Quantifying the dose-response of walking in reducing coronary heart disease risk: meta-analysis
The evidence for the efficacy of walking in reducing the risk of and preventing coronary heart disease (CHD) is not completely understood. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the dose-response relationship between walking and CHD risk reduction for both men and women in the general population. Studies on walking and CHD primary prevention between 1954 and 2007 were identified through Medline, SportDiscus and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Random-effect meta-regression models were used to pool the relative risks from individual studies. A total of 11 prospective cohort studies and one randomized control trial study met the inclusion criteria, with 295,177 participants free of CHD at baseline and 7,094 cases at follow-up. The meta-analysis indicated that an increment of approximately 30 min of normal walking a day for 5 days a week was associated with 19% CHD risk reduction (95% CI = 14–23%; P-heterogeneity = 0.56; I 2 = 0%). We found no evidence of heterogeneity between subgroups of studies defined by gender (P = 0.67); age of the study population (P = 0.52); or follow-up duration (P = 0.77). The meta-analysis showed that the risk for developing CHD decreases as walking dose increases. Walking should be prescribed as an evidence-based effective exercise modality for CHD prevention in the general population.
KeywordsCoronary heart disease Exercise Meta-analysis Physical activity Walking
The authors wish to acknowledge the valuable comments by two anonymous reviewers.
- 1.World Health Organisation. Cardiovascular diseases. [Online] Geneva: WHO; 2002 [updated 2002; cited 12 January, 2008]; Available from: http://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/resources/atlas/en/index.html.
- 2.World Health Organisation. World health report 2002: reducing risk, promoting healthy life. Geneva: WHO; 2002.Google Scholar
- 5.US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity and health: a report of the surgeon general. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996.Google Scholar
- 11.Egger G, Champion N, Bolton A. The fitness leader’s handbook. 4th ed. Sydney: Kangaroo Press; 1998.Google Scholar
- 12.Australian Bureau of Statistics. Physical activity in Australia: a snapshot, 2004–05 Canberra; 2006 [updated 2006; cited 2008 January 12]; Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4835.0.55.001.
- 14.The National Travel Survey. Walking in Great Britain 1996 [updated 1996; cited 2007 December 12]; Available from: http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/statistics/datatablespublications/personal/articles/walkingreatbritain1?version=1.
- 35.Orsini N, Bellocco R, Greenland S. Generalized least squares for trend estimation of summarized dose-response data. Stata J. 2006;6:40–57.Google Scholar
- 39.Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context London. UK: The BMJ Publishing Group; 2001.Google Scholar