European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 37–56 | Cite as

The determinants of recidivism among ex-prisoners: a survival analysis on French data

  • Benjamin Monnery


This article explores the main determinants of the hazard of recidivism among ex-prisoners. We use a nationally-representative sample of prisoners released in 1996–1997 in France, drawn from a 5-year follow-up survey run by the French correctional administration. We estimate semi-parametric duration models which deal with violations of the proportional hazards assumption. Our results confirm the importance of gender, age, nationality, employment status and prior convictions on recidivism within 5 years after release from prison. We also find significant differences in hazards of recidivism by type of initial offense, penal status at entry, and type of release (early release under parole, etc.), while controlling for prison fixed effects. Finally, our study casts doubt on the influence of several sociodemographic variables (marital status at entry, education, homelessness) and on the effectiveness of semi-liberté as a way to prevent recidivism.


Economics of crime Recidivism Duration models 

JEL Classification

C41 K42 



The dataset was obtained from the French correctional administration (DAP) and the Ministry of Justice and Freedoms. I am deeply grateful to Annie Kensey from the DAP for her precious help in obtaining the data. I also thank my supervisor Jean-Yves Lesueur for his support and his comments during this research project. All opinions and remaining errors are my own.

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.


  1. Amirault, J., & Lussier, P. (2011). Population heterogeneity, state dependence and sexual offender recidivism: The aging process and the lost predictive impact of prior criminal charges over time. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 344–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlow, H., & Kauzlarich, D. (2010). Explaining crime: A primer in criminological theory., G-reference, information and interdisciplinary subjects series Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Bayer, P., Hjalmarsson, R., & Pozen, D. (2009). Building criminal capital behind bars: Peer effects in juvenile corrections. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 105–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernburg, J. G., Krohn, M. D., & Rivera, C. J. (2006). Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency: A longitudinal test of labeling theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(1), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bierens, H. J., & Carvalho, J. R. (2002). A competing risk analysis of recidivism. Working paper.Google Scholar
  7. Bierie, D. (2009). Cost matters: A randomized experiment comparing recidivism between two styles of prisons. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5, 371–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowles, R. A., & Florackis, C. (2007). Duration of the time to reconviction: Evidence from UK prisoner discharge data. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35(4), 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Jones, B. S. (2004). Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, M. K., & Shapiro, J. M. (2007). Do harsher prison conditions reduce recidivism? A discontinuity-based approach. American Law and Economics Review, 9(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeAngelo, G., & Charness, G. (2012). Deterrence, expected cost, uncertainty and voting: Experimental evidence. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 44, 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di Tella, R., & Schargrodsky, E. (2013). Criminal recidivism after prison and electronic monitoring. Journal of Political Economy, 121(1), 28–73.Google Scholar
  13. Drago, F., & Galbiati, R. (2012). Indirect effects of a policy altering criminal behavior: Evidence from the Italian prison experiment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(2), 199–218.Google Scholar
  14. Drago, F., Galbiati, R., & Vertova, P. (2009). The deterrent effects of prison: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Political Economy, 117(2), 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drago, F., Galbiati, R., & Vertova, P. (2011). Prison conditions and recidivism. American Law and Economics Review, 13(1), 103–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duwe, G., & Clark, V. (2013). Blessed be the social tie that binds: The effects of prison visitation on offender recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(3), 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Escarela, G., Francis, B., & Soothill, K. (2000). Competing risks, persistence and desistance in analyzing recidivism. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(4), 385–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farrington, D. P. (2003). British randomized experiments on crime and justice. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589(1), 150–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Folkard, M. S., Smith, D. E., & Smith, D. D. (1976). Impact: Volume 2, the results of the experiment. Technical report, Home Office Research Study n 36.Google Scholar
  20. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Campus: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kensey, A., & Benaouda, A. (2011). Les risques de récidive des sortants de prison. une nouvelle évaluation. Cahiers d’études pénitentiaires et criminologiques, 36, 1–8.Google Scholar
  22. Kensey, A., & Tournier, P.-V. (2002). Arithmétique de l’exécution des peines. DAP-PMJ1: Travaux et Documents, 60, 147.Google Scholar
  23. Kensey, A., & Tournier, P.-V. (2005). Prisonniers du passé ? cohorte des personnes condamnées, libérées en 1996–1997: examen de leur casier judiciaire 5 ans après la levée d’écrou (échantillon national aléatoire stratifié selon l’infraction). Direction de l’Administration Pénitentiaire, Travaux et Documents, 68, 63.Google Scholar
  24. Kim, J. I., Benson, B. L., Rasmussen, D. W., & Zuehlke, T. W. (1993). An economic analysis of recidivism among drug offenders. Southern Economic Journal, 60(1), 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kubrin, C. E., & Stewart, E. A. (2006). Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology, 44(1), 165–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Technical report, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  27. Manski, C. F. (2000). Economic analysis of social interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maurin, E., & Ouss, A. (2009). Sentence reductions and recidivism: Lessons from the Bastille Day quasi experiment. IZA Discussion Papers 3990, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  29. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Desistance from crime over the life course. In J. Mortimer & M. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course, handbooks of sociology and social research (pp. 295–309). US: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmidt, P., & Witte, A. D. (1989). Predicting criminal recidivism using ’split population’ survival time models. Journal of Econometrics, 40(1), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Skardhamar, T., & Telle, K. (2009). Life after prison: The relationship between employment and re-incarceration. Discussion Papers 597, Research Department of Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
  32. Svensson, R., Weerman, F. M., Pauwels, L. J., Bruinsma, G. J., & Bernasco, W. (2013). Moral emotions and offending: Do feelings of anticipated shame and guilt mediate the effect of socialization on offending? European Journal of Criminology, 10(1), 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Uggen, C. (2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review, 65(4), 529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Winden, F., & Ash, E. (2012). On the behavioral economics of crime. Review of Law and Economics, 8(1), 181–213.Google Scholar
  35. Zamble, E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1997). The criminal recidivism process., Cambridge Criminology Series Cambridge, England and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université de LyonLyonFrance
  2. 2.CNRSGATE Lyon Saint-EtienneEcully CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations