Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematical objects through the lens of two different theoretical perspectives: APOS and OSA

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a networking of two theories, the APOS Theory and the ontosemiotic approach (OSA), to compare and contrast how they conceptualize the notion of a mathematical object. As context of reflection, we designed an APOS genetic decomposition for the derivative and analyzed it from the point of view of OSA. Results of this study show some commonalities and some links between these theories and signal the complementary nature of their constructs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktaç, A., Roa Fuentes, S., Trigueros, M., et al. (2014). APOS Theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Asiala, M., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., & Schwingendorf, K. (1997). The development of students’ graphical understanding of the derivative. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 16(4), 399–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badillo, E. (2003). La derivada como objeto matemático y como objeto de enseñanza y aprendizaje en profesores de matemática de Colombia [The derivative as a mathematical object and purpose of teaching and learning in mathematics teachers in Colombia] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University Autònoma of Barcelona, Spain.

  • Badillo, E., Azcárate, C., & Font, V. (2011). Análisis de los niveles de comprensión de los objetos f’(a) y f’(x) de profesores de matemáticas [Analysis of mathematics teachers’ level of understanding of the objects f’(a) and f’(x)]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 29(2), 191–206.

  • Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Prediger, S. (2010). Networking of theories—an approach for exploiting the diversity of theoretical approaches. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers. Advances in mathematics education series (Vol. 1, pp. 483–506). New York: Springer.

  • Cooley, L., Trigueros, M., & Baker, B. (2007). Schema thematization: A framework and an example. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 370–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drijvers, P., Godino, J. D., Font, V., & Trouche, L. (2013). One episode, two lenses: A reflective analysis of student learning with computer algebra from instrumental and onto-semiotic perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82, 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E. (1997). A reaction to a critique of the selection of mathematical objects as a central metaphor for advanced mathematical thinking by Confrey and Costa. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 2, 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (1994). Varieties of constructivism: Their metaphors, epistemologies and pedagogical implications. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 2, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Font, V., & Contreras, A. (2008). The problem of the particular and its relation to the general in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(1), 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Font, V., Godino, J. D., & Gallardo, J. (2013). The emergence of objects from mathematical practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82, 97–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haspekian, M., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Artigue, M. (2013). When the fiction of learning is kept: A case of networking two theoretical views. In A. Lindmeier, & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 9–16). Kiel, Germany: PME.

  • Radford, L. (2008). Connecting theories in mathematics education: Challenges and possibilities. ZDM. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(2), 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rondero, C., y Font, V. (2015). Articulación de la complejidad matemática de la media aritmética [Articulation of the mathematical complexity of the arithmetic mean]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 33(2), 29--49.

  • Sánchez-Matamoros, G., Fernández, C., & Llinares, S. (2014). Developing pre-service teachers’ noticing of students’ understanding of the derivative concept. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9544-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigueros, M., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2010). Geometrical representations in the learning of two-variable functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been carried out as part of projects EDU2012-32644 and EDU2012-31464, and by Asociación Mexicana de Cultura A. C, and ITAM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicenç Font Moll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Font Moll, V., Trigueros, M., Badillo, E. et al. Mathematical objects through the lens of two different theoretical perspectives: APOS and OSA. Educ Stud Math 91, 107–122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9639-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9639-6

Keywords

Navigation