Preliminary prioritization based on partial order theory and R software for compositional complexes in landscape ecology, with applications to restoration, remediation, and enhancement
- 131 Downloads
The present purpose is to provide convenient computational capability and visualizations for preliminary partial or progressive prioritization based largely on concepts of partial order theory and implemented in R software as illustrated in a context of conservation and sustainable stewardship across landscapes with ecosystem services as a complex multidimensional domain that must be placed in public and private perspective in pursuit of multi-resource management. Practical perspective is promoted by graphic visualization with local partial order modeling (LPOM) methods for screening of settings and scenarios involving interactions of ecosystem elements as evidenced by environmental indicators. ORDIT ordering and precedence plots arise from ascribed advantage as an outcome of a rating regime. Representative ranks constitute criteria drawn from the rank distribution for the case in question. Distal data are determined with regard to remediation and retention. Median mismatches reflect interplay of indicators appearing as isolated instances in plotting patterns. A suggested strategy to circumvent computational constraints is partitioning the pool of cases into collectives by clustering, pursuing classes of partitions, and then prioritizing in particular partitions. When prime prospects have been obtained, detailed determinations can be done with partial ordering procedures involving Hasse diagrams and similarly complex constructs that are difficult to apply with many cases and/or indicator criteria.
KeywordsLandscape ecology Environmental indicators Partial order Ordination Visualization Prioritization Remediation R software Computational complexity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alvarez M, Field D (2009) Tradeoffs among ecosystem benefits: an analysis framework in the evaluation of forest management alternatives. J For 107: 188–196Google Scholar
- Bruggemann R, Sorensen P, Lerche D, Carlsen L (2004) Estimation of averaged ranks by a local partial order model. J Chem Inf Comp Sc 44: 618–625Google Scholar
- Bruggemann R, Simon U, Mey S (2005) Estimation of averaged ranks by extended local partial order models. MATCH Commun Math Comput Chem 54: 489–518Google Scholar
- Bruggemann R, Patil GP (2010) Ranking and prioritization with multi-indicator systems. Technical Report No. 2010–0331 (Draft Monograph), Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics, Dept. of Statistics: The Pennsylvania State University, Univ. Park, PA, 16802, USAGoogle Scholar
- Bruggemann R, Patil GP Multicriteria prioritization and partial order in environmental sciences. Environ Ecol Stat 17Google Scholar
- De Loof K, De Meyer H, De Baets B (2006) Exploiting the lattice of ideals representation of a poset. Fundam Informaticae 71: 309–321Google Scholar
- Miller D, Wigley T, Miller K (2009) Managed forests and conservation of terrestrial biodiversity in the southern United States. J For 107: 197–203Google Scholar
- Myers W, Bishop J, Brooks R, O’Connell T, Argent D, Storm G, Stauffer J Jr (2000) The Pennsylvania GAP Analysis Final Report; The Pennsylvania State University, Univ. Park, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
- Newlin J, Myers W, Patil GP, Joshi S (2010) Improving transparency of bridge condition for decision-making and analysis in bridge management. In: Frangopool D, Sause R, Kusko C (eds) Bridge maintenance, safety, management and life-cycle optimization. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 3409–3414Google Scholar
- Patil GP, Myers W (2008) Digital governance and hotspot geoinformatics of biodiversity measurement, comparison and management in the age of indicators and information technology; Technical Report No. 2008–1121, Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics, Dept. of Statistics: The Pennsylvania State University, Univ. Park, PA, 16802, USAGoogle Scholar
- Venables W, Smith D (2004) An Introduction to R, revised and updated. Network Theory Limited, BristolGoogle Scholar