Determination of the optimum MM5 configuration for long term CMAQ simulations of aerosol bound pollutants in Europe
- 72 Downloads
Realistic meteorological fields are a prerequisite for the determination of pollutant concentrations and depositions by means of a chemistry transport model. Different configurations of the 5th generation NCAR/Penn State University mesoscale meteorological model MM5 were tested to determine the optimum set up for long term hindcasts that cover several months up to years. Four dimensional data assimilation (FDDA) significantly enhances the spatio temporal representation of temperature, humidity and wind. Best agreement with radiosonde observations could be achieved when temperature, humidity and wind were grid nudged every 6 h. The quality of the resulting meteorological fields showed no significant systematic temporal or spatial variation over Europe in a model run of the year 2000. It was found that the hydrological cycle was not correctly reproduced by the model when no nudging was applied. The relevant model run showed too high relative humidity and too high rainfall when compared to observations. This led to considerably lower aerosol concentrations close to ground and a shift in the deposition patterns of particle bound pollutants like the carcinogenic benzo(a)pyrene (B(a)P).
KeywordsChemistry transport model Mesoscale meteorological model Four Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA) Aerosol Benzo(a)pyrene
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Byun D, Ching J (1999) Science algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system. EPA/600/R-99/030. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 9.Colle B, Olson J, Tongue J (2003) Multiseason Verification of the MM5 Part II Evaluation of High-Resolution Precipitation Forecasts over the Northeastern United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 18: 458–480Google Scholar
- 10.Denier van der Gon H, van het Bolscher M, Visschedijk A, Zandveld P (2005) Study of the effectiveness of UNECE Persistent Organic Pollutants Protocol and cost of possible additional measures. Phase I: estimation of emission reduction resulting from the implementation of the POP Protocol. TNO report B& O-A R 2005/194, TNO, Appeldoorn, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
- 12.Friedrich R, Reis S (2004) Emissions of air pollutants. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 15.Grell G, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR (1995) A description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Technical Note 398, NCAR, Boulder, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
- 19.Klein Tank AMG, Wijngaard JB, Konnen GP, Bohm R, Demaree G, Gocheva A, Mileta M, Pashiardis S, Hejkrlik L, Kern-Hansen C, Heino R, Bessemoulin P, Muller-Westermeier G, Tzanakou M, Szalai S, Palsdottir T, Fitzgerald D, Rubin S, Capaldo M, Maugeri M, Leitass A, Bukantis A, Aberfeld R, Van Engelen AFV, Forland E, Mietus M, Coelho F, Mares C, Razuvaev V, Nieplova E, Cegnar T, Lopez JA, Dahlstrom B, Moberg A, Kirchhofer W, Ceylan A, Pachaliuk O, Alexander LV, Petrovic P (2002) Daily dataset of 20th-century surface air temperature and precipitation series for the European Climate Assessment. Int J Climatol 22(12): 1441–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Memmesheimer M, Jakobs HJ, Piekorz G, Ebel A, Kerschgens MJ, Friese E, Feldmann H, Geiß H (2001) Air quality modeling with the EURAD model. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on harmonisation within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes. BelgirateGoogle Scholar
- 23.Schell B, Ackermann IJ, Hass H, Binkowski FS, Ebel A (2001) Modelling the formation of secondary organic aerosol within a comprehensive air quality model system. J Geophys Res 2106(D22): 28,275–28,293Google Scholar
- 26.Vestreng V, Klein H (2002) Emission data reported to UNECE/EMEP: quality assurance and trend analysis & presentation of WebDab. EMEP/MSC-W Note 1/2002. Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar