Environmental and Ecological Statistics

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 397–414 | Cite as

Optimal spatial sampling schemes for environmental surveys

  • Simone Di Zio
  • Lara Fontanella
  • Luigi Ippoliti


A practical problem in spatial statistics is that of constructing spatial sampling designs for environmental monitoring network. This paper presents a fractal-based criterion for the construction of coverage designs to optimize the location of sampling points. The algorithm does not depend on the covariance structure of the process and provides desirable results for situations in which a poor prior knowledge is available. The statistical characteristics of the method are explored by a simulation study while a design exercise concerning the Pescara area monitoring network is used to demonstrate potential designs under realistic assumptions.

: fractal dimension sampling optimal spatial designs space-filling designs 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aarts, E. and Korst, J. (1990)Simulated Annealing and Boltzmann Machines-A stochastic Approach to Combinatorial Optimization and Neural Computing, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Di Battista, T. and Ippoliti, L. (1999)A spatial model building strategy. Journal of the Italian Statistical Society, 8, 2, 3.Google Scholar
  3. Christakos, G. and Olea, R. A. (1992)Sampling design for spatially distributed hydrogeologic and environmental processes. Advances Water Resources, 15, 219-37.Google Scholar
  4. Cressie, N. (1993). Statistics for Spatial Data, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Di Zio, S., Fontanella, L., and Ippoliti, L. (2002)Fractal Geometry For Optimal Spatial Sampling Designs. LASR Conference 2002. STATISTICS OF LARGE DATASETS. Functional and Image Data, Bioinformatics and Data Mining, University of Leeds, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Gatrell, A. C., Bailey, C. T., Diggle, P. J., and Rowlingson, B. S. (1996)Spatial point pattern analysis and its application in geographical epidemiology. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. NS 21 256-274 1996, ISSN 0020-2754, Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).Google Scholar
  7. Gibson, L. and Lucas, D. (1982)Spatial data processing using balanced ternary. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Pattern Recognition and Image Processing. IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Springs, MD.Google Scholar
  8. Goovaerts P. (2000)Estimation on simulation of soil properties?On optimisation problem with conflicting criteria. Geoderma, 97 (3), 165-186 (22).Google Scholar
  9. Hastings, H. M. and Sugihara, G. (1993)Fractals:A user 's Guide for the Natural Sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 235.Google Scholar
  10. Jagadish, H. V. (1990)Linear clustering of objects with multiple attributes. SIGMOD Conference, 332-42.Google Scholar
  11. Lark, R. M. (2002)Optimized spatial sampling of soil for estimation of the variogram by maximum likelihood. Geoderma., 105, 49-80.Google Scholar
  12. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982)The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Mark, D. M. (1990)Neighbor-based properties of some orderings of two-dimensional space. Geographical Analysis, 2, 145-57Google Scholar
  14. Martin, R. J., Di Battista, T., Ippoliti, L., and Nissi, E. (2000)A Point Source Model for Spatial Data. Technical Report STAT. 503/2000, Sheffield University.Google Scholar
  15. Mate ´rn, B. (1960)Spatial variation. Meddelanden fran Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  16. Matheron, G. (1963)Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology, 58, 1246-66.Google Scholar
  17. Mathworks (2000)Matlab, version 6. 1. Natick, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  18. Nychka, D., Yang, Q., and Royle, J. A. (1997)Constructing spatial designs using regression subset selection, in Statistics for the Environment Barnett V. and Turkman K. F. (eds. ), Vol. 3 Pollutation Assessment and Control. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Olea, R. A. (1984)Sampling design optimization for spatial functions. Mathematical Geology, 16, 369-92.Google Scholar
  20. Stevens, Jr. D. L. and Olsen, A. R. (1999)Spatially restricted surveys over time for aquatic resources. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Vol. 4 (4), pp. 415-28.Google Scholar
  21. Stevens, Jr. D. L. and Olsen, A. R. (2000)Spatially-restricted Random sampling Designs for Design-based and Model-based estimation. In Accuracy 2000:Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Delft University Press, The Netherlands. pp. 609-16.Google Scholar
  22. Stevens, Jr. D. L. and Olsen, A. R. (2004)Spatially balanced sampling of natural resources. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99 (465), 262-278 (17).Google Scholar
  23. Van Groenigen, J. W. (2000)The influence of variogram parameters on optimal sampling scheme for mapping by kriging. Geoderma, 97, 223-36.Google Scholar
  24. Van Groenigen, J. W. and Stein, A. (1998)Spatial Simulated Annnealing for constrained optimization of spatial sampling schemes, Journal of Environmental Quality, 27, 1078-86.Google Scholar
  25. Yamada, I. and Rogerson, P. (2003)An empirical comparison of edge effects correction methods applied to K-function analysis. Geographical Analaysis. 35, 2.Google Scholar
  26. Yfantis, E. A., Flatman, G. T., and Behar, J. V. (1987)Effciency of kriging estimation for square, triangular, and hexagonal grids. Mathematical Geology, 19, 183-205.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Di Zio
    • 1
  • Lara Fontanella
    • 1
  • Luigi Ippoliti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Quantitative Methods and Economic TheoryUniversity G.D'AnnunzioViale Pindaro 42Italy

Personalised recommendations