Abstract
The combined mark-recapture and line transect sampling methodology proposed by Alpizar-Jara and Pollock [Journal of Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 3(4), 311–327, 1996; In Marine Mammal Survey and Assessment Methods Symposium. G.W. Garner, S.C. Amstrup, J.L. Laake, B.F.J. Manly, L.L. McDonald, and D.C. Robertson (Eds.), A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, pp. 99–114, 1999] is used to illustrate the estimation of population size for populations with prominent nesting structures (i.e., bald eagle nests). In the context of a bald eagle population, the number of nests in a list frame corresponds to a “pre-marked” sample of nests, and an area frame corresponds to a set of transect strips that could be regularly monitored. Unlike previous methods based on dual frame methodology using the screening estimator [Haines and Pollock (Journal of Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 5, 245–256, 1998a; Survey Methodology, 24(1), 79–88, 1998b)], we no longer need to assume that the area frame is complete (i.e., all the nests in the sampled sites do not need to be seen). One may use line transect sampling to estimate the probability of detection in a sampled area. Combining information from list and area frames provides more efficient estimators than those obtained by using data from only one frame. We derive an estimator for detection probability and generalize the screening estimator. A simulation study is carried out to compare the performance of the Chapman modification of the Lincoln–Petersen estimator to the screening estimator. Simulation results show that although the Chapman estimator is generally less precise than the screening estimator, the latter can be severely biased in presence of uncertain detection. The screening estimator outperforms the Chapman estimator in terms of mean squared error when detection probability is near 1 wheareas the Chapman estimator outperforms the screening estimator when detection probability is lower than a certain threshold value depending on particular scenarios.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alpizar-Jara, R. (1997) Assessing assumption violations in line transect sampling. Ph.D. Thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
R. Alpizar-Jara K.H. Pollock (1996) ArticleTitleA combination line transect and capture–recapture sampling model for multiple observers in aerial surveys Journal of Environmental and Ecological Statistics 3 IssueID4 311–327 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00539369
R. Alpizar-Jara K.H. Pollock (1999) Combining line transect and capture–recapture for mark-resighting experiments G.W. Garner S.C. Amstrup J.L. Laake B.F.J. Manly L.L. Mc.Donald D.G. Robertson (Eds) Marine Mammal Survey and Assessment Methods Symposium A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam Netherlands 99–114
D.G. Chapman (1951) ArticleTitleSome properties of the hypergeometric distribution with applications to zoological censuses University of California Publications in Statistics 1 131–160
Haines, D.E. (1997) Estimating population parameters using multiple frame and capture-recapture methodology. Ph.D. Thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina. 226 p.
D.E. Haines K.H. Pollock (1998a) ArticleTitleEstimating the number of active and successful bald eagle nests: an application of the dual frame method Journal of Environmental and Ecological Statistics 5 245–256 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1009673403664
D.E. Haines K.H. Pollock (1998b) ArticleTitleCombining multiple frames to estimate population size and totals Survey Methodology 24 IssueID1 79–88
Hartley, H.O. (1962) Multiple Frame Surveys. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section. American Statistical Association, 203–206.
H.O. Hartley (1974) ArticleTitleMultiple frame methodology and selected applications Sankhyá 36 99–118
Kott, P.S. and Vogel, F.A. (1995) Multiple-Frame Business Surveys, Surveys Methods for Business, Farms, and Institutions, B.G. Cox, (eds), John Wiley and Sons, pp. 185–203.
Nealon, J.P. (1984). Review of the multiple and area frame estimators. Staff Report 80. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Statistical Reporting Service. Washington, D.C.
G.A.F. Seber (1970) ArticleTitleThe effects of trap response on tag-recapture estimates Biometrics 26 13–22
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alpizar-Jara, R., Pollock, K.H. & Haines, D.E. Mark-recapture estimators for dual frame population size of prominent nesting structures: the effect of uncertain detection probability. Environ Ecol Stat 12, 155–168 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-005-1039-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-005-1039-0