic of Erwinia amylovora. Phytopathology, 63, 1425–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Falkenstein, H., Bellemann, P., Walter, S., Zeller, W., & Geider, K. (1988). Identification of Erwinia amylovora, the fireblight pathogen, by colony hybridization with plasmid pEA29. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 54, 2798–2802.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ginzinger, D. G. (2002). Gene quantification using real-time quantitative PCR: an emerging technology hits the mainstream. Experimental Hematology, 30, 503–512.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayden, K. J., Rizzo, D., Tse, J., & Garbelotto, M. (2004). Detection and quantification of Phytophthora ramorum from California forests using a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. Phytopathology, 94, 1075–1083.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ippolito, A., Schena, L., Nigro, F., Soleti Ligorio, V., & Yaseen, T. (2004). Real-time detection of Phytophthora nicotianae and P. citrophthora in citrus roots and soil. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 110, 833–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson, K. B., & Stockwell, V. O. (1998). Management of fire blight: A case study in microbial ecology. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 36, 227–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Llop, P., Bonaterra, A., Penalver, J., & Lopez, M. M. (2000). Development of highly sensitive nested-PCR procedure using a single closed tube for detection of Erwinia amylovora in asymptomatic plant material. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 2071–2078.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McGhee, G. C., & Jones, A. L. (2000). Complete nucleotide sequence of ubiquitous plasmid pEA29 from Erwinia amylovora strain Ea88: gene organization and intraspecies variation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 4897–4907.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McManus, P. S., & Jones, A. L. (1995). Detection of Erwinia amylovora by nested PCR and PCR-dot-blot and reverse blot hybridizations. Phytopathology, 85, 618–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Momol, M., Norelli, J., Piccioni, D., Momol, E. A., Gustafson, H. L., Cummins, J. N., & Aldwinckle, H. S. (1998). Internal movement of Erwinia amylovora through symptomless apple scion tissues into the rootstock. Plant Disease, 82, 646–650.Google Scholar
  14. Salm, H., & Geider, K. (2004). Real-time PCR for detection and quantification of Erwinia amylovora, the causal agent of fireblight. Plant Pathology, 53, 602–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schaad, N. W., Frederick, R. D., Shaw, J., Schneider, W. L., Hickson, R., Petrillo, M. D., & Luster, D. G. (2003). Advances in molecular-based diagnostics in meeting crop biosecurity and phytosanitary issues. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 41, 305–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schena, L., & Ippolito, A. (2003). Rapid, and sensitive detection of Rosellinia necatrix in roots and soils by real-time Scorpion-PCR. Journal of Plant Pathology, 85, 15–25.Google Scholar
  17. Schena, L., Nigro, F., & Ippolito, A (2002). Identification and detection of Rosellinia necatrix by conventional and real-time Scorpion-PCR. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 108, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schena, L., Nigro, F., Ippolito, A., & Gallitelli, D. (2004). Real-time quantitative PCR: a new technology to detect and study phytopathogenic and antagonistic fungi. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 110, 893–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Solinas, A., Brown, L. J., McKeen, C., Mellor, J. M., Nicol, J. T. G., Thelwell, N., & Brown, T. (2001). Duplex Scorpion primers in SNP analysis and FRET applications. Nucleic Acids Research, 29, 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Taylor, R. K., Guilford, P. J., Clark, R. G., Hale, C. N., & Forster, R. L. S. (2001). Detection of Erwinia amylovora in plant material using novel polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 29, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thelwell, N., Millington, S., Solinas, A., Booth, J., & Brown, T. (2000). Mode of action and application of Scorpion primers to mutation detection. Nucleic Acids Research, 28, 3752–3761.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thomson, S. V. (1986). The role of the stigma in fire blight infections. Phytopathology, 76, 476–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thomson, S. V. (2000). Epidemiology of fire blight. In J. L. Vanneste (Ed.), Fire Blight: the disease and its causative agent, Erwinia amylovora (pp. 9–36). Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. van der Zwet, T. (2002) Present worldwide distribution of fire blight. Acta Horticulturae, 590, 33–34.Google Scholar
  25. Vanneste, J. L. (1995). Erwinia amylovora. In U. S. Singh, R. P. Singh, & K. Kohomoto (Eds.), Pathogenesis and host specificity in plant diseases: Histopathological, biochemical, genetic and molecolar bases, (Vol. 1) (33 pp). Oxford and London: Pergammon Press.Google Scholar
  26. Vanneste, J. L. (2000). Fire blight: the disease and its causative agent, Erwinia amylovora. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  27. Whitcombe, D., Theaker, J., Guy, S. P., Brown, T., Little, S. (1999). Detection of PCR products using self-probing amplicons and fluorescence. Nature Biotechnology, 17, 804–807.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Palmira De Bellis
    • 1
  • Leonardo Schena
    • 2
  • Corrado Cariddi
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Sciences of Food ProductionNational Research CouncilBariItaly
  2. 2.Department of Plant Protection and Applied MicrobiologyUniversity of BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations