European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 49–74 | Cite as

Entrepreneurship and enforcement institutions: disaggregated evidence for Spain

  • Miguel García-Posada
  • Juan S. Mora-SanguinettiEmail author


Entry of new firms, both in the form of entrepreneurs or corporations, fosters competition and productivity. Both the entry of firms and productivity have been low in the Spanish economy over the recent years. This paper analyzes the determinants of entry focusing on the role of the design and efficacy of enforcement institutions (the judicial system), a traditionally overlooked aspect. In order to do so, we examine disaggregated data at the local level in Spain. We find that higher judicial efficacy increases the entry rate of firms, while it has no effect on the exit rate. Crucially, that impact only occurs in the case of the entry rates of entrepreneurs, defined as self-employed, but not in the case of limited liability corporations. This finding may be explained by the fact that judicial (in)efficacy can be regarded as a fixed cost to be paid by agents that litigate. Hence, the economic activity of entrepreneurs -and specifically, their entry into the market- is expected to be more affected than that of larger firms.


Entrepreneurship Judicial efficacy Barriers to entry 

JEL Classification

L26 M13 K40 R12 



We are grateful to participants in the Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum (Stockholm), the XXXVIII Simposio of the Spanish Economic Association (Santander), the Economic Analysis of Litigation Workshop (Catania), the research seminar of the Banco de España and the CFCM seminar at the University of Nottingham. We wish to thank Pontus Braunerhjelm, Johan Eklund, Javier J. Perez, Giovanni B. Ramello, Margarita Rubio, José Carrasco, Claire McHugh, Rocío Prieto and to two anonymous referees for their useful comments and suggestions. We thank as well Ildefonso Villan Criado (CGPJ) for his advice in the use of the judicial performance data and Marcos Marchetti for excellent research assistance. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Banco de España or the Eurosystem.


  1. Aghion, P., Fally, T., & Scarpetta, S. (2007). Credit constraints as a barrier to the entry and post-entry growth of firms. Economic Policy, 22, 731–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardagna, S., & Lusardi, A. (2010). The international differences in entrepreneurship. In J. Lerner & A. Schoar (Eds.), Explaining international differences in entrepreneurship: The role of individual characteristics and regulatory constraints. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armour, J., & Cumming, D. (2008). Bankruptcy law and entrepreneurship. American Law and Economics Review, V10(2), 303–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audretsch, D. B. (2002). Entrepreneurship: A survey of the literature: Report prepared for European Commission. Brussels: Enterprise Directorate General. Brussels European Commission.Google Scholar
  5. Baliamoune-Lutz, M., & Garello, P. (2014). Tax structure and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 42, 165–190.Google Scholar
  6. Berkowitz, J., & White, M. (2004). Bankruptcy and small firms’ access to credit. Rand Journal of Economics, 35(1), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Botero, J. C., Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2004). The regulation of labor. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(4), 1339–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandt, N. (2004). Business dynamics in Europe. OECD Science, Technology and Industry. Working Papers, 2004/1, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Branstetter, L., Lima, F., Taylor, L. J., & Venâncio, A. (2014). Do entry regulations deter entrepreneurship and job creation? Evidence from recent reforms in Portugal. The Economic Journal, 124(577), 805–832.Google Scholar
  10. Carmignani A., & Giacomelli, S. (2010). Too many Lawyers? Litigation in Italian civil courts. Temi di Discussione 745, Banca d’Italia.Google Scholar
  11. Chemin, M. (2009). The impact of the judiciary on entrepreneurship: Evaluation of Pakistan’s access to justice programme. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1–2), 114–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ciccone, A., & Papaioannou, E. (2007). Red tape and delayed entry. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5, 444–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Círculo de Empresarios (2003). Justicia, economía y empresa. Spain: Madrid.Google Scholar
  14. Commission, European. (2012). Effects and impact of entrepreneurship programmes in higher education. Brussels: European Union.Google Scholar
  15. Cullen, J. B., & Gordon, R. H. (2007). Taxes and entrepreneurial risk-taking: Theory and evidence for the U.S. Journal of Public Economics, 91(7–8), 1479–1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Desai, M., Gompers, P., & Lerner. J (2005). Institutions, capital constraints and entrepreneurial firm dynamics: Evidence from Europe, Harvard NOM Working Paper No. 03-59.Google Scholar
  17. Djankov, S., Ganser, T., McLiesh, C., Ramalho, R., & Shleifer, A. (2010). The effect of corporate taxes on investment and entrepreneurship. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(3), 31–64.Google Scholar
  18. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., López de Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation on entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., López de Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Courts. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 453–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans, D. S., & Jovanovic, B. (1989). An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 808–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fabbri, D. (2010). Law enforcement and firm financing: Theory and evidence. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(4), 776–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fan, W., & White, M. (2003). Personal bankruptcy and the level of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Law and Economics, 46(2), 543–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fariñas, J. C., & Ruano, S. (2004). The dynamics of productivity: A decomposition approach using distribution functions. Small Business Economics, 22, 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., & Krizan, C. J. (1998). Aggregate productivity growth: Lessons from microeconomic evidence. NBER WP 6803.Google Scholar
  25. García-Posada, M., & Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. (2015). Does (average) size matter? Court enforcement, business demography and firm growth. Small Business Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  26. Glenn Hubbard, R., & Gentry, W. M. (2000). Tax policy and entrepreneurial entry. American Economic Review, 90(2), 283–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2011). Informe GEM España 2011. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.Google Scholar
  28. Huergo, E., & Jaumandreu, J. (2004). How does probability of process innovation change with firm age? Small Business Economics, 22, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ippoliti, R., Melcarne, A., & Ramello, G. B. (2014). Judicial efficiency and entrepreneurs’ expectations on the reliability of European legal systems. European Journal of Law and Economics. doi: 10.1007/s10657-014-9456-x.
  30. Jappelli, T., Pagano, M., & Bianco, M. (2005). Courts and banks: Effects of judicial enforcement on credit markets. Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 37, 224–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, S., McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (2002). Courts and relational contracts. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 18, 221–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2004). Business environment and firm entry: Evidence from international data. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3232.Google Scholar
  33. Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 591–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. La Porta, R., López de Silanes, F., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52, 1131–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. La Porta, R., López De Silanes, F., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lichand, G., & Soares, R. R. (2014). Access to justice and entrepreneurship: Evidence from Brazil’s special civil tribunals. Journal of Law and Economics, 57(2), 459–499.Google Scholar
  37. López-García, P., & Puente, S. (2006). Business demography in Spain: Determinants of firm survival. Working Paper 0608 Banco de España.Google Scholar
  38. López-García, P., & Puente, S. (2007). A comparison of the determinants of survival of Spanish firms across economic sectors. In J. M. Arauzo-Carod & M. C. Manjon-Antolin (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, industrial location and economic growth (pp. 161–183). Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.Google Scholar
  39. Martin-Marcos, A., & Jaumandreu, J. (2004). Entry, exit and productivity growth in Spanish manufacturing during the eighties. Spanish Economic Review, 6(3), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matea, M. Ll., & Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. (2012). El comercio minorista después de una década de regulación autonómica: efectos en la densidad comercial, el empleo y la inflación. Revista de Economía Aplicada XX, 59, 5–54.Google Scholar
  41. Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. (2010). A characterization of the judicial system in Spain: Analysis with formalism indices. Economic Analysis of Law Review, 1(2), 210–240.Google Scholar
  42. Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. (2012). Is judicial inefficacy increasing the weight of the house property market in Spain? Evidence at the local level. SERIEs, Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, 3(3), 339–365.Google Scholar
  43. Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S., & Fuentes, A. (2012). An analysis of productivity performance in Spain before and during the crisis: Exploring the role of institutions. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 973. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Nijsen, & Vellinga. (2002). A model to measure the administrative burden of businesses. Scientific Analysis of Enterprises and SMEs Research Report 0110.Google Scholar
  45. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. OECD. (2001). Business views’ on red tape: Administrative burdens on small and medium sized enterprises. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Palumbo, G., Giupponi, G., Nunziata, L., & Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S. (2013). “The economics of civil justice: new cross-country data and empirics”. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1060.Google Scholar
  48. Ponticelli, J. (2013). Court enforcement and firm productivity: Evidence from a Bankruptcy reform in Brazil. Available at SSRN:
  49. Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, L(5), 1421–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Samila, S., & Sorenson, O. (2011). Venture capital, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 338–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scarpetta, S., Hemmings, P., Tressel, T., & Woo, J. (2002). The role of policy and institutions for productivity and firm dynamics: Evidence from micro and industry data. Economic Department Working Papers, no. 329, OCDE.Google Scholar
  52. Stephen, F., Urbano, D., & van Hemmen, S. (2009). The responsiveness of entrepreneurs to working time regulations. Small Business Economics, 32(3), 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Stel, A., Storey, D., & Thurik, A. (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28(2), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel García-Posada
    • 1
    • 2
  • Juan S. Mora-Sanguinetti
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Banco de España- EurosystemMadridSpain
  2. 2.Universidad Carlos III de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations