European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 577–601 | Cite as

Providing credibility around the world: effective devices of the Cape Town Convention

  • Yoshinobu Zasu
  • Ikumi Sato


This paper analyzes the characteristics and effects of the Cape Town Convention, which provides legal protection for investors in relation to asset-based aircraft financing. Some countries lack credibility for investors, who believe that the protection level of creditor rights in the country differs before and after investment. This time inconsistency problem results in credit rationing. Airlines in such countries cannot access the credit market, particularly the international capital market. This paper first examines why developing countries have been suffering from a lack of credibility and from credit rationing, and then explores how the Convention resolves this problem. We focus on two devices: the white list system and the system of declarations. The former gives the contracting states incentive not to break the Convention. The latter is considered to promote the ratification of the Convention by potential contracting states. These devices enable the Convention to attract a number of states.


Uniform commercial law Law and finance Time inconsistency problem 

JEL Classification

K10 K33 G38 



The authors appreciate the valuable comments and suggestions of an anonymous referee, Hideo Murase, participants in the 2008 annual meetings of the Asian Law and Economics Association and the Japanese Law and Economics Association, and seminar participants at the Nagoya University and Province University. Moreover, the authors are grateful for the research support provided by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.


  1. Bebchuk, L. A., & Guzman, A. T. (1999). An economic analysis of transnational bankruptcies. Journal of Law and Economics, 42, 775–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkowitz, D., Pistor, K., & Richard, J.-F. (2003a). The transplant effect. American Journal of Comparative Law, 51, 163–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkowitz, D., Pistor, K., & Richard, J.-F. (2003b). Economic development, legality, and the transplant effect. European Economic Review, 47, 165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouma, R. (1998). Financing national airlines in developing countries. In: Littlejohns, A., McGairl, S. (Eds.), Aircraft financing (3rd ed.) (pp. 214–220). London: Euromoney Books.Google Scholar
  5. Cuming, R. (2002). The characterisation of interests and transactions under the convention of international interests in mobile equipment, 2001. In: Davies, I. (Ed.), Security interests in mobile equipment (pp. 377–395). Dartmouth: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Desai, M. A., Foley, C. F., & Hines, J. R. (2004) A multinational perspective on capital structure choice and internal capital markets. Journal of Finance, 59(6), 2451–2485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fon, V., & Parisi, F. (2007). On the optimal specificity of legal rules. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3(2), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goode, R. (2008). Official commentary on the convention on international interests in mobile equipment and the protocol thereto on matters specific to aircraft equipment (revised ed.). Rome: Unidroit.Google Scholar
  9. Goldsmith, J. L., & Posner, E. A. (2005). The limits of international law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Guzman, A. T. (2008). How international law works: A rational choice theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jappelli, T., Pagano, M., & Bianco, M. (2003). Courts and banks: Effects of judicial enforcement on credit markets. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 37(2), 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Visny R. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52, 1131–1149.Google Scholar
  13. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Visny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Littlejohns, A. (1998). Legal issues in aircraft finance. In: Littlejohns, A., & McGairl, S. (Eds.), Aircraft financing (3rd ed.) (pp. 281–302). London: Euromoney Books.Google Scholar
  16. Maule, D. (1998). Aircraft repossession insurance. In: Littlejohns, A., McGairl, S. (Eds.), Aircraft financing (3rd ed.) (pp. 328–334). London: Euromoney Books.Google Scholar
  17. OECD. (2011). Sector understanding on export credits for civil aircraft. TAD/PG(2011)3.Google Scholar
  18. Pistor, K. (2002). The standardization of law and its effect of developing economies. American Journal of Comparative Law, 50, 97–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rubins, N., & Kinsella, N. S. (2005). International investment, political risk and dispute resolution: A practitioner’s guide. London: Occeana Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Sato, I., & Zasu, Y. (2010). Beyond conflict of interest: Lessons from the Cape Town convention. Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 1(1), article 1. Available at:
  21. Saunders, A., Srinivasan, A., & Walter, I. (2006). Innovation in international law and global finance: Estimating the financial impact of the Cape Town convention. Available at:
  22. Saunders, A., Srinivasan, A., Walter, I., & Wool, J. (1999). The economic implications of international secured transactions law reform: A case study. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 20(2), 309–352.Google Scholar
  23. Sykes, A. O. (2004). International law. In: Polinsky, A. M., & Shavell, S. (Eds.), Handbook of law and economics, vol.1, pp. 757–826.Google Scholar
  24. Tirole, J. (2003). Inefficient foreign borrowing: A dual- and common-agency perspective. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1678–1702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tirole, J. (2006). The theory of corporate finance. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Unidroit. (1996). Study group for the preparation of uniform rules on international interests in mobile equipment: Second memorandum prepared jointly by Airbus Industrie and the Boeing Company on behalf of an aviation working group. Study LXXII-Doc. 23.Google Scholar
  27. Wool, J. (1997). Rethinking the notion of uniformity in the drafting of international commercial law: A preliminary proposal for the development of a policy-based unification model. Uniform Law Review, 1997(1), 46–56.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsKansai UniversitySuita-ShiJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of LawKobe UniversityHyogoJapan

Personalised recommendations