Advertisement

Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 66, Issue 2, pp 107–110 | Cite as

Introduction The topos of meaning or the encounter between past and present

A concrete understanding of reality cannot be attained without a historical approach to it. Ilyenkov, 1982, p. 212.
  • Luis Radford
  • Fulvia Furinghetti
  • Victor Katz
Article

Introduction

Can teachers and educators take advantage of the history of mathematics to enhance the students’ understanding of mathematics? How? These and other related questions still remain without a definite answer. One of the reasons relates to the theoretical presuppositions adopted by contemporary theories of knowing and learning.

For educational theories adopting a pragmatic, empiricist or rationalist stance, knowledge formation is limited to actual experience – to the experience that we make of the world as we engage in it. Within this context, the epistemic import of the historicity of knowledge is something merely irrelevant. However, as the philosopher Immanuel Kant remarked in the eighteenth century, all attempts to derive our concepts from experience and to attribute to them a merely empirical origin are “entirely vain and useless.” (Kant 1929, p. 139). Hans-Georg Gadamer, the father of Hermeneutics, remarked that the naïve empirical posture which leads one to believe...

Keywords

Mathematics Education Mathematical Thinking Foreign Culture Rationalist Stance Empirical Posture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  2. Fried, M. N. (2007). Didactics and history of mathematics: Knowledge and self-knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics (this issue).Google Scholar
  3. Furinghetti, F., & Radford, L. (2002). Historical conceptual developments and the teaching of mathematics: from phylogenesis and ontogenesis theory to classroom practice. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 631–654). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and method, 2nd revised ed. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
  5. Ilyenkov, E. V. (1982). The dialectic of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’s Capital. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
  6. Kant, I. (1929). Critique of pure reason (Translated from the 1781 and 1787 editions by N. Kemp Smith). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Leontiev, A. N. (1968). El hombre y la cultura. In El hombre y la cultura: Problemas téoricos sobre educación (pp. 9–48). Mexico: Grijalbo.Google Scholar
  8. Radford, L. (2006). Communication, apprentissage et formation du je communautaire. In B. D’Amore & S. Sbaragli (Eds.), Incontri con la matematica, 20th National Italian conference on the teaching and learning of mathematics, November 3–5, 2006 (pp. 65–72). Bologna: Pitagora.Google Scholar
  9. Zeuthen, H.-G. (1902). Histoire des Mathématiques dans l’Antiquité et le Moyen Âge. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecole des Sciences deUniversite LaurentienneSudburyCanada
  2. 2.Dipartimento di MatematicaUniversità di GenovaGenovaItaly
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsUniversity of the District of ColumbiaWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations