Assessment of bioaccessibility and exposure risk of arsenic and lead in urban soils of Guangzhou City, China
- 696 Downloads
Soil ingestion is an important human exposure pathway of heavy metals in urban environments with heavy metal contaminated soils. This study aims to assess potential health risks of heavy metals in soils sampled from an urban environment where high frequency of human exposure may be present. A bioaccessibility test is used, which is an in vitro gastrointestinal (IVG) test of soluble metals under simulated physiological conditions of the human digestion system. Soil samples for assessing the oral bioaccessibility of arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) were collected from a diverse range of different land uses, including urban parks, roadsides, industrial sites and residential areas in Guangzhou City, China. The soil samples contained a wide range of total As (10.2 to 61.0 mg kg−1) and Pb (38.4 to 348 mg kg−1) concentrations. The bioaccessibility of As and Pb in the soil samples were 11.3 and 39.1% in the stomach phase, and 1.9 and 6.9% in the intestinal phase, respectively. The As and Pb bioaccessibility in the small intestinal phase was significantly lower than those in the gastric phase. Arsenic bioaccessibility was closely influenced by soil pH and organic matter content (r 2 = 0.451, p < 0.01) in the stomach phase, and by organic matter, silt and total As contents (r 2 = 0.604, p < 0.001) in the intestinal phase. The general risk of As and Pb intake for children from incidental ingestion of soils is low, compared to their maximum doses, without causing negative human health effects. The exposure risk of Pb in the soils ranked in the order of: industrial area/urban parks > residential area/road side. Although the risk of heavy metal exposure from direct ingestion of urban soils is relatively low, the risk of inhalation of fine soil particulates in the air remains to be evaluated.
KeywordsArsenic Lead Oral bioaccessibility In vitro test Urban soil Guangzhou (China)
This research was supported by the Science & Technology Department of Guangdong Province, China (2004B33301012) and the National Science Foundation of China (40771092).
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (2008). Minimal risk levels. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/mrls/. Accessed 25 May 2010.
- Basta, N. T., Rodriguez, R. R., & Casteel, S. W. (2001). Bioavailability and risk of arsenic exposure by the soil ingestion pathway. In W. T. Frankenberger (Ed.), Environmental chemistry of arsenic (pp. 117–139). New York: Marcel Decker Inc.Google Scholar
- Carrizales, L., Razo, I., Téllez-Hernández, J. I., Torres-Nerio, R., Torres, A., Batres, L. E., et al. (2006). Exposure to arsenic and lead of children living near a copper-smelter in San Luis Potosi, Mexico: Importance of soil contamination for exposure of children. Environmental Research, 101, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cave, M. L., Wragg, J., Palumbo, B., & Klinck, B. A. (2003). Measurement of the bioaccessibility of arsenic in UK soil. R & D Technical Report P5–062/TR02. Bristol: Environmental Agency.Google Scholar
- FAO/WHO. (1993). Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. 41st Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO technical report series; 837, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Gee, G. W., & Bauder, J. W. (1986). Particle size analysis. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods (pp. 383–411). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
- Kelley, M. E., Brauning, S. E., Schoof, R. A., & Ruby, M. V. (2002). Assessing oral bioavailability of metals in soil. Columbus: Battelle Press.Google Scholar
- Lin, G. Z. (2009) Study on epidemiology of children lead poisoning and correlate impacting factors in Guangzhou. Ph D Thesis. Southern Medical University, China (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
- Luo, W., Lu, Y., Wang, G., Shi, Y., Wang, T., & Giesy, J. P. (2008). Distribution and availability of arsenic in soils from the industrialized urban area of Beijing. China Chemosphere, 72, 797–802.Google Scholar
- Nelson, D. W., & Sommers, L. E. (1996). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In D. L. Sparks (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis, Part 3, SSSA Book Ser. 5 (pp. 961–1010). Madison, WI: SSSA.Google Scholar
- Palumbo-Roe, B., & Klinck, B. (2007). Bioaccessibility of arsenic in mine waste-contaminated soils: A case study from an abandoned arsenic mine in SW England (UK). Journal of Environmental Science Health A, 42, 1251–1261.Google Scholar
- Sips, A. J. A. M., Bruil, M. A., Dobbe, C. J. G., van de Kamp, E., Oomen, A. G., Pereboom, D. P. K. H., et al. (2001). Bioaccessibility of contaminants from ingested soil in humans, RIVM report 711701012/2001. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM).Google Scholar
- US EPA. (1997). Exposure factors handbook volume I: General factors; EPA/600/P-95/002Fa. Washington D.C.: Office of Research and Development, US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- US EPA. (2002). Child-specific exposure factors handbook, EPA/600/P-00/002B. Washington, D.C.: National Centre for Environmental Assessment. Google Scholar
- US EPA. (2007). Estimation of relative bioavailability of lead in soil and soil-like materials using in vivo and in vitro methods. OSWER 9285.7–77. Washington, D.C.: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar