Abstract
Although lecture is the traditional method of university mathematics instruction, there has been little empirical research that describes the general structure of lectures. In this paper, we adapt ideas from narrative analysis and apply them to an upper-level mathematics lecture. We develop a framework that enables us to conceptualize the lecture as consisting of collections of narratives to identify connections between the narratives and to use the narrative structure to identify key features of the lecture. In particular, we use the idea of framing and embedded narratives to identify central ideas in the lecture and to understand how examples, diagrams, and smaller claims contribute to the development of those ideas. Additionally, we create a graph structure for the lecture using the repetition of mathematical ideas across embedded narratives, and we employ graph-theoretic analysis to support our identification of framing narratives and to highlight particular roles of embedded narratives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, H. P. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Andrà, C. (2013). How do students understand mathematical lectures? Note-taking as retelling of the teacher’s story. For the Learning of Mathematics, 33(2), 18–23.
Artemeva, N., & Fox, J. (2011). The writing’s on the board: The global and the local in teaching undergraduate mathematics through chalk talk. Written Communication, 28(4), 345–379.
Bal, M. (2009). Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative (3rd ed., C. Van Boheemen, Trans.). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
Bowers, J. S., & Nickerson, S. (2001). Identifying cyclic patterns of interaction to study individual and collective learning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 3(1), 1–28.
Bressoud, D., Mesa, V., & Rasmussen, C. (Eds.). (2015). Insights and recommendations from the MAA National Study of College Calculus (MAA Notes). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Brooks, P. (1992). Reading for the plot: Design and intention in narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Childs, P., & Fowler, R. (2006). The Routledge dictionary of literary terms. New York: Routledge.
Clauset, A. (2005). Finding local community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 72(2), 026132.
Coulter, C. A., & Smith, M. L. (2009). The construction zone: Literary elements in narrative research. Educational Researcher, 38, 577–590.
Crossley, M., & Vulliamy, G. (1997). Qualitative educational research in developing countries. New York, NY: Garland.
Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E. P., & Mark, J. (1996). Habits of mind: An organizing principle for a mathematics curriculum. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(4), 375–402.
Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
de Freitas, E. (2012). The diagram as story: Unfolding the event-structure of the mathematical diagram. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(2), 27–33.
Dietiker, L. (2013). Mathematical texts as narrative: Rethinking curriculum. For the Learning of Mathematics, 33(3), 14–19.
Emden, C. (1998). Conducting a narrative analysis. Collegian, 5(3), 34–39.
Freeman, L. C., Borgatti, S. P., & White, D. R. (1991). Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks, 13(2), 141–154.
Fukawa-Connelly, T. P. (2012). A case study of one instructor’s lecture-based teaching of proof in abstract algebra: Making sense of her pedagogical moves. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81, 325–345.
Gansner, E. R., Koutsofios, E., North, S. C., & Vo, K. P. (1993). A technique for drawing directed graphs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19(3), 214–230.
Gerofsky, S. (1996). Selling mathematics: The language of persuasion in an introductory calculus course. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1996 Meeting: Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 409–417). Valencia, Spain: University of Valencia.
Güçler, B. (2013). Examining the discourse on the limit concept in a beginning-level calculus classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82, 439–453.
Hannah, J., Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. (2011). Analysing lecturer practice: The role of orientations and goals. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 975–984.
Holley, K., & Coylar, J. (2012). Under construction: How narrative elements shape qualitative research. Theory Into Practice, 51(2), 114–121.
Holley, K. A., & Colyar, J. (2009). Rethinking texts: Narrative and the construction of qualitative research. Educational Researcher 38(9), 680–686.
Hora, M. T., & Ferrare, J. J. (2013). Instructional systems of practice: A multidimensional analysis of math and science undergraduate course planning and classroom teaching. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(2), 212–257.
Juzwik, M. (2006). Situating narrative-minded research: A commentary on Anna Sfard and Anna Prusak’s “telling identities”. Educational Researcher, 35(9), 13–21.
Kleinberg, J. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46(5), 604–632.
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
Margolin, U. (2012). Mathematics and narrative: A narratological perspective. In A. K. Doxiádis & B. Mazur (Eds.), Circles disturbed: The interplay of mathematics and narrative (pp. 481–507). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mark, J., Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E. P., & Sword, S. (2010). Contemporary curriculum issues: Developing mathematical habits of mind. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 15(9), 505–509.
Mills, M. (2012, February). Investigating the teaching practices of professors when presenting proofs: The use of examples. In S. Brown, S. Larsen, K. Marrongelle, & M. Oehrtman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Conference for Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 512–516). Portland, OR: Portland State University.
Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. London: Harvard University Press.
Movshovitz-Hadar, N., & Hazzan, O. (2004). The rhetoric of an outstanding lecturer or how to present it? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 35(6), 813–827.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC: Authors.
Netz, R. (2005). The aesthetics of mathematics: A study. In P. Mancosu, K. F. Jørgensen, & S. A. Pedersen (Eds.), Visualization, explanation and reasoning styles in mathematics (pp. 251–293). Dordrecht: Springer.
Palmer, A. (2004). Fictional minds. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Paterson, J., Thomas, M., & Taylor, S. (2011). Decisions, decisions, decisions: What determines the path taken in lectures? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 985–995.
Pemberton, J., Devaney, R., Hilborn, R., Moses, Y., Neuhauser, C., Taylor, T., et al. (2004). Undergraduate education in the mathematical and physical sciences: Interim report of the Joint Subcommittee of the NSF Education and Human Resources and Mathematical and Physical Sciences Advisory Committees. Washington DC: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/attachments/102806/public/JSACInterimReportEHR-MPSSpring2004.pdf
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric, and social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Riessman, C. K. (2005). Narrative analysis. In Narrative, memory & everyday life (pp. 1–7). Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield.
Ryan, M. (1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory (p. 1991). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Seaman, C. E., & Szydlik, J. E. (2007). Mathematical sophistication among preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 167–182.
Smith, M. (2010). Engaging characters: Further reflection. In J. Eder, F. Jannidis, & R. Schneider (Eds.), Characters in fictional worlds. Understanding imaginary beings in literature, film, and other media (pp. 232–258). New York: De Gruyter.
Solomon, Y., & O’Neill, J. (1998). Mathematics and narrative. Language and Education, 12(3), 210–221.
Speer, N., Smith, J., & Horvath, A. (2010). Collegiate mathematics teaching: An unexamined practice. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29, 99–114.
Thomas, R. S. D. (2002). Mathematics and narrative. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 24(3), 43–46.
Tsay, J. J., Judd, A. B., Hauk, S., & Davis, M. K. (2011). Case study of a college mathematics instructor: Patterns of classroom discourse. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(2), 205–229.
Weber, K. (2004). Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics classrooms: A case study of one professor’s lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 115–133.
Weinberg, A., Fukawa-Connelly, T., & Wiesner, E. (2015). Characterizing instructor gestures in a lecture in a proof-based mathematics class. Educational Studies in Mathematics. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1007/s10649-015-9623-1.
Wood, L., Joyce, S., Petosz, P., & Rodd, M. (2007). Learning in lectures: Multiple representations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(7), 907–915.
Wood, L., & Smith, G. (2004). Language of University Mathematics. Paper presented at the 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Topic Study Group 25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weinberg, A., Wiesner, E. & Fukawa-Connelly, T. Mathematics lectures as narratives: insights from network graph methodology. Educ Stud Math 91, 203–226 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9663-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9663-6