Abstract
This study examined the impact of the order of two teaching approaches on students’ abilities and on-task behaviors while learning how to solve percentage problems. Two treatment groups were compared. MR first received multiple representation instruction followed by traditional algorithmic instruction and TA first received these teaching approaches in reverse order. Participants included 43 seventh grade students from an urban middle school in Midwestern USA. Results indicated gains in knowledge from both treatment groups; however, the differences between groups were nonsignificant. Comparisons of effect size however, indicated larger growths in abilities to solve among students who received multiple representation instruction first. In addition, statistical differences between on-task behaviors were found in favor of the traditional algorithmic approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, D. (1993). With an eye toward the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93, 373–397.
Bennett, J. M., Burger, E. B., Chard, D. J., Jackson, A. L., Kennedy, P. A., Renfro, F. L., et al. (2007). Holt mathematics: Course 3. Orlando: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in education. Boston: Pearson.
Bottoms, G. (2003). Getting students ready for algebra I: What middle grades students need to know and be able to do. Atlanta: Southern Regional Education Board.
Briars, D., & Siegler, R.S. (1984). A featural analysis of preschoolers' counting knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 20, 607-618.
Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Byrnes, J. (1992). The conceptual basis of procedural learning. Cognitive Development, 7, 235–257.
Byrnes, J. P., & Wasik, B. A. (1991). Role of conceptual knowledge in mathematical procedural learning. Developmental Psychology, 27, 777–786.
Cai, J. (2004). Why do U.S. and Chinese students think differently in mathematical problem solving? Impact of early algebra learning and teachers’ beliefs. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(2), 135–167.
Cai, J., & Lester, F. K. (2005). Solution representations and pedagogical representations in Chinese and U.S. classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3–4), 221–237.
Canobi, K. H., Reeve, R. A., & Pattison, P. E. (1998). The role of conceptual understanding in children’s addition problem solving. Developmental Psychology, 34, 882–891.
Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255–296). New York: Macmillan.
Council of Chief State School Officers & National Governors Association. (2010). Common Core State Standards-Mathematics. Retrieved July 1, 2013, from http://www.corestandards.org/Math
Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (Eds.). (2005). How students learn: Mathematics in the classroom. Washington D. C.: The National Academies Press.
Fosnot, C. T., & Dolk, M. (2002). Young mathematicians at work: Constructing fractions, decimals, and percents. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Goldin, G. A., & Shteingold, N. (2001). Systems of representations and the development of mathematical concepts. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics (pp. 1–23). Reston: NCTM.
Goldstone, R. L., & Son, J. Y. (2005). The transfer of scientific principles using concrete and idealized simulations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 69–110.
Halford, G. S. (1993). Children’s understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65–97). New York: Mcmillan.
Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Howe, R. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics [Review of the book Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics, by L. Ma]. Notices of the AMS , 46, 881–887.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1994). Self-organization and cognitive change. In M. H. Johnson (Ed.), Brain development and cognition (pp. 592–618). Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
Lamon, S. J. (2001). Presenting and representing: From fractions to rational numbers. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics (pp. 146–165). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Ma, L. (2010). Knowing and teaching mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. New York: Routledge.
Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 105–125.
Nathan, M. J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000). Teachers’ and researchers’ beliefs of early algebra development. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 168–190.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.), Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington: National Academy Press.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2009). Focus in high school mathematics: Reasoning and sense making. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Newton, K. J., & Sands, J. (2012). Why don’t we just divide across? Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 17(6), 340–345.
Ng, S.F., & Lee, K. (2009). The model method: Singapore children's tool for representing and solving algebraic word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 282-313.
Putnam, R. T., Heaton, R. M., Prewat, R. S., & Remillard, I. (1992). Teaching mathematics for understanding. Elementary School Journal, 93, 213–228.
Rasmussen, C., Heck, D. J., Tarr, J. E., Knuth, E., White, D. Y., Lambdin, D. V., et al. (2011). Trends and issues in high school mathematics: Research insights and needs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(3), 204–219.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 346–362.
Schneider, M., & Stern, E. (2010). The developmental relations between conceptual and procedural knowledge: A multimethod approach. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 178–192.
Sprick, R., Knight, J., Reinke, W., & McKale, T. (2006). Coaching classroom management: Strategies and tools for administrators and coaches. Eugene: Pacific Northwest Publishing.
Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 213–226.
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). New York: Macmillan.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 9–35.
Van de Walle, J. A., & Lovin, L. H. (2006). The Van de Walle Professional Mathematics Series: Vol. 3. Teaching student-centered mathematics: Grades 5–8. Boston: Pearson.
Wu, H. (2011). The mis-education of mathematics teachers. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 58, 372–383.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Flores, R., Koontz, E., Inan, F.A. et al. Multiple representation instruction first versus traditional algorithmic instruction first: Impact in middle school mathematics classrooms. Educ Stud Math 89, 267–281 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9597-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9597-z