Environmental Fluid Mechanics

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 231–246 | Cite as

Warm discharges in cold fresh water: 2. Numerical simulation of laminar line plumes

  • Alabodite M. George
  • Anthony Kay
Original Article


The behaviour of a discharge of warm water upwards into a homogeneous body of cold fresh water was investigated by means of a numerical model. The discharge has a parabolic velocity profile, with Reynolds number \(Re=50\), Prandtl number \(Pr=7\) and Froude number varied over the range \(0.2 \le {\rm Fr} \le 2.5\). Water density is taken to be a quadratic function of temperature, so that an initially positively buoyant discharge will experience buoyancy reversal as it mixes with an ambient below the temperature of maximum density. The resulting plume has some similarities to a fountain resulting from injection of negatively buoyant fluid upward into a less dense ambient. The plume is initially symmetric, but then its head detaches as it approaches its maximum height. The detached head is denser than the fluid in the plume below it, and the interaction between the sinking head and the rising plume causes a sideways deflection; as this cycle is repeated, the plume displays side-to-side flapping motion and vertical bobbing. As Froude number is increased (i.e. buoyancy reduced) the growth of the plume becomes slower, but the plume eventually reaches a greater height. We obtain empirical power-law scalings for maximum height and time taken to reach that height as functions of Froude number; these scalings are simlar to those for fountains with a linear dependence of density on temperature in the very weak regime.


Cold water Line plume Buoyancy reversal Numerical simulation 


  1. 1.
    Foster TD (1972) An analysis of the cabbeling instability in sea water. J Phys Oceanogr 2:294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Macqueen JF (1979) Turbulence and cooling water discharges from power stations. In: Harris CJ (ed) Mathematical modelling of turbulent diffusion in the environment. Academic Press, London, pp 379–437Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marmoush YR, Smith AA, Hamblin PF (1984) Pilot experiments on thermal bar in lock exchange flow. J Energy Eng ASCE 110:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoglund B, Spigarelli SA (1972) Studies of the sinking plume phenomenon. In: Proceedings of the 15th conference on great lakes research. International Association of Great Lakes Research, Ann Arbor, pp 614–624Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bukreev VI, Gusev AV (2011) The effect of densification during mixing on the spreading of a vertical round jet. Dokl Earth Sci 439:1002–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lin W, Armfield WS (2000) Direct simulation of weak axisymmetric fountains in a homogeneous fluid. J Fluid Mech 403:67–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin W, Armfield WS (2000) Direct simulation of weak laminar plane fountains in a homogeneous fluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf 43:3013–3026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin W, Armfield WS (2003) The Reynolds and Prandtl number dependence of weak fountains. Comput Mech 31:379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Srinarayana N, McBain DG, Armfield WS, Lin W (2008) Height and stability of laminar plane fountains in a homogeneous fluid. Int J Heat Mass Transf 51:4717–4727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Srinarayana N, Armfield WS, Lin W (2013) Behaviour of laminar plane fountains with a parabolic inlet velocity profile in a homogeneous fluid. Int J Therm Sci 67:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Williamson N, Srinarayana N, Armfield WS, McBain DG, Lin W (2008) Low-Reynolds-number fountain behaviour. J Fluid Mech 608:297–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Srinarayana N, Williamson N, Armfield WS, Lin W (2010) Line fountain behaviour at low Reynolds number. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53:2065–2073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burridge HC, Mistry A, Hunt GR (2015) The effect of source Reynolds number on the rise height of a fountain. Phys Fluids 27:047101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Turner JS (1966) Jets and plumes with negative or reversing buoyancy. J Fluid Mech 26:779–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caulfield C-CP, Woods AW (1995) Plumes with non-monotonic mixing behaviour. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn 79:173–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morton BR, Taylor GI, Turner JS (1956) Turbulent gravitational convection from maintained and instantaneous sources. Proc R Soc Lond A 234:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kay A (2007) Warm discharges in cold fresh water: 1. Line plumes in a uniform ambient. J Fluid Mech 574:239–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moore DR, Weiss NO (1973) Nonlinear penetrative convection. J Fluid Mech 61:553–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oosthuizen PH, Paul JT (1996) A numerical study of the steady state freezing of water in an open rectangular cavity. Int J Numer Meth Heat Fluid Flow 6:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    COMSOL Multiphysics Cyclopedia: The finite element method. Accessed 28 April 2016
  21. 21.
    Vinoth BR, Panigrahi PK (2014) Characteristics of low Reynolds number non-Boussinesq fountains from non-circular sources. Phys Fluids 26:014106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Simpson JE (1982) Gravity currents in the laboratory, atmosphere, and ocean. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 14:213–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lin W, Armfield WS (2000) Very weak fountains in a homogeneous fluid. Numer Heat Transf A 38:377–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesLoughborough UniversityLeicestershireUK

Personalised recommendations