Advertisement

Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 96, Issue 3, pp 367–380 | Cite as

Alienation in mathematics education: a problem considered from neo-Vygotskian approaches

Article

Abstract

In a recent article published in this journal, Williams (Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92, 59–72, 2016) offers a critique of neo-Vygotskian perspectives exemplified in recent work on the funds of knowledge and on cultural-historical activity theoretic perspectives. The critique has great value in that it asks interesting questions that often go unnoticed and fail to be discussed in mathematics education research—e.g., the question of alienation or the role of agency in Vygotsky’s notion of the zone of proximal development. Despite the great value of the questions raised, the critique fails because its idealist theoretical epistemological underpinning is at odds with Vygotsky’s thought and cultural-historical activity research in general. The critique falls short especially on the point of realizing the materialist dialectical method Vygotsky employed. The goal of this article is to address Williams’ critique by (a) revisiting the main argument of the critique, (b) articulating the departures of the critique from the materialist dialectical method, (c) conceptualizing development along the theoretical lines of the late (Spinozist-Marxian) Vygotsky, and (d) formulating a materialist dialectical approach to alienation. We conclude by summarizing three main problems of the critique.

Keywords

Cultural-historical theory Alienation Development Activity Materialist dialectical method Vygotsky 

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems in Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bishop, A. (1988). Mathematics education and culture. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. D'Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44–48.Google Scholar
  5. Hegel, G. W. F. (1979). Werke Band 2 [Works vol. 2]. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  6. Henry, M. (1976). Marx: II. Une philosophie de l’économie [Marx: II. A philosophy of economy]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  7. Holzkamp, K. (1993). Lernen: Subjektwissenschaftliche Grundlegung [Learning: A subject-scientific foundation]. Campus: Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar
  8. Il’enkov, E. V. (2007). A contribution to a conversation about Meshcheriakov. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 45(4), 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lerman, S. (1996). Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: A challenge to the radical constructivist paradigm? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Levinas, E. (1978). Autrement qu’être ou au-delà de l’essence [Otherwise than being or beyond essence]. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  11. Martin, J. (2004). The educational inadequacy of conceptions of self in educational psychology. Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education, 35, 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1962a). Werke Band 2 [Works vol. 2]. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
  13. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1962b). Werke Band 23 [Works vol. 23]. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
  14. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1975). Werke Band 20 [Works vol. 20]. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
  15. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1978). Werke Band 3 [Works vol. 3]. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
  16. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1981). Werke Band 1 [Works vol. 1]. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
  17. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1983). Werke Band 42 [Works vol. 42]. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
  18. Meshcheryakov, A. (1974). Slepoglyxonemye deti: razvitie psyxiki v processe formirovanija pobedenija [Deaf-blind children: Development of mind in the formation of behavior]. Moscow: Pedagogika.Google Scholar
  19. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C. A., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2005). The Ontario curriculum grades 1–8: Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/math18curr.pdf
  21. Piaget, J. (1967). Études sociologiques [Sociological studies]. Genève: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
  22. Radford, L. (2012). Education and the illusions of emancipation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Radford, L. (2016). On alienation in the mathematics classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 258–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Radford, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2011). Intercorporeality and ethical commitment: An activity perspective on classroom interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2–3), 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roth, W.-M. (2012). Mathematical learning: The unseen and unforeseen. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(3), 15–21.Google Scholar
  27. Roth, W.-M. (2016). On the social nature of mathematical reasoning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 36(2), 34–39.Google Scholar
  28. Roth, W.-M., & Maheux, J.-F. (2015). The visible and the invisible: The immanence of doing mathematics and mathematics as revelation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thompson, P. (2014). Constructivism in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 96–100). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Vološinov, V. N. (1930). Marksizm i filosofija jazyka: osnovye problemy sociologičeskogo metoda b nauke o jazyke [Marxism and the philosophy of language: Main problems of the sociological method in linguistics]. Leningrad, USSR: Priboj.Google Scholar
  32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 1: Problems of general psychology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1989). Concrete human psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27(2), 53–77.Google Scholar
  34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 3: Problems of the theory and history of psychology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). Collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, vol. 5. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  36. Waldenfels, B. (2006). Grundmotive einer Phänomenologie des Fremden [Fundamental ideas of a phenomenology of the alien]. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar
  37. Williams, J. (2016). Alienation in mathematics education: Critique and development of neo-Vygotskian perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.École des sciences de I’éducationUniversité LaurentienneSudburyCanada
  2. 2.University of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations