Abstract
In this article, we attempt to provide an overview of the features of the abilities, aptitudes, and frames of minds that are attributed to critical thinking and provide the broad outlines of the development of critical-analytic thinking (CAT) abilities. In addition, we evaluate the potential viability of three main hypotheses regarding the reasons for developmental trends in CAT and address problems of achieving the ideal of a critical-analytic thinker at all age levels. The first hypothesis is that standard instruction in disciplines such as the sciences and social sciences, couch findings, and theories as matters of choice rather than as inferences is being more warranted than others. The second hypothesis is that there are developmental constraints on the expression of CAT that would limit the efficacy of instruction seeking to promote increased appreciation for inferential warrants and the idea of progress in disciplines. These constraints could be tied to the acquisition of knowledge, development of expertise, and brain development. The third hypothesis pertains to motivational reasons for not exerting the time and effort required to engage in CAT. We conclude by proposing a research agenda to investigate these hypotheses, as the first step in understanding the kinds of interventions that might be needed to increase the level of CAT expressed in high school and college graduates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, P. A. (2014). Thinking critically-analytically about critical-analytic thinking: an introduction. Educational Psychology Review.
American Nursing Association. (2010). Nursing: scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). MD: Silver Spring.
Baltes, B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: a metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 122–136.
Baron, J. (2007). Thinking and deciding (4th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bassok, M., & Novick, L. R. (2012). Problem solving. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 413–432). New York: Oxford University Press.
Baum, L. A., Danovich, J. H., & Keil, F. C. (2008). Children’s sensitivity to circular explanations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100, 146–155.
Berliner, D. C. (1993). The 100-year journey of educational psychology: from interest, to disdain, to respect for practice. In T. K. Fagan & G. R. VandenBos (Eds.), Exploring applied psychology: origins and critical analyses (pp. 37–78). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bloom, P. (2000). How children learn the meaning of words. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Brookfield, S. D. (2012). Teaching for critical thinking: tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Byrnes (2008). Cognitive development in instructional contexts (3rd ed.). Needham Hts: Allyn & Bacon.
Capstick, S. B. & Pidgeon, N. F. (2014). What is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Global Environmental Change, 24, 389–401.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
Dewey, J. D. (1933). How we think, a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D. C. Heath.
Diamond, A. (2012). Activities and programs that improve children’s executive functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 335–341.
Dumas, D., Alexander, P., Baker, L.M., Jablansky, S., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). Clinical relations: how relational reasoning supports medical education and practice. Educational Psychology. First published online May 8.
Dunbar, K. (2002). Science as category: implications of InVivo science for theories of cognitive development, scientific discovery, and the nature of science. In S. Stich & P. Carruthers (Eds.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 154–170). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dunbar, K., Fugelsang, J., & Stein, C. (2007). Do naive theories ever go away? Using brain and behavior to understand changes in concepts. In M. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data (pp. 193–206). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dunbar, K. N., & Klahr, D. (2012). Scientific thinking and reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 701–718). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ennis, R. H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: theory and practice (pp. 9–26). New York: W. H. Freeman.
Ericsson, K. A. (2013). Exceptional memory and expert performance: from Simon and Chase’s theory of expertise to skilled memory and beyond. In J. J. Staszewski (Ed.), Expertise and skill acquisition: the impact of William G. Chase (pp. 201–228). New York: Psychology Press.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2012). Dual process theories of deductive reasoning: facts and fallacies. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 115–133). New York: Oxford University Press.
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(223–241), 263–271.
Fugelsang, J.A., & Dunbar, K. N. (2005). Brain-based mechanisms underlying complex causal thinking. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1204–1213.
Glaser, E. (1941). An experiment in the development of critical thinking. New York: J. J. Little and Ives Company.
Green, A. E., & Dunbar, K. N. (2012). Mental function as genetic expression: emerging insights from cognitive neurogenetics. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 90–114). New York: Oxford University Press.
Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: an introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
Harris, P. J. (2002). What do children learn from testimony? In P. Carruthers, S. P. Stich, & M. Siegal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 316–334). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4, 71–115.
Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407–424.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Farran, E. K. (2012). Theoretical and empirical directions within a neuroconstructivist framework. In E. K. Farran & A. Karmiloff-Smith (Eds.), Neurodevelopmental disorders across the lifespan: a neuroconstructivist approach (pp. 363–372). New York: Oxford University Press.
Mulvey, K. L., Hitti, A., & Killen, M. (2013). Morality, intentionality, and exclusion: how children navigate the social world. In M. Banaji & S. Gelman (Eds.), Navigating the social world: a developmental perspective (pp. 377–384). New York: Oxford University Press.
Klaczinski, P. A., & Lavallee, K. L. (2005). Domain-specific identity, epistemic regulation, and intellectual ability as predictors of belief-based reasoning: a dual-process perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 1–24.
Klaczynski, P. A., & Robinson, B. (2000). Personal theories, intellectual ability and epistemological beliefs: adult age differences in everyday reasoning biases. Psychology and Aging, 15, 400–416.
Kuhl, P. K. (2006). A new view of language acquisition. In H. Luria, D, M, Seymour & T. Smoke (Eds.), Language and linguistics in context: readings and applications for teachers (pp. 29–42). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28, 16–26.
Kuhn, D. (2011). What people may do versus can do. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 343, 83.
Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ reasoning. Psychological Science, 22, 545–552.
Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., & Lucas, D. (2008). Supporting development of the epistemology of inquiry. Cognitive Development, 23, 512–529.
Lombrozo, T. (2012). Explanation and abductive inference. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 260–276). New York: Oxford University Press.
Maggioni, L., VanSledright, B., & Alexander, P. A. (2009). Walking on the borders: a measure of epistemic cognition in history. Journal of Experimental Education, 77, 187–213.
Mercier, H. (2011). Reasoning serves argumentation in children. Cognitive Development, 26, 177–191.
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 57–111.
Mills, C. M. (2012). Knowing when to doubt: developing a critical stance when learning from others. Developmental Psychology, 49, 404–418.
Moore, T. J. (2011). Critical thinking and language: the challenge of generic skills and disciplinary discourse. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Nandagopal, K., & Ericsson, K. A. (2012). Enhancing students’ performance in traditional education: implications from the expert–performance approach and deliberate practice. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook. Volume 1: theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 257–293). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 192–233.
Schraw, G., & Gutierrez, A. (2012). Assessment of thinking skills. In M. F. Shaughnessy (Ed.), Critical thinking and higher order thinking: a current perspective (pp. 191–203). Hauppague: Nova Science Publishers.
Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (2012). On the distinction between rationality and intelligence: implications for understanding individual differences in reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 433–455). New York: Oxford University Press.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672–695.
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 259–264.
Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., Birney, D. P., Naples, A., Stemler, S. E., Newman, T., Otterbach, R., Parish, C., Randi, J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). Testing the theory of successful intelligence in teaching grade 4 language arts, mathematics, and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 881–899.
Swanson, H. L., & Alloway, T. P. (2012). Working memory, learning, and academic achievement. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook. Volume 1: theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 327–366). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011). How to grow a mind: statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science, 331(6022), 1279–1285.
Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Rational thinking and cognitive sophistication: development, cognitive abilities, and thinking dispositions. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1037–1048.
Thompson, V., & Evans, J. S. B. T. (2012). Belief bias in informal reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 18, 278–310.
Willingham, W. T. (2008). Critical thinking: why is it so hard to teach? Arts Education Policy Review, 109, 21–29.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. (Anscombe, G.E.M., trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wong, S. L., & Hodson, D. (2009). From the horse’s mouth: what scientists say about scientific investigation and scientific knowledge. Science Education, 93, 109–130.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Byrnes, J.P., Dunbar, K.N. The Nature and Development of Critical-Analytic Thinking. Educ Psychol Rev 26, 477–493 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9284-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9284-0