Environmental Fluid Mechanics

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 1–5 | Cite as

Environmental multi-phase fluid mechanics: what, why, how, where to?

  • F. A. Bombardelli
  • H. Chanson
Original Article


In April 2009, the Springer journal Environmental Fluid Mechanics published a special issue on “Recent Advances on Multi-Phase Flows of Environmental Importance” (Env. Fluid Mech., Vol. 9, No. 2, 2009), edited by the same authors of this editorial [1]. That issue featured six high-calibre papers devoted to a range of multi-phase flow topics relevant to environmental and geophysical flows [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]; it is believed that these papers provided a complete picture of the state of the art on the observation and modelling of multi-phase-flows. The significance and impact of these scientific contributions may be arguably quantified in terms of citations. For the last 7 years, the special issue articles were cited between 132 and 236 times altogether (as of May 21, 2016) depending upon the database, representing an average of 2.7–4.8 citations per paper per year. Further, some of those papers have inspired, and have served as a backbone of other recent contributions....


Debris Flow Particle Image Velocimetry Direct Numerical Simulation Hydraulic Jump Particle Tracking Velocimetry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The guest editors thank Professor H. J. Fernando, Editor-in-Chief, for his support. They further acknowledge the contributions of the expert reviewers, without whom the peer-review process and research quality control would have been impossible.


  1. 1.
    Bombardelli FA, Chanson H (2009) Progress in the observation and modeling of turbulent multi-phase flows. Environ Fluid Mech 9(2):121–123. doi: 10.1007/s10652-009-9125-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Muste M, Yu K, Fujita I, Ettema R (2009) Two-phase flow insights into open-channel flows with suspended particles of different densities. Environ Fluid Mech 9(2):161–186. doi: 10.1007/s10652-008-9102-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loth E, Dorgan AJ (2009) An equation of motion for particles of finite Reynolds number and size. Environ Fluid Mech 9(2):187–206. doi: 10.1007/s10652-009-9123-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murzyn F, Chanson H (2009) Experimental investigation of bubbly flow and turbulence in hydraulic jumps. Environ Fluid Mech 9(2):143–159. doi: 10.1007/s10652-008-9077-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chanson H (2009) Turbulent air-water flows in hydraulic structures: dynamic similarity and scale effects. Environ Fluid Mech 9(2):125–142. doi: 10.1007/s10652-008-9078-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bombardelli FA, Jha SK (2009) Hierarchical modeling of the dilute transport of suspended sediment in open channels. Environ Fluid Mech 9(2):207–235. doi: 10.1007/s10652-008-9091-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jha SK, Bombardelli FA (2009) Two-phase modeling of turbulence in dilute sediment-laden, open-channel flows. Environ Fluid Mech 9(2):237–266. doi: 10.1007/s10652-008-9118-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crowe C, Sommerfeld M, Tsuji M (2011) Multiphase flows with droplets and particles. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chanson H (2007) Hydraulic engineering in the 21st century: where to? J Hydraul Res 45(3):291–301. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2007.9521764 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chanson H (2013) Hydraulics of aerated flows: qui pro quo? J Hydraul Res 51(3):223–243. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2013.795917 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bombardelli FA (2012) Computational multi-phase fluid dynamics to address flows past hydraulic structures. In: Matos J, Pagliara S, Meireles I (eds) Proceedings of 4th IAHR international symposium on hydraulic structures ISHS2014, APRH—Associação Portuguesa dos Recursos Hídricos [Portuguese Water Resources Association], 9–11 February 2012, Porto, Keynote lectureGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jha SK, Bombardelli FA (2010) Toward two-phase flow modeling of nondilute sediment transport in open channels. J Geoph Res 115(F3):F03015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang H, Murzyn F (2016) Experimental assessment of characteristic turbulent scales in two-phase flow of hydraulic jump: from bottom to free surface. Environ Fluid Mech. doi: 10.1007/s10652-016-9451-6 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang G, Chanson H (2016) Self-aeration in smooth and stepped chutes. Environ Fluid Mech. doi: 10.1007/s10652-015-9442-z Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lubin P, Chanson H (2016) Are breaking waves, bores, surges and jumps the same flow? Environ Fluid Mech. doi: 10.1007/s10652-016-9475-y Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khosronejad A, Diplas P, Sotiropoulos F (2016) Simulation-based optimization of in–stream structures design: bendway weirs. Environ Fluid Mech. doi: 10.1007/s10652-016-9452-5 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    González C, Richter DH, Bolster D, Bateman S, Calantoni J, Escauriaza C (2016) Characterization of bedload intermittency near the threshold of motion using a Lagrangian sediment transport model. Environ Fluid Mech. doi: 10.1007/s10652-016-9476-x Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lyu L, Wang Z, Cui P (2016) Mechanism of the intermittent motion of two-phase debris flows. Environ Fluid Mech. doi: 10.1007/s10652-016-9483-y Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Imran J, Khan SM, Pirmez C, Parker G (2016) Froude scaling limitations in modeling of turbidity currents. Environ Fluid Mech. doi: 10.1007/s10652-016-9488-6 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA
  2. 2.School of Civil EngineeringThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations