# Comparative Mathematical Language in the Elementary School: A Longitudinal Study

Article

## Abstract

This paper examines the change in young children’s understanding of ‘equal’, ‘more’, ‘less’, and ‘between’, words commonly used in equivalent and non-equivalent situations, over a 3-year period. Seventy-six children participated in the longitudinal study. Each year they were asked to share their understanding of these four words. Past research has indicated that many children have limited understanding of ‘equal’ as quantitative sameness. The results of this research suggested that many children also have limited understanding of ‘more’ and ‘less’ and that these understandings did not significantly change over the 3-year period.

## Key Words

algebra early arithmetic language of mathematics## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Adler, J.: 1995, ‘Dilemmas and a paradox – secondary mathematics teachers' knowledge of their teaching in multilingual classrooms’,
*Teaching and Teacher Education*11(3), 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Anghileri, J.: 1995, ‘Language, arithmetic, and the negotiation of meaning’,
*For the Learning of Mathematics*15(3), 10–14.Google Scholar - Baroody, A.J. and Ginsburg, H.P.: 1983, ‘The effects of instruction on children's understanding of the equals sign’,
*Elementary School Journal*84(2), 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Baroody, A. and Standifer, D.: 1993, ‘Addition and subtraction in the primary grades’, in R. Jensen (ed.),
*Research Ideas for Classroom: Early Childhood Mathematics*, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar - Baturo, A., Warren, E. and Cooper, T.J.: 2004, Strategic numeracy research and development project: Issues with respect to mathematics student learning outcomes. Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
- Behr, M., Erlwanger, S. and Nichols, E.: 1980, ‘How children view the equals sign’,
*Mathematics Teaching*92, 13–18.Google Scholar - Burns, A.: 1992, ‘Teacher beliefs and their influence on classroom practice’,
*Prospect*7(3), 57–65.Google Scholar - Carpenter, T.P. and Levi, L.: 2000, ‘Developing conceptions of algebraic reasoning in the primary grades’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.Google Scholar
- Carpenter, T., Franke, M. and Levi, L.: 2003,
*Thinking Mathematically; Integrating Arithmetic and Algebra in Elementary School*, Heinemann, Portsmouth.Google Scholar - Christou, C. and Philippou, G.: 1998, ‘The developmental nature of ability to solve one-step word problems’,
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*29(4), 436–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Clarke, D.J.: 1993, ‘Probing the structure of mathematical writing’,
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*25(3), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Conroy, J.S.: 1981, ‘Learning language and mathematical structure in the infants school’,
*Research in Mathematics Education in Australia*2, 203–212.Google Scholar - Davydov, V.V.: 1982, ‘The psychological characteristics of the formation of elementary mathematical operations in children’, in T.P. Carpenter, J.M. Moser, and T.A. Romberg, (eds.),
*Addition and Subtraction: A Cognitive Perspective*, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 224–239.Google Scholar - Davydov, V.V.: 1990, ‘The problem of generalization in traditional psychology and didactics’, in J. Kilpatrick (ed.),
*Types of Generalization in Instruction: Logical and Psychological Problems in the Structuring of School Curricula*. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Va.Google Scholar - DeCorte, E., Verschaffel, L. and Win, L.D.: 1985, ‘Influence of rewording verbal problems on children's problem representations and solutions’,
*Journal of Educational Psychology*77(4), 460–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ernest, P.: 1999, ‘Forms of knowledge in mathematics and mathematics education: Philosophical and rhetorical perspectives’,
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*38(1–3), 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Filloy, E. and Rojano, T.: 1989, ‘Solving equations: The transition from arithmetic to algebra’,
*For the Learning of Mathematics*9(2), 19–25.Google Scholar - Filloy, E. and Sutherland, R.: 1996, ‘Designing curricula for teaching and learning algebra’, in A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick and C. Laborde (eds.),
*International Handbook of Mathematics Education*, Vol. 1, Kluwer Academic Press, Dortrecht, pp. 139–160.Google Scholar - Fischbein, E.: 1999, ‘Intuitions and schemata in mathematical reasoning’,
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*, 38, 11–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Freudenthal, H.: 1983,
*Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures*. Mathematics Education Library, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar - Gal, I.: 1999, ‘Links between literacy and numeracy’, in D. Wagner, R. Venezky and B. Street (eds.),
*Literacy: An International Handbook*, Westview Press, Colarado, pp. 227–231.Google Scholar - Halford, G.: 1993,
*Children's Understanding: The Development of Mental Models*,Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar - Halliday, M.A.K.: 1979,
*Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation ofLanguage and Meaning*, Edward Arnold Publishing, London.Google Scholar - Hudson, T.: 1983, ‘Correspondences and numerical differences between disjoint sets’,
*Child Development*54, 94–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kieran, K. and Chalouh, L.: 1992, ‘Prealgebra: The transition from arithmetic to algebra’, in T.D. Owens (ed.),
*Research Ideas for the Classroom: Middle Grades Mathematics*, Macmillan, New York, pp. 179–198.Google Scholar - Laborde, C.: 1990, ‘Language and mathematics’, in P. Nesher and J. Kilpatrick (eds.),
*Mathematics and Cognition: A Research Synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 53–69.Google Scholar - Lopez-Real, F.: 1997, ‘Effect of different syntactic structure of English and Chinese in simple algebraic problems’, in F. Biddulph and K. Carr (eds.),
*People in Mathematics Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia*, Rotorua, New Zealand, pp. 317–323.Google Scholar - MacGregor, M. and Stacey, K.: 1998, ‘Cognitive models underlying algebraic and non-algebraic solutions to unequal partition problems’,
*Mathematics Education Research Journal*10(2), 46–60.Google Scholar - Nisbet, S. and Warren, E.: 2000, ‘Primary school teachers' beliefs relating to mathematics, teaching and assessing mathematics and factors that influence these beliefs’,
*Mathematics Teacher Education and Development*2, 34–47.Google Scholar - Pirie, S. and Kieren, T.: 1994a, ‘Beyond metaphor. Formalising in mathematical understanding within constructivist environments’,
*For the Learning of Mathematics*14(1), 39–43.Google Scholar - Pirie, S. and Kieren, T.: 1994b, ‘Growth in mathematical understanding. How can we characterize it and how can we represent it?’,
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*26, 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pillay, H., Wills, L. and Boulton-Lewis, G.: 1998, ‘Sequential development of algebra knowledge: A cognitive model’,
*Mathematics Education Research Journal*10(2), 87–102.Google Scholar - Sáenz-Ludlow, A. and Walgamuth, C.: 1998, ‘Third graders' interpretations of equality and the equal symbol’,
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*35(2), 153–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sáenz-Ludlow, A.: 2001, ‘Classroom mathematics discourse as an evolving interpreting game’, Paper presented at 25th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 11–17, 2001. www.math.uncc.edu/$\sim$sae/.
- Silver, E.: 2004, Proceedings of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the National Council for Teaching Mathematics Annual Conference, Research Pre-session, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- Slavit, D.: 1998, ‘The role of operation sense in transitions from arithmetic to algebraic thought’,
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*37(3), 251–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Steinberg, R.M., Sleeman, D.H. and Ktoriza, D.: 1991, ‘Algebra students' knowledge of equivalence of equations’,
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*22(2), 112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tsamir, P. and Almog, N.: 2001, ‘Student's strategies and difficulties, the case of algebraic inequalities’,
*International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology*32(4), 513–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tsamir, P. and Bazzini, L.: 2001, ‘Investigation of the influence of the intuitive rules in Israel and in Taiwan’, in M. Heuvel-Panhuizen (ed.),
*Proceedings of the 25th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*, Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University, pp 303–311.Google Scholar - Verschaffel, L. and De Corte, E.: 1996, ‘Number and arithmetic’, in A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick and C. Laborde (eds.),
*International Handbook of Mathematics Education*, Vol. 1, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 99–137.Google Scholar - Walkderine, V.: 1988,
*Democracy in the Kitchen*, Virago Press, London.Google Scholar - Walkerdine, V.: 1990, ‘Different cognition and mathematics education’,
*For the Learning of Mathematics*10(3), 51–56.Google Scholar - Warren, E.: 2001, ‘Algebraic understanding and the importance of operation sense’, in M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (ed.),
*Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 11–17, 2001, Vol. IV, pp. 399–406.Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006