Environmental Geochemistry and Health

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 93–102 | Cite as

Assessment of bioaccessibility and exposure risk of arsenic and lead in urban soils of Guangzhou City, China

  • Ying Lu
  • Wei Yin
  • Longbin Huang
  • Ganlin Zhang
  • Yuguo Zhao
Original Paper


Soil ingestion is an important human exposure pathway of heavy metals in urban environments with heavy metal contaminated soils. This study aims to assess potential health risks of heavy metals in soils sampled from an urban environment where high frequency of human exposure may be present. A bioaccessibility test is used, which is an in vitro gastrointestinal (IVG) test of soluble metals under simulated physiological conditions of the human digestion system. Soil samples for assessing the oral bioaccessibility of arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) were collected from a diverse range of different land uses, including urban parks, roadsides, industrial sites and residential areas in Guangzhou City, China. The soil samples contained a wide range of total As (10.2 to 61.0 mg kg−1) and Pb (38.4 to 348 mg kg−1) concentrations. The bioaccessibility of As and Pb in the soil samples were 11.3 and 39.1% in the stomach phase, and 1.9 and 6.9% in the intestinal phase, respectively. The As and Pb bioaccessibility in the small intestinal phase was significantly lower than those in the gastric phase. Arsenic bioaccessibility was closely influenced by soil pH and organic matter content (r 2 = 0.451, p < 0.01) in the stomach phase, and by organic matter, silt and total As contents (r 2 = 0.604, p < 0.001) in the intestinal phase. The general risk of As and Pb intake for children from incidental ingestion of soils is low, compared to their maximum doses, without causing negative human health effects. The exposure risk of Pb in the soils ranked in the order of: industrial area/urban parks > residential area/road side. Although the risk of heavy metal exposure from direct ingestion of urban soils is relatively low, the risk of inhalation of fine soil particulates in the air remains to be evaluated.


Arsenic Lead Oral bioaccessibility In vitro test Urban soil Guangzhou (China) 



This research was supported by the Science & Technology Department of Guangdong Province, China (2004B33301012) and the National Science Foundation of China (40771092).


  1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (2008). Minimal risk levels. Accessed 25 May 2010.
  2. Basta, N. T., Rodriguez, R. R., & Casteel, S. W. (2001). Bioavailability and risk of arsenic exposure by the soil ingestion pathway. In W. T. Frankenberger (Ed.), Environmental chemistry of arsenic (pp. 117–139). New York: Marcel Decker Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Biasioli, M., Barberis, R., & Ajmone-Marsan, F. (2006). The influence of a large city on some soil properties and metals content. Science of the Total Environment, 356, 154–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calabrese, E. J., Stanek, E. J., James, R. C., & Roberts, S. M. (1997). Soil ingestion: A concern for acute toxicity in children. Environmental Health Perspectives, 105, 1354–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carrizales, L., Razo, I., Téllez-Hernández, J. I., Torres-Nerio, R., Torres, A., Batres, L. E., et al. (2006). Exposure to arsenic and lead of children living near a copper-smelter in San Luis Potosi, Mexico: Importance of soil contamination for exposure of children. Environmental Research, 101, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cave, M. L., Wragg, J., Palumbo, B., & Klinck, B. A. (2003). Measurement of the bioaccessibility of arsenic in UK soil. R & D Technical Report P5–062/TR02. Bristol: Environmental Agency.Google Scholar
  7. FAO/WHO. (1993). Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. 41st Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO technical report series; 837, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  8. Gee, G. W., & Bauder, J. W. (1986). Particle size analysis. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods (pp. 383–411). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
  9. Hemond, H. F., & Solo-Gabriele, H. M. (2004). Children’s exposure to arsenic from CCA-treated wooden decks and playground structures. Risk Analysis, 24, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson, D. L., & Bretsch, J. K. (2002). Soil lead and children’s blood lead levels in Syracuse, NY, USA. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 18, 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Juhasz, A. L., Smith, E., Weber, J., Rees, M., Rofe, A., Kuchel, T., et al. (2007a). In vitro assessment of arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated (anthropogenic and geogenic) soils. Chemosphere, 69, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Juhasz, A. L., Smith, E., Weber, J., Rees, M., Rofe, A., Kuchel, T., et al. (2007b). Comparison of in vivo and in vitro methodologies for the assessment of arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils. Chemosphere, 69, 961–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelley, M. E., Brauning, S. E., Schoof, R. A., & Ruby, M. V. (2002). Assessing oral bioavailability of metals in soil. Columbus: Battelle Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lin, G. Z. (2009) Study on epidemiology of children lead poisoning and correlate impacting factors in Guangzhou. Ph D Thesis. Southern Medical University, China (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  15. Lin, G. Z., Peng, R. F., Chen, Q., Wu, Z. G., & Du, L. (2009). Lead in housing paints: An exposure source still not taken seriously for children lead poisoning in China. Environmental Research, 109, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ljung, K., Oomen, A., Duits, M., Selinus, O., & Berglund, M. (2007). Bioaccessibility of metals in urban playground soils. Journal of Environmental Science & Health A, 42, 1241–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ljung, K., Selinus, O., Otabbong, E., & Berglund, M. (2006). Metal and arsenic distribution in soil particle sizes relevant to soil ingestion by children. Applied Geochemistry, 21, 1613–1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu, Y., Gong, Z. T., Zhang, G. L., & Burghardt, W. (2003). Concentrations and chemical speciations of Cu, Zn, Pb and Cr of urban soils in Nanjing, China. Geoderma, 115(1/2), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lu, Y., Zhu, F., Chen, J., Gan, H., & Guo, Y. (2007). Chemical fractionation of heavy metals in urban soils of Guangzhou, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 134, 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luo, W., Lu, Y., Wang, G., Shi, Y., Wang, T., & Giesy, J. P. (2008). Distribution and availability of arsenic in soils from the industrialized urban area of Beijing. China Chemosphere, 72, 797–802.Google Scholar
  21. Madrid, F., Biasioli, M., & Ajmone-Marsan, F. (2008a). Availability and bioaccessibility of metals in fine particles of some urban soils. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 55(1), 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Madrid, F., Díaz-Barrientos, E., & Madrid, L. (2008b). Availability and bio-accessibility of metals in the clay fraction of urban soils of Sevilla. Environmental Pollution, 156, 605–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marschner, B., Welge, P., Hack, A., Witttsiepe, J., & Wilhelm, M. (2006). Comparison of soil Pb in vitro bioaccessibility and in vivo bioavailability with Pb pools from a sequential soil extraction. Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 2812–2818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mielke, H. W., Gonzalez, C. R., Smith, M. K., & Mielke, P. W. (1999). The urban environment and children’s health: soils as an integrator of lead, zinc and cadmium in New Orleans, Louisiana. USA Environmental Research, 81, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mielke, H. W., & Reagan, P. L. (1998). Soil is an important pathway of human lead exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives, 106(Suppl 1), 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nelson, D. W., & Sommers, L. E. (1996). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In D. L. Sparks (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis, Part 3, SSSA Book Ser. 5 (pp. 961–1010). Madison, WI: SSSA.Google Scholar
  27. Palumbo-Roe, B., & Klinck, B. (2007). Bioaccessibility of arsenic in mine waste-contaminated soils: A case study from an abandoned arsenic mine in SW England (UK). Journal of Environmental Science Health A, 42, 1251–1261.Google Scholar
  28. Poggio, L., Vrščaj, B., Schulin, R., Hepperle, E., & Marsan, F. A. (2009). Metals pollution and human bioaccessibility of topsoils in Grugliasco (Italy). Environmental Pollution, 157, 680–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pouschat, P., & Zagury, G. (2006). In vitro gastrointestinal bioavailability of arsenic in soils collected near CCA-treated utility poles. Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 4317–4323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rodriguez, R. R., Basta, N. T., Casteel, S. W., Armstrong, F. P., & Ward, D. C. (1999). An in vitro gastrointestinal method to estimate bioavailable arsenic in contaminated soils and solid media. Environmental Science and Technology, 33, 642–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruby, M. V., Davis, A., Schoof, R., Eberle, S., & Sellstone, C. M. (1996). Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a physiologically based extraction test. Environmental Science and Technology, 30, 422–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruby, M. V., Schoof, R., Brattin, W., Goldade, M., Post, G., Harnois, M., et al. (1999). Advances in evaluating the oral bioavailability of inorganics in soil for use in human health risk assessment. Environmental Science and Technology, 33, 3697–3705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sarkar, D., Makris, K. C., Parra-Noonan, M. T., & Datta, R. (2007). Effect of soil properties on arsenic fractionation and bioaccessibility in cattle and sheep dipping vat sites. Environment International, 33, 164–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schroder, J. L., Basta, N. T., Casteel, S. W., Evans, T. J., Payton, M., & Si, J. (2004). Validation of the in vitro gastrointestinal (IVG) method to estimate relative bioavailable lead in contaminated soil. Journal of Environmental Quality, 33, 513–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sips, A. J. A. M., Bruil, M. A., Dobbe, C. J. G., van de Kamp, E., Oomen, A. G., Pereboom, D. P. K. H., et al. (2001). Bioaccessibility of contaminants from ingested soil in humans, RIVM report 711701012/2001. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM).Google Scholar
  36. US EPA. (1997). Exposure factors handbook volume I: General factors; EPA/600/P-95/002Fa. Washington D.C.: Office of Research and Development, US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  37. US EPA. (2002). Child-specific exposure factors handbook, EPA/600/P-00/002B. Washington, D.C.: National Centre for Environmental Assessment. Google Scholar
  38. US EPA. (2007). Estimation of relative bioavailability of lead in soil and soil-like materials using in vivo and in vitro methods. OSWER 9285.7–77. Washington, D.C.: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  39. Van Wijnen, J. H., Clausing, P., & Brunekreef, B. (1990). Estimated soil ingestion by children. Environmental Research, 51, 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wong, C. S. C., Li, X. D., & Thornton, I. (2006). Urban environmental geochemistry of trace metals. Environmental Pollution, 142, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ying Lu
    • 1
  • Wei Yin
    • 1
  • Longbin Huang
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ganlin Zhang
    • 2
  • Yuguo Zhao
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Natural Resources and EnvironmentSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Institute of Soil ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesNanjingChina
  3. 3.Centre for Mined Land Rehabilitation, Sustainable Minerals InstituteUniversity of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations