Entrepreneurship and enforcement institutions: disaggregated evidence for Spain
- 315 Downloads
Entry of new firms, both in the form of entrepreneurs or corporations, fosters competition and productivity. Both the entry of firms and productivity have been low in the Spanish economy over the recent years. This paper analyzes the determinants of entry focusing on the role of the design and efficacy of enforcement institutions (the judicial system), a traditionally overlooked aspect. In order to do so, we examine disaggregated data at the local level in Spain. We find that higher judicial efficacy increases the entry rate of firms, while it has no effect on the exit rate. Crucially, that impact only occurs in the case of the entry rates of entrepreneurs, defined as self-employed, but not in the case of limited liability corporations. This finding may be explained by the fact that judicial (in)efficacy can be regarded as a fixed cost to be paid by agents that litigate. Hence, the economic activity of entrepreneurs -and specifically, their entry into the market- is expected to be more affected than that of larger firms.
KeywordsEntrepreneurship Judicial efficacy Barriers to entry
JEL ClassificationL26 M13 K40 R12
We are grateful to participants in the Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum (Stockholm), the XXXVIII Simposio of the Spanish Economic Association (Santander), the Economic Analysis of Litigation Workshop (Catania), the research seminar of the Banco de España and the CFCM seminar at the University of Nottingham. We wish to thank Pontus Braunerhjelm, Johan Eklund, Javier J. Perez, Giovanni B. Ramello, Margarita Rubio, José Carrasco, Claire McHugh, Rocío Prieto and to two anonymous referees for their useful comments and suggestions. We thank as well Ildefonso Villan Criado (CGPJ) for his advice in the use of the judicial performance data and Marcos Marchetti for excellent research assistance. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Banco de España or the Eurosystem.
- Ardagna, S., & Lusardi, A. (2010). The international differences in entrepreneurship. In J. Lerner & A. Schoar (Eds.), Explaining international differences in entrepreneurship: The role of individual characteristics and regulatory constraints. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Audretsch, D. B. (2002). Entrepreneurship: A survey of the literature: Report prepared for European Commission. Brussels: Enterprise Directorate General. Brussels European Commission.Google Scholar
- Baliamoune-Lutz, M., & Garello, P. (2014). Tax structure and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 42, 165–190.Google Scholar
- Brandt, N. (2004). Business dynamics in Europe. OECD Science, Technology and Industry. Working Papers, 2004/1, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Branstetter, L., Lima, F., Taylor, L. J., & Venâncio, A. (2014). Do entry regulations deter entrepreneurship and job creation? Evidence from recent reforms in Portugal. The Economic Journal, 124(577), 805–832.Google Scholar
- Carmignani A., & Giacomelli, S. (2010). Too many Lawyers? Litigation in Italian civil courts. Temi di Discussione 745, Banca d’Italia.Google Scholar
- Círculo de Empresarios (2003). Justicia, economía y empresa. Spain: Madrid.Google Scholar
- Commission, European. (2012). Effects and impact of entrepreneurship programmes in higher education. Brussels: European Union.Google Scholar
- Desai, M., Gompers, P., & Lerner. J (2005). Institutions, capital constraints and entrepreneurial firm dynamics: Evidence from Europe, Harvard NOM Working Paper No. 03-59.Google Scholar
- Djankov, S., Ganser, T., McLiesh, C., Ramalho, R., & Shleifer, A. (2010). The effect of corporate taxes on investment and entrepreneurship. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(3), 31–64.Google Scholar
- Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., & Krizan, C. J. (1998). Aggregate productivity growth: Lessons from microeconomic evidence. NBER WP 6803.Google Scholar
- García-Posada, M., & Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. (2015). Does (average) size matter? Court enforcement, business demography and firm growth. Small Business Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2011). Informe GEM España 2011. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.Google Scholar
- Ippoliti, R., Melcarne, A., & Ramello, G. B. (2014). Judicial efficiency and entrepreneurs’ expectations on the reliability of European legal systems. European Journal of Law and Economics. doi: 10.1007/s10657-014-9456-x.
- Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2004). Business environment and firm entry: Evidence from international data. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3232.Google Scholar
- Lichand, G., & Soares, R. R. (2014). Access to justice and entrepreneurship: Evidence from Brazil’s special civil tribunals. Journal of Law and Economics, 57(2), 459–499.Google Scholar
- López-García, P., & Puente, S. (2006). Business demography in Spain: Determinants of firm survival. Working Paper 0608 Banco de España.Google Scholar
- López-García, P., & Puente, S. (2007). A comparison of the determinants of survival of Spanish firms across economic sectors. In J. M. Arauzo-Carod & M. C. Manjon-Antolin (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, industrial location and economic growth (pp. 161–183). Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.Google Scholar
- Matea, M. Ll., & Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. (2012). El comercio minorista después de una década de regulación autonómica: efectos en la densidad comercial, el empleo y la inflación. Revista de Economía Aplicada XX, 59, 5–54.Google Scholar
- Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. (2010). A characterization of the judicial system in Spain: Analysis with formalism indices. Economic Analysis of Law Review, 1(2), 210–240.Google Scholar
- Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. (2012). Is judicial inefficacy increasing the weight of the house property market in Spain? Evidence at the local level. SERIEs, Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, 3(3), 339–365.Google Scholar
- Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S., & Fuentes, A. (2012). An analysis of productivity performance in Spain before and during the crisis: Exploring the role of institutions. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 973. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Nijsen, & Vellinga. (2002). A model to measure the administrative burden of businesses. Scientific Analysis of Enterprises and SMEs Research Report 0110.Google Scholar
- Palumbo, G., Giupponi, G., Nunziata, L., & Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. (2013). “The economics of civil justice: new cross-country data and empirics”. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1060.Google Scholar
- Ponticelli, J. (2013). Court enforcement and firm productivity: Evidence from a Bankruptcy reform in Brazil. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2179022.
- Scarpetta, S., Hemmings, P., Tressel, T., & Woo, J. (2002). The role of policy and institutions for productivity and firm dynamics: Evidence from micro and industry data. Economic Department Working Papers, no. 329, OCDE.Google Scholar