European Journal of Epidemiology

, Volume 20, Issue 11, pp 939–946 | Cite as

A Population-based Case–control Study of Isolated Anophthalmia and Microphthalmia

  • Gábor Vogt
  • Erzsébet Puhó
  • Andrew E. Czeizel
Ophthalmological Diseases


The purpose of the study was to reveal the etiological factors in the origin of isolated an/microphthalmia. The dataset of the Hungarian Case–Control Surveillance of Congenital Abnormalities, 1980–2002 containing 56 cases with isolated an/microphthalmia and 22,744 malformed controls with other non-ocular defects from the Hungarian Congenital Abnormality Registry, in addition of 56 matched control pairs and 37,837 population controls without defects from the National Birth Registry, was evaluated. Exposure data and family history were collected (i) prospectively by prenatal logbook and other medical records, (ii) retrospectively through a structured questionnaire filled-in by mothers, and (iii) information obtained by regional nurses at home visit of non-respondent mothers. The autosomal recessive origin of isolated an/microphthalmia was indicated in about 10% of cases on the basis of sib recurrence. Cases with isolated an/microphthalmia had a much shorter mean gestational age and smaller mean birth weight, a much larger proportion of preterm birth and low birthweight. Their mothers were younger with a predominance of first birth order, frequently unmarried with low socioeconomic status. These findings are in agreement with a much higher prevalence at birth of cases with isolated an/microphthalmia in the gypsy population probably due to the interaction of inbreeding effect and low socioeconomic status. Further molecular genetic studies are needed to identify gene mutations of isolated an/microphthalmia in the Hungarian gypsy population.


anophthalmia case–control study gypsy population microphthalmia 



congenital abnormalities


Hungarian Congenital Abnormality Registry


Hungarian Case–Control Surveillance of Congenital Abnormalities


isolated anophthalmos-microphthalmos


socioeconomic status


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gilbert, C, Foster, A 2001Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020 – the right to sightBull World Health Organ79227232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Czeizel, AE, Rockenbauer, M, Siffel, CS, Varga, E 2001Description and mission evaluation of the Hungarian Case-Control Surveillance of Congenital Abnormalities, 1980–1996Teratology63176185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Czeizel, AE 1997First 25 years of the Hungarian Congenital Abnormality RegistryTeratology56299305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Czeizel, AE, Petik, D, Vargha, P 2003Validation studies of drug exposures in pregnant womenPharmacoepidemiol Drug Safety12409–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duke-Elder, S. 1964System of Ophthalmology. Congenital DeformitiesHenry KimptonLondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cross, H, Yoder, F 1976Familial nanophthalmosAm J Ophthalmol56454458Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fujiki, K, Nakajima, A, Yasuda, N,  et al. 1982Genetic analysis of microphthalmosOphthal Paediat Genet1139149Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guyer, D, Green, W 1984Bilateral extreme microphthalmosOpththal Pediatr Genet48190Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cennamo, G, Magli, A, Corvino, D 1985Genetic and ultrasound study of hereditary pure microphthalmosOphthal Pediatr Genet63742Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martorina, J 1988Nanophthalmic familialeJ Fr Ophthalmol11357361Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stoll, C, Alembik, Y, Dott, B, Roth, MP 1992Epidemiology of congenital eye malformations in 131,760 consecutive birthsOphthal Pediatr Genet13179186Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morrison, D, Fitzpatrick, D, Hanson, I,  et al. 2002National study of microphthalmia, anophthalmia and coloboma (MAC) in Scotland: Investigation of genetic aetiologyJ Med Genet391622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vingolo Steidl, E. K, Forte, R,  et al. 1994Autosomal dominant simple microphthalmosJ Med Genet31721725Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Griepentrog, GJ, Lucarelli, MJ 2004Heritable unilateral anophthalmiaOphthal Plast Reconstr Surg20166168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Källen, B, Robert, E, Harris, J 1996The descriptive epidemiology of anophthalmia and microphthalmiaInt J Epidemiol2510091016PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Källen, B, Tornquist, K 2005The epidemiology of anophthalmia and microphthalmia in SwedenEur J Epidemiol20 345350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Czeizel, AE, Bodnar, L, Illei, G, Molnár, A 1976The occurrence of consanguineous marriages in HungaryHum Hered26110112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Assal, S, Susánszky, E, Czeizel, AE 1991High consanguinity rate in Hungarian gypsy populationActa Pediatr Hung31299304Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gencikova, S, Gencik, A 1982Congenital glaucoma in gypsies from SlovakiaHum Hered32270273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Plasilova, M, Stoilov, I, Sarfarazi, M,  et al. 1999Identification of a single ancestral CYP1B1 mutation in Slovak gypsies (Roms) affected with primary congenital glaucomaJ Med Genet36290294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rahi, JS, Dezateux, C 1999National cross sectional study of detection of congenital and infantile cataract in the United Kingdom: a role of childhood screening and surveillanceBr Med J318362365Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rahi, JS, Botting, B 2001British Congenital Cataract Interest Group. Ascertainment of children with congenital cataract through the National Congenital Anomaly System in England and WalesBr J Ophthalmol8510491051PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Black, GCM 2002Genetics for OphthalmologistsRemedicaLondonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vogt G, Puhó E, Czeizel AE. A population-based case–control study of isolated congenital cataract. Birth Defects Res Part A 2005. (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gábor Vogt
    • 1
  • Erzsébet Puhó
    • 2
    • 3
  • Andrew E. Czeizel
    • 2
  1. 1.Hospital and Central Outpatients Clinics of the Hungarian State RailwaysBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Foundation for the Community Control of Hereditary DiseasesBudapestHungary
  3. 3.Department of Human Genetics and TeratologyNational Center for EpidemiologyBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations