Advertisement

Environmental Geochemistry and Health

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 205–216 | Cite as

Geochemistry of soil around a fluoride contaminated area in Nayagarh District, Orissa, India: Factor analytical appraisal

  • S. Tripathy
  • M. K. Panigrahi
  • N. Kundu
Article

Abstract

Fluoride contamination in soil was studied in the vicinity of a hot spring in Nayagarh district of Orissa. Both bulk soil from 0 to 30 cm depth and profile soils from 0 to 90 cm depth were analyzed for total fluoride (F t ) and 0.01 M CaCl2 extractable fluoride (F ca ), major elements, pH, EC and Organic Carbon (OC). High concentrations of both F t and F ca were observed in the area surrounding the hot spring and the village of Singhpur. Principal factor analysis (PFA) on the parameters of the bulk soils suggests that two major chemical processes due to three factors, control the soil geochemistry of the area. Factor-1 contributes 37.11% of the total variance and is strongly loaded with Al, Si, Fe, F t and F ca , and explains the fluoride enrichment of the soil, whereas the second and the third factors contribute 16.6 and 12.2%, respectively and explain the controlling process of carbonate precipitation and soil alkalinity. Multiple regression analysis of the scores of the factors was performed to derive a fluoride contamination index in soil. The magnitude of the factor effect on the contamination index follows the order of Factor-1 > Factor-2 > Factor-3. The spatial distribution of the contamination index is used to classify the area into highly contaminated, moderately contaminated and uncontaminated zones.

Keywords

factor analysis fluoride fluoride contamination index hot spring multiple regression analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brewer, RF. 1966FluorineChapman, HG. eds. Diagnostic Criteria for Plants and SoilsUniversity of California Division of agriculture ScienceRiverside, California180196Google Scholar
  2. Dalton, MG, Upchurch, SB. 1978Interpretation of hydrochemical facies by factor analysisGroundwater16228233Google Scholar
  3. Das, S, Meheta, BC, Samanta, SK, Das, PK, Srivastava, SK. 2000Fluoride hazards in groundwater of Orissa, IndiaIndian J Environ Health14046Google Scholar
  4. Evans, CD, Davies, TD, Wigington, PJ,Jr, Tranter, M, Krester, WA. 1996Use of factor analysis to investigate processes controlling the chemical composition of four streams in the Adirondack mountains, New YorkJ Hydrol185297316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fleischer, M, Robinson, WO. 1963Royal Society of Canada Special Publication65875Google Scholar
  6. Fluhler, H, Polomski, J, Blaser, P. 1982Retention and movement of fluoride in soilsJ Environ Qual11461468Google Scholar
  7. Gilpin, L, Johnson, A.H. 1980Fluorine in agricultural soils of southeastern PennsylvaniaJ Soil Sci Soc of Amer44255258Google Scholar
  8. Kaiser, HF. 1958The verimax criteria for analytical rotation in factor analysisPsychometrika23187200Google Scholar
  9. Kundu, N, Panigrahi, MK, Tripathy, S, Munshi, S, Powell, MA, Hart, BR. 2001Geochemical appraisal of fluoride contamination of groundwater in Nayagargh District of Orissa, IndiaEnviron Geol41451460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kundu, N, Panigrahi, MK, Sharma, SP, Tripathy, S. 2002Delineation of fluoride contaminated groundwater around a hot spring in Nayagarh, Orissa, India using geochemical and resistivity studiesEnviron Geol43228235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Larsen, S, Widdowson, AE. 1971Soil fluorineJournal of soil science22210221Google Scholar
  12. McLaughlin, MJ, Tiller, KG, Naidu, R, Stevens, DP. 1996Review: the behaviour and environmental impact of contaminants in fertilizersAust J Soil Res34154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McQuaker, NR, Gurney, M. 1977Determination of total fluoride in soil and vegetation using an alkali fusion-selective ion electrode techniqueAnal Chem495356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meng, SX, Maynard, JB. 2001Use of statistical analysis to formulate conceptual models of geochemical behavior: water chemical data from Botucatu aquifer in Sao Paulo state, BrazilJ Hydrol2507897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Murray, F. 1984Fluoride Retention in Highly Leached Disturbed SoilsEnviron Pollut, Ser B78395Google Scholar
  16. Omueti, JAI, Jones, RL. 1977Regional distribution of fluorine in Illinois soilsJ Soil Science Soc Amer41771774Google Scholar
  17. Pickering, WF. 1985The mobility of soluble fluoride in soilsEnviron Pollution, Ser B9281308Google Scholar
  18. Polomski, J, Fluhler, H, Blaser, P. 1982Accumulation of airborne fluoride in soilsJ Environ Qual11457461Google Scholar
  19. Reimann, C, Filzmoser, P, Garrett, RG. 2002Factor analysis applied to regional geochemical data: problems and possibilitiesAppl Geochem17185206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stevens, DP, McLaughlin, MJ, Alston, AM. 1997Phytotoxicity of the aluminum-fluoride complexes and their uptake from solution culture by Avena sativa and Lycopersicon esculentumPlant and Soil1928193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stevens, DP, McLaughlin, MJ, Alston, AM. 1998aPhytoxicity of the fluoride ion and its uptake from solution culture by Avena sativa and Lycopersicon esculentumPlant and Soil200119129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stevens, DP, McLaughlin, MJ, Alston, AM. 1998bPhytoxicity of hydrogen fluoride and fluoroborate and their uptake from solution culture by Avena sativa and Lycopersicon esculentumPlant and Soil200175184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Walkley, A, Black, IA. 1934An Examination of degtjareff methods for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modifications of the chromic acid titration methodSoil Science372938Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geology and GeophysicsIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpur

Personalised recommendations