Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 85, Issue 2, pp 201–220 | Cite as

Critical mathematics discourse in a high school classroom: examining patterns of student engagement and resistance

  • Andrew Brantlinger


This article explores the potential of critical mathematics (CM) in terms of its ability to disrupt traditional patterns of student participation in classroom discourse. It draws on tools from critical discourse analysis to examine transcripts from CM activities taught in a remedial high school setting. It points to the promise of CM in terms of its ability to alter established patterns of participation and achievement and to engage previously disengaged students. It indicates how CM instruction might open up a discursive space for traditionally marginalized students to express their ideas and to assert their subjectivity. However, it also raises issues that mathematics educators interested in critical pedagogy should consider, including ongoing issues of passive and active student resistance to CM.


Equity and diversity Critical mathematics Discourse analysis Secondary mathematics Student participation 


  1. Anderson, G., Herr, K., & Nihlen, A. (1994). Studying your own school: An educator’s guide to qualitative practitioner research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, A. (2011). A “curling teacher” in mathematics education: Teacher identities and pedagogy development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23, 427–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arlø, H., & Johnsen-Høines, M. (2010). Critical dialogue in mathematics education. In H. Arlø, O. Ravn, & P. Valero (Eds.), Critical mathematics education: Past, present, and future. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Arlø, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2002). Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intention, reflection, critique (p. 2002). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  5. Ayers, W., Quinn, T., & Stovall, D. (2009). Handbook of social justice in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Boaler, J. (1997). Experiencing school mathematics: Teaching styles, sex, and setting. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brantlinger, A. (2007). Geometries of inequality: Teaching and researching critical mathematics in a low-income urban high school. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation: Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  8. Brantlinger, A. (2010). A view from the other side: Practitioner research on critical mathematics pedagogy in an urban high school. In K. Scott & W. Blanchett (Eds.), Research in urban educational settings: Lessons learned and implications for future practice (pp. 85–102). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Brantlinger, A. (2011a). Critical mathematics in a secondary setting: Promise and problems. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 543–554). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Brantlinger, A. (2011b). Rethinking critical mathematics: A comparative analysis of critical, reform, and traditional geometry instructional texts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(3), 395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brantlinger, A. (2013). Between politics and equations: Teaching critical mathematics in a remedial secondary classroom. American Education Research Journal.
  12. Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  13. Chicago Consortium of Schools. (2004). Surveys of CPS schools.
  14. Dell’Angela, T., & Cohen, J. (2003). Schools’ drive to boost test scores takes its toll. Chicago Tribune. (December 21, 2003).Google Scholar
  15. Dowling, P. (1998). The sociology of mathematics education: Mathematical myths/pedagogic texts. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  16. Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fendel, D., Resek, D., Alper, L., & Fraser, S. (2000). Interactive mathematics program. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.Google Scholar
  18. Frankenstein, M. (1983). Critical mathematics education: An application of Paulo Freire’s epistemology. Boston University Journal of Education, 165(4), 315–339.Google Scholar
  19. Frankenstein, M. (1989). Relearning mathematics: A different third R – radical maths. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  20. Frankenstein, M. (1991). Incorporating race, gender, and class issues into a critical mathematical literacy curriculum. Journal of Negro Education, 59, 336–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frankenstein, M. (2012). Beyond math content and process: Proposals for underlying aspects of social justice education. In A. A. Wager & D. W. Stinson (Eds.), Teaching mathematics for social justice: Conversations with educators. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  22. Freire, P. (1971). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M. B. Ramos, Trans.) New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gee, J. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Gregson, S. (2013). Negotiating social justice teaching: One full-time teacher’s practice viewed from the trenches. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 164–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gutiérrez, R. (2002). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: Towards a new equity research agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2 & 3), 145–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematic for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 37–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Gutstein, E. (2007). “And that’s just how it starts”: Teaching mathematics and developing student agency. Teachers College Record, 109(2), 420–448.Google Scholar
  29. Gutstein, E. (2012). Mathematics as a weapon in the struggle. In O. Skovsmose & B. Greer (Eds.), Opening the cage: Critique and politics of mathematics education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Gutstein, E., & Peterson, B. (Eds.). (2005). Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools, Ltd.Google Scholar
  31. Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York: Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lundin, S. (2012). Hating school, loving mathematics: On the ideological function of critique and reform in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McKernan, J. (1991). Curriculum action research. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  36. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  37. Pais, A., Fernandes, E., Matos, J., & Alves, A. (2012). Recovering the meaning of “critique” in critical mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(1), 29–34.Google Scholar
  38. Pais, A., & Valero, P. (2012). Researching research: Mathematics education in the political. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pardo, N. (1999). All work, less play in public schools. The Chicago Reporter.Google Scholar
  40. Penteado, M. G., & Skovsmose, O. (2009). How to drag with a worn-out mouse? Searching for social justice through collaboration. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Powell, A. B., & Brantlinger, A. (2008). A pluralistic view of critical mathematics. In J. F. Matos, P. Valero, & K. Yasukawa (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 424–433). Lisbon, Portugal: Centro de Investigação, Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
  42. Pruyn, M. (1999). Discourse wars in Gotham-west: A Latino immigrant urban tale of resistance and agency. Colorado: Westview.Google Scholar
  43. Robelen, E. (October1, 2003). Paige: Some students face a form of ‘Apartheid’. Education Week. Accessed at on 4/6/2012.
  44. Skovsmose, O. (1985). Mathematical education versus critical education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(4), 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematical education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Skovsmose, O. (2011). An invitation to critical mathematics education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Turner, E. (2012). Critical mathematical agency in the overcrowding at Francis Middle School Project. In E. Tan, A. Calabrese Barton, with E. Turner & M. Varley Gutiérrez (Eds.), Empowering science and mathematics education in urban communities (Chapter 3, pp. 63–89). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Vithal, R. (2003). In search of a pedagogy of conflict and dialogue for mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams, J., & Joseph, G. (1993). Statistics and inequality: A global perspective. In D. Newlson, G. Joseph, & J. Williams (Eds.), Multicultural mathematics: Teaching mathematics from a global perspective (pp. 175–204). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations