European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 111, Issue 2, pp 157–168 | Cite as

The widespread occurrence of overwintered conidial inoculum of Venturia inaequalis on shoots and buds in organic and integrated apple orchards across the Netherlands

  • Imre J. Holb
  • Bart Heijne
  • Michael J. Jeger


A 2-year study was conducted to determine the widespread occurrence of overwintered conidial inoculum of Venturia inaequalis and its impact on the apple scab control in 18 apple orchards (organic and integrated) with various levels of scab in the Netherlands. Autumn assessments of scab lesions showed that the integrated orchards had a significantly lower scab incidence (<20%) compared to that of the organic orchards (>60%). At the bud-break phenological stage, the mean numbers of nonviable and viable conidia on 1 cm pieces of shoots ranged from 1 to about 90 and from 6 to more than 1000 in the integrated and the organic orchards, respectively, for both years. However, viable conidia on shoots were found only in 2 integrated and 6 organic orchards out of the 18 and the viability of conidia was below 2%. The mean numbers of viable and nonviable conidia per 100 buds ranged from 24 to more than 1000 and from 230 to almost 5000 in the integrated and the organic orchards, respectively, for both years. In both years, some 60–85% of the conidia was found on the outer bud scales. The percentage viability associated with the outer bud tissues was below 2% for all the orchards. However, the percentage of viable conidia within the inner bud tissues ranged from 0% to 6% in the integrated and from 2% to 11% in the organic orchards for both years. Differences between the organic and the integrated orchards were clearly demonstrated for overwintered conidia associated with both shoot and bud samples. The relationship between autumn scab incidence and numbers of overwintered conidia associated with shoots or buds was exponential. If the autumn scab incidence was above 40%, then the number of overwintered conidia markedly increased. We conclude that specific treatments for overwintering conidia of Venturia inaequalis may not be necessary in integrated orchards with a low scab incidence in the previous autumn. However, the risk of early scab epidemics initiated by overwintered conidia potentially is high in organic orchards. Preventative measures in early spring and also in the previous year must be established in these orchards.


apple scab epidemiology integrated production organic production overwintering of conidia scab control 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anonymous (1998a) Milieubewuste Teelt. Fruitteelt 88(9) Appendix (in Dutch).Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1998b) SKAL Informatie Handboek, Statuten, regelingen en voorschriften; PR.PR1/A.29 Google Scholar
  3. Becker CM (1990) Overwintering of the anamorph of Venturia inaequalis (Spilocaea pomi) in apple buds and the viability of conidia as affected by discontinuous wetting. PhD Thesis, Cornell University, USA, 86 pp Google Scholar
  4. Becker, CM, Burr, TJ, Smith, CA 1992Overwintering of conidia of Venturia inaequalis in apple buds in New York orchardsPlant Disease76121126Google Scholar
  5. Cook, MT, Schwarze, CA 1917Apple scab on the twigsPhytopathology7221222Google Scholar
  6. Cook, RTA 1974Pustules on wood as sources of inoculum in apple scab and their response to chemical treatmentsAnnals of Applied Biology7719Google Scholar
  7. Dillion Weston, WAR, Petherbridge, FR 1933Apple and pear scab in East AngliaJournal of Pomology and Horticultural Science11185198Google Scholar
  8. Dillion Weston, WAR, Storey, IF, Ives, JV 1952Apple scab in the Wisbech areaGarden Chronolog1321195Google Scholar
  9. Ellis, MA, Ferree, DC, Madden, LV 1998Effects of an apple scab-resistant cultivar on use patterns of inorganic and organic fungicides and economics of disease controlPlant Disease82428433Google Scholar
  10. Ellis, MA, Madden, LV, Wilson, LL, Ferree, DC 1994Evaluations of organic and conventional fungicide programs for control of apple scab in OhioOhio Agricultural Research Development Centre Research2986368Google Scholar
  11. Genstat 5 Committee1997Genstat 5 Release 4.1 Reference Manual and Supplement.Clarendon PressOxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Gloyer, WO 1937Evaluation of the Genova experiment on scab controlPhytopathology27129Abstr.Google Scholar
  13. Holb IJ (2001) [Epidemiological investigations of apple scab in integrated and organic apple orchards.] PhD Thesis, Debrecen University Press, Debrecen, Hungary, 149 pp (in Hungarian) Google Scholar
  14. Holb, IJ, Heijne, B, Jeger, MJ 2004Overwintering of conidia of Venturia inaequalis and its contribution to early epidemics of apple scabPlant Disease88751757Google Scholar
  15. Holb, IJ, Heijne, B, Jeger, MJ 2003aSummer epidemics of apple scab: The relationship between measurements and their implications for the development of predictive models and threshold levels under different disease control regimesJournal of Phytopathology151335343Google Scholar
  16. Holb, IJ, Jong, PF, Heijne, B 2003bEfficacy and phytotoxicity of lime sulphur in organic apple productionAnnals of Applied Biology142225233Google Scholar
  17. Hill, SA 1975The importance of wood scab caused by Venturia inaequalis (Cke) Wint. as source of infection for apple leaves in the spring.Phytopathologische Zeitschrift82216223Google Scholar
  18. Jeffrey, MW 1953Preliminary investigation into the life cycle of Venturia inaequalis (Cooke) Wint. in South Australia.Australian Journal of Agricultural Research4415422Google Scholar
  19. Jeger, MJ, Swait, AAJ, Butt, DJ 1982Overwintering of Venturia inaequalis, the causal agent of apple scab, on different apple cultivarsAnnals of Applied Biology1009198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kennel W (1981) Zum auftreten von Schorfkonidien auf äußerlich unversehrter Rinde von Apfelzweigen. (Abstr.) Mitteilung aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft (Berlin-Dahlem) 203: 117 Google Scholar
  21. Louw, AJ 1951Studies on the influence of environmental factors on the overwintering and epiphytology of apple scab (Venturia inaequalis [Cke.] Wint.) in the winter-rainfall area of the Cape ProvinceUnion of South African Department of Agricultural Science Bulletin310147Google Scholar
  22. MacHardy, WE, Gadoury, DM 1989A revision of Mills’ criteria for predicting apple scab infection periodsPhytopathology79304310Google Scholar
  23. MacHardy, WE, Jeger, MJ 1983Integrating control measures for management of primary apple scab, Venturia inaequalisProtection Ecology5103125Google Scholar
  24. MacHardy, WE, Gadoury, DM, Rosenberger, DA 1993Delaying the onset of fungicide programs for control of apple scab in orchards of low potential ascospore dose of Venturia inaequalisPlant Disease77372375Google Scholar
  25. Marsh, RW, Walker, MM 1932The scab fungus (Venturia inaequalis) on apple shootsJournal of Pomology and Horticultural Science107190Google Scholar
  26. McAlpine, D 1902The apple scab fungus causing black spot of apple and pearVictoria Agriculture Department Journal1703708Google Scholar
  27. McKay, R 1938Conidia from infected bud-scales and adjacent wood as a main source of primary infection with the apple scab fungus Venturia inaequalis (Cooke) WintThe Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society21623640Google Scholar
  28. Moosherr W (1990) Untersuchungen zu superfiziellen Schorf und Knopfenschorf (Venturia inaequalis [Cke.] Wint.) beim Apfel. PhD Thesis, Universität Hohenheim Press, Hohenheim, Germany, 84 pp Google Scholar
  29. Moosherr W and Kennel W (1986) Zur epidemiologischen Bedeutung von superfiziellen Zweigschorf bei Apfelbäumen. Mitteilung aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft (Berlin-Dahlem) 232: 212 Google Scholar
  30. Moosherr, W, Kennel, W 1995Investigations on superficial apple scab on apple shootsJournal of Plant Diseases and Protection102171183Google Scholar
  31. Salmon, ES, Ware, MW 1931A new fact in the life history of the apple scab fungusGarden Chronolog89437438Google Scholar
  32. Sivanesan, A, Waller, JM 1974Venturia inaequalis. No. 401. In: CMI Descriptions of Pathogenic Fungi and Bacteria.Commonwealth Mycological InstituteKew, Surrey, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  33. Sokal, RR, Rohlf, FJ 1981Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research.WH Freeman & CoNew York, USAGoogle Scholar
  34. Stensvand, A, Amundsen, T, Semb, L 1996Observations on wood scab caused by Venturia inaequalis and V. pirina in Norway.Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences10533540Google Scholar
  35. Sutton, DK, MacHardy, WE 1993The reduction of ascosporic inoculum of Venturia inaequalis by orchard sanitationPhytopathology83247Abstr.Google Scholar
  36. Sutton, DK, MacHardy, WE, Lord, WG 2000Effects of shredding or treating apple leaf with urea on ascospore dose of Venturia inaequalis and disease buildupPlant Disease8413191326Google Scholar
  37. Swinburne, TR 1965Apple scab infection of young wood of Bramley’s seedling trees in Northern IrelandPlant Pathology142325Google Scholar
  38. Szkolnik, M 1969Maturation and discharge of ascospores of Venturia inaequalisPlant Disease Reporter53534537Google Scholar
  39. Umemoto, S 1991Infection of bud scales with conidia of Japanese pear scab fungus, Venturia nashicolaAnnals of Phytopathological Society of Japan57188195(in Japanese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant Protection, Centre for Agricultural SciencesUniversity of DebrecenDebrecenHungary
  2. 2.Applied Plant ResearchZettenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural SciencesImperial College LondonWye, Ashford, KentUK

Personalised recommendations