Numerical modeling of simultaneous tracer release and piscicide treatment for invasive species control in the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, Chicago, Illinois
- 174 Downloads
In December 2009, during a piscicide treatment targeting the invasive Asian carp in the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, Rhodamine WT dye was released to track and document the transport and dispersion of the piscicide. In this study, two modeling approaches are presented to reproduce the advection and dispersion of the dye tracer (and piscicide), a one-dimensional analytical solution and a three-dimensional numerical model. The two approaches were compared with field measurements of concentration and their applicability is discussed. Acoustic Doppler current profiler measurements were used to estimate the longitudinal dispersion coefficients at ten cross sections, which were taken as reference for calibrating the longitudinal dispersion coefficient in the one-dimensional analytical solution. While the analytical solution is fast, relatively simple, and can fairly accurately predict the core of the observed concentration time series at points downstream, it does not capture the tail of the breakthrough curves. These tails are well reproduced by the three-dimensional model, because it accounts for the effects of dead zones and a power plant which withdraws nearly 80 % of the water from the canal for cooling purposes before returning it back to the canal.
KeywordsNumerical modeling Rhodamine Dye tracer Rotenone piscicide Breakthrough curve Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Asian carp
The support of the Chester and Helen Siess Professorship and the M.T. Geoffrey Yeh Chair in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, is greatly acknowledged. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
- 1.Pointwise. http://www.pointwise.com/gridgen/. Accessed 25 Mar 2015
- 9.Finlayson BJ, Schnick RA, Cailteux RL, DeMong L, Horton WD, McClay W, Thompson C, Tichacek GJ (2000) Rotenone use in fisheries management: administrative and technical guidelines manual. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
- 10.Fischer H, List E, Koh R, Imberger J, Brooks N (1979) Mixing in Inland and coastal waters. Academic Press, Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 14.Hamrick J (1992) A three-dimensional environmental fluid dynamics computer code: theoretical and computational aspects. Technical Report 317 in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, School of Marine Science, The College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062Google Scholar
- 15.Jackson PR, Lageman JD (2014) Real-time piscicide tracking using Rhodamine WT dye for support of application, transport, and deactivation strategies in riverine environments. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013-5211. doi: 10.3133/sir20135211
- 17.Kolar CS, Chapman DC, Courtenay W, Housel C, Williams J, Jennings D (2007) Bigheaded carps: a biological synopsis and environmental risk assessment. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
- 18.Lanyon R (2012) Building the Canal to Save Chicago. Xlibris, CorpGoogle Scholar
- 20.Martin JE, Carr ML, García MH (2012) Handbook of environmental fluid dynamics: systems, pollution, modeling, and measurements, vol 2, chap. 16. Riverine Transport, Mixing, and Dispersion, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 215–228Google Scholar
- 24.Morales VM, Mier JM, Garcia MH (2015) Innovative modeling framework for combined sewer overflows prediction. Urban Water J. doi: 10.1080/1573062X.2015.1057183
- 28.Rutherford JC (1994) River mixing. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- 33.U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2014) The GLMRIS report: Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin StudyGoogle Scholar