Advertisement

European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 533–560 | Cite as

The uneasy case for rehabilitating small firms under the 1997-reorganization law in Belgium: evidence from reorganization plans

  • Bart Leyman
Article

Abstract

Using a sample of small Belgian firms that reorganized under the 1997 Law on Judicial Composition, I empirically review the law’s effectiveness to rehabilitate distressed debtors. The econometric findings show that firms with less pre-bankruptcy operational losses and a better cash position are more likely to successfully execute their reorganization plan and that certain debt restructuring measures can contribute to firm rescue. Despite these positive findings, many firms still failed to reorganise under the 1997-reorganization law, which resulted in constant criticism on its effectiveness leading up to its recent replacement in 2009. My data also shows that within the former reorganization procedure the Belgian debtor was faced with high debt instalment payments compared to international practice and that successful plan execution relied too much on the uncertain realization of the operational cash flow projections. In discussing the legal framework of the new Law on Corporate Continuity enacted in 2009—replacing the 1997-law—I argue that this new law is a more effective legislation to save distressed businesses.

Keywords

Court-supervised reorganization Bankruptcy Insolvency regulation Reorganization plan 

JEL Classification

K20 K22 G33 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is a reworked and updated version of the first chapter of my doctoral dissertation on creditor behaviour in distressed companies. This first chapter was originally entitled “the reorganization practice of small firms under Belgian court-supervised reorganization”. I appreciate helpful comments and suggestions from Peter Coussement, Abe de Jong, Sophie Manigart, Koen Schoors, Armin Schwienbacher, Michel Tison and Cynthia Van Hulle. I also wish to thank Anne Meeussen for the language revisions. The financial support of the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Altman, E. I. (1984). A further empirical investigation of the bankruptcy cost question. Journal of Finance, 39(4), 1067–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baird, D. G., Bris, A., & Zhu, N. (2007). The dynamics of large and small chapter 11 cases: An empirical study. Yale ICF Working Paper No. 05-29.Google Scholar
  3. Baird, D. G., & Morrison, E. R. (2001). Bankruptcy decision making. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 17(2), 356–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bris, A., Welch, I., & Zhu, N. (2006). The costs of bankruptcy: Chapter 7 liquidation versus Chapter 11 reorganization. Journal of Finance, 61(3), 1253–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Couwenberg, O., & de Jong, A. (2008). Costs and recovery rates in the Dutch liquidation-based bankruptcy system. European Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davydenko, S., & Franks, J. (2008). Do bankruptcy codes matter? A study of defaults in France, Germany and the UK. Journal of Finance, 63(2), 565–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewaelheyns, N., & Van Hulle, C. (2009). Filtering speed in a continental European reorganization procedure. International Review of Law and Economics, 29(4), 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dewaelheyns, N., & Van Hulle, C. (2010). Bankruptcy reform: Evidence from a survey among judges and receivers. Applied Economics Letters, 17(14), 1367–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eisenberg, T., & Tagashira, S. (1994). Should we abolish Chapter 11? The evidence from Japan. Journal of Legal Studies, 23(1), 111–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher, T. C. G., & Martel, J. (1994). Will the bankruptcy reform work? An empirical analysis of financial reorganization in Canada. Canadian Public Policy, 20(3), 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher, T. C. G., & Martel, J. (1995). The creditor’s financial reorganization decision: New evidence form Canadian data. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 11(1), 112–126.Google Scholar
  12. Fisher, T. C. G., & Martel, J. (1999). Should we abolish Chapter 11? Evidence from Canada. Journal of Legal Studies, 28(1), 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher, T. C. G., & Martel, J. (2004). Empirical estimates of filtering failure in Court-supervised reorganization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1(1), 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franks, J. R., & Sussman, O. (2005). Financial distress and bank restructuring of small to medium size UK companies. The Review of Finance, 9(1), 65–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Franks, J. R., & Torous, W. N. (1989). An empirical investigation of U.S. firms in reorganization. Journal of Finance, 44(3), 747–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hotchkiss, E. S. (1995). Post bankruptcy performance and management turnover. Journal of Finance, 50(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jensen-Conklin, S. (1992). Do confirmed Chapter 11 plans consummate? The results of a study and analysis of the law. Commercial Law Journal, 97(3), 297–331.Google Scholar
  18. Kahl, M. (2001). Financial distress as a selection mechanism: Evidence from the United States. Anderson School, Finance Working Paper No. 16-01. Google Scholar
  19. Kahl, M. (2002). Economic distress, financial distress, and dynamic liquidation. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 135–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leland, H. E., & Pyle, D. H. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. LoPucki, L., & Doherty, J. (2004). The determinants of professional fees in large bankruptcy reorganization cases. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1(1), 111–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morgan, B. K. (2000). Should the sovereign be paid first? A comparative analysis of the priority for tax claims in bankruptcy. The American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 74, 461–508.Google Scholar
  23. Morrison, E. R. (2007). Bankruptcy decision making: an empirical study of continuation bias in Chapter 11. Journal of Law and Economics, 50(2), 381–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sandeep, D., Kose, J., Manju, P., & Gabriel, R. (2003). Debtor-in-Possession financing and bankruptcy resolution: Empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1), 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sundgren, S. (1998). Does a reorganization law improve the efficiency of the insolvency law? The Finnish experience. European Journal of Law and Economics, 6(2), 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1999). Financial characteristics of businesses in bankruptcy. The American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 73, 499–589.Google Scholar
  27. Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (2007). Chapter 11: Conventional wisdom and reality. University of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 125. Google Scholar
  28. Weiss, L. (1990). Bankruptcy resolution: Direct costs and violation of priority claims. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weiss, L., & Wruck, K. (1998). Information problems, conflicts of interest and asset stripping: Chapter 11’s failure in the case of Eastern Airlines. Journal of Financial Economics, 48(1), 55–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. White, M. J. (1994). Corporate bankruptcy as a filtering device: Chapter 11 reorganizations and out-of-court debt restructurings. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 10(2), 268–295.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations