Abiotic subsurface behaviors of As(V) with Fe(II)
- 203 Downloads
Subsurface geochemical behavior of As(V) with Fe(II) was studied under strict anoxic conditions. Abiotic reduction of As(V) (0.1 mM) to As(III) by aqueous Fe(II) and sorbed Fe(II) in pH range 5.0–7.0 and Fe(II)aq concentration (0.6–1.2 mM) was investigated along with the effect of As(V) on the oxidation of Fe(II) by dissolved oxygen (DO). Although the reduction was thermodynamically feasible for homogeneous chemical conditions, practically no As(V) reduction by aqueous Fe(II) was observed. Similarly, no sorbed As(V) reduction was observed under the heterogeneous experimental conditions by sorbed Fe(II) onto synthetic iron oxide (hematite, α-Fe2O3). Experimental results on Fe(II) oxidation by DO in the presence of 0.1 mM As(V) showed a significantly slower Fe(II) oxidation, which might be due to the formation of Fe(II)–As(V) complex in the aqueous phase. The results of this study demonstrate that As(V) is relatively stable in the presence of Fe(II) under subsurface environment and interfere the oxidation of Fe(II).
KeywordsGroundwater Ferrous Arsenate Abiotic reduction
This research was supported by Korea Mine Reclamation Corporation, 21st Frontier research project (Sustainable Water Resources Research Center 3-4-3), Korea Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korean Government (KRF-D0028), and Global Research Laboratory project (Korea Institute of Geosciences and Mineral Resources NP2008-019).
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (2007). Toxicological profile for Arsenic. U.S. Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp2.pdf.
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (2009). Case studies in environmental medicine. Arsenic toxicity. U.S. Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Altanta, GA. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/arsenic/docs/arsenic.pdf.
- Ahn, J. S., Ko, K. S., Lee, J. S., & Kim, J. Y. (2005). Characteristics of natural Arsenic contamination in groundwater and its occurrences. Economic and Environmental Geology, 38(5), 547–561.Google Scholar
- Bang, S. B., Choe, E. Y., & Kim, K. Y. (2005). Treatment technologies for Arsenic removal from groundwater: Review paper. Economic and Environmental Geology, 38(5), 599–606.Google Scholar
- Chakraborti, D., Samanta, G., Mandal, B. K., Chowdhury, T. R., Chanda, C. R., Biswas, B. K., et al. (1998). Calcutta’s industrial pollution: Groundwater arsenic contamination in a residential area and suffering of people due to industrial effluent discharge—an eight-year study report. Current Science, 74(4), 346–355.Google Scholar
- Dhar, R. K., Biswas, B. K., Samanta, G., & Mandel, B. (1997). Groundwater Arsenic calamity in Bangladesh. Current Science, 73(1), 48–59.Google Scholar
- Meng, X. G., & Wang, W. (1998). Speciation of arsenic by disposable cartridges. In Book of posters of the third international conference on arsenic exposure and health effects. Society of Environmental Geochemistry and Health, University of Colorado at Denver, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
- Pourbaix, M. (1966). Atlas of electrochemical equilibria. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
- Stumm, W., & Morgan, J. J. (1996). Aquatic chemistry (3rd edn ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Yi, J. S., Lee, J. M., & Chon, H. T. (2003). Chemical speciation of Arsenic in the water system from some abandoned Au-Ag mines in Korea. Economic and Environmental Geology, 36(6), 481–490.Google Scholar